Data-driven or background knowledge ontology development

Emma Tonkin, Heather D Pfeiffer

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

The development of ontologies for various purposes is now a relatively commonplace process. A number of different approaches towards this aim are evident; empirical methodologies, giving rise to data-driven procedures or self-reflective (innate) methodologies, resulting in artifacts that are based on intellectual background understanding. In this paper, we compare and contrast these approaches through two practical examples, one from a descriptive metadata domain and one from the area of physical computing. Both examples are chosen from domains in which automated extraction of information is a significant use case for the resulting ontology. We identify a relationship within the ontology development process that allies empirical evidence and user judgement to develop user-centred ontologies, either on an individual or collaboratively-focused basis. A qualitative treatment of the characteristics of this type of 'language game' is identified as an ongoing research goal.

Conference

ConferenceInternational Conference on Knowledge Management (ICKM)
CountryUSA United States
CityPittsburgh
Period22/10/1023/10/10

Fingerprint

Ontology
Metadata

Cite this

Tonkin, E., & Pfeiffer, H. D. (2010). Data-driven or background knowledge ontology development. Paper presented at International Conference on Knowledge Management (ICKM), Pittsburgh, USA United States.

Data-driven or background knowledge ontology development. / Tonkin, Emma; Pfeiffer, Heather D.

2010. Paper presented at International Conference on Knowledge Management (ICKM), Pittsburgh, USA United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Tonkin, E & Pfeiffer, HD 2010, 'Data-driven or background knowledge ontology development' Paper presented at International Conference on Knowledge Management (ICKM), Pittsburgh, USA United States, 22/10/10 - 23/10/10, .
Tonkin E, Pfeiffer HD. Data-driven or background knowledge ontology development. 2010. Paper presented at International Conference on Knowledge Management (ICKM), Pittsburgh, USA United States.
Tonkin, Emma ; Pfeiffer, Heather D. / Data-driven or background knowledge ontology development. Paper presented at International Conference on Knowledge Management (ICKM), Pittsburgh, USA United States.
@conference{de2bd6237d5045d9abac40d9d929bf45,
title = "Data-driven or background knowledge ontology development",
abstract = "The development of ontologies for various purposes is now a relatively commonplace process. A number of different approaches towards this aim are evident; empirical methodologies, giving rise to data-driven procedures or self-reflective (innate) methodologies, resulting in artifacts that are based on intellectual background understanding. In this paper, we compare and contrast these approaches through two practical examples, one from a descriptive metadata domain and one from the area of physical computing. Both examples are chosen from domains in which automated extraction of information is a significant use case for the resulting ontology. We identify a relationship within the ontology development process that allies empirical evidence and user judgement to develop user-centred ontologies, either on an individual or collaboratively-focused basis. A qualitative treatment of the characteristics of this type of 'language game' is identified as an ongoing research goal.",
author = "Emma Tonkin and Pfeiffer, {Heather D}",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
day = "23",
language = "English",
note = "International Conference on Knowledge Management (ICKM) ; Conference date: 22-10-2010 Through 23-10-2010",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Data-driven or background knowledge ontology development

AU - Tonkin,Emma

AU - Pfeiffer,Heather D

PY - 2010/10/23

Y1 - 2010/10/23

N2 - The development of ontologies for various purposes is now a relatively commonplace process. A number of different approaches towards this aim are evident; empirical methodologies, giving rise to data-driven procedures or self-reflective (innate) methodologies, resulting in artifacts that are based on intellectual background understanding. In this paper, we compare and contrast these approaches through two practical examples, one from a descriptive metadata domain and one from the area of physical computing. Both examples are chosen from domains in which automated extraction of information is a significant use case for the resulting ontology. We identify a relationship within the ontology development process that allies empirical evidence and user judgement to develop user-centred ontologies, either on an individual or collaboratively-focused basis. A qualitative treatment of the characteristics of this type of 'language game' is identified as an ongoing research goal.

AB - The development of ontologies for various purposes is now a relatively commonplace process. A number of different approaches towards this aim are evident; empirical methodologies, giving rise to data-driven procedures or self-reflective (innate) methodologies, resulting in artifacts that are based on intellectual background understanding. In this paper, we compare and contrast these approaches through two practical examples, one from a descriptive metadata domain and one from the area of physical computing. Both examples are chosen from domains in which automated extraction of information is a significant use case for the resulting ontology. We identify a relationship within the ontology development process that allies empirical evidence and user judgement to develop user-centred ontologies, either on an individual or collaboratively-focused basis. A qualitative treatment of the characteristics of this type of 'language game' is identified as an ongoing research goal.

M3 - Paper

ER -