Damned if you do and damned if you don't

the (re)production of larger breasts as ideal in criticisms of breast surgery

Avelie Stuart, Tim Kurz, Kerry Ashby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In contemporary Western societies women are often thought to have overcome inequality, become autonomous and resistant to social pressures, and in so doing gained the freedoms to make their own choices. However, this 'post-feminist sensibility' can arguably be seen as a double-bind as some types of 'choices' cannot always be recognised as freely chosen if they are taken as an indication of failing to resist social (appearance) pressures. We argue that one such example is the 'choice' to have cosmetic breast surgery, a practice that has received both criticism and celebration from different feminist angles. In this paper we analyse how women who have had breast augmentation are constructed by readers of an internet blog in which they are largely vilified and pathologised for not valuing their 'natural' (yet 'deficient') breasts. We demonstrate how the same discursive constructions that appear to value women's 'natural' bodies simultaneously (re)produce the conditions in which women may feel the need to have breast augmentation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)405-420
Number of pages16
JournalAustralian Feminist Studies
Volume27
Issue number74
Early online date15 Nov 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2012

Fingerprint

surgery
criticism
cosmetics
weblog
indication
Internet
society
Values

Cite this

Damned if you do and damned if you don't : the (re)production of larger breasts as ideal in criticisms of breast surgery. / Stuart, Avelie; Kurz, Tim; Ashby, Kerry.

In: Australian Feminist Studies, Vol. 27, No. 74, 01.12.2012, p. 405-420.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0e39f8fd610a423098fcad2e7a8a88bd,
title = "Damned if you do and damned if you don't: the (re)production of larger breasts as ideal in criticisms of breast surgery",
abstract = "In contemporary Western societies women are often thought to have overcome inequality, become autonomous and resistant to social pressures, and in so doing gained the freedoms to make their own choices. However, this 'post-feminist sensibility' can arguably be seen as a double-bind as some types of 'choices' cannot always be recognised as freely chosen if they are taken as an indication of failing to resist social (appearance) pressures. We argue that one such example is the 'choice' to have cosmetic breast surgery, a practice that has received both criticism and celebration from different feminist angles. In this paper we analyse how women who have had breast augmentation are constructed by readers of an internet blog in which they are largely vilified and pathologised for not valuing their 'natural' (yet 'deficient') breasts. We demonstrate how the same discursive constructions that appear to value women's 'natural' bodies simultaneously (re)produce the conditions in which women may feel the need to have breast augmentation.",
author = "Avelie Stuart and Tim Kurz and Kerry Ashby",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/08164649.2012.727271",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "405--420",
journal = "Australian Feminist Studies",
issn = "0816-4649",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "74",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Damned if you do and damned if you don't

T2 - the (re)production of larger breasts as ideal in criticisms of breast surgery

AU - Stuart, Avelie

AU - Kurz, Tim

AU - Ashby, Kerry

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - In contemporary Western societies women are often thought to have overcome inequality, become autonomous and resistant to social pressures, and in so doing gained the freedoms to make their own choices. However, this 'post-feminist sensibility' can arguably be seen as a double-bind as some types of 'choices' cannot always be recognised as freely chosen if they are taken as an indication of failing to resist social (appearance) pressures. We argue that one such example is the 'choice' to have cosmetic breast surgery, a practice that has received both criticism and celebration from different feminist angles. In this paper we analyse how women who have had breast augmentation are constructed by readers of an internet blog in which they are largely vilified and pathologised for not valuing their 'natural' (yet 'deficient') breasts. We demonstrate how the same discursive constructions that appear to value women's 'natural' bodies simultaneously (re)produce the conditions in which women may feel the need to have breast augmentation.

AB - In contemporary Western societies women are often thought to have overcome inequality, become autonomous and resistant to social pressures, and in so doing gained the freedoms to make their own choices. However, this 'post-feminist sensibility' can arguably be seen as a double-bind as some types of 'choices' cannot always be recognised as freely chosen if they are taken as an indication of failing to resist social (appearance) pressures. We argue that one such example is the 'choice' to have cosmetic breast surgery, a practice that has received both criticism and celebration from different feminist angles. In this paper we analyse how women who have had breast augmentation are constructed by readers of an internet blog in which they are largely vilified and pathologised for not valuing their 'natural' (yet 'deficient') breasts. We demonstrate how the same discursive constructions that appear to value women's 'natural' bodies simultaneously (re)produce the conditions in which women may feel the need to have breast augmentation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869851707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2012.727271

U2 - 10.1080/08164649.2012.727271

DO - 10.1080/08164649.2012.727271

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 405

EP - 420

JO - Australian Feminist Studies

JF - Australian Feminist Studies

SN - 0816-4649

IS - 74

ER -