“Cry, ‘Havoc!’ and Let Slip the Managers of War”: The Strategic, Military and Moral Hazards of Micro-Managed Warfare

Paul Cornish

Research output: Book/ReportOther report

Abstract

If intrusive political, media and public oversight into the fine detail of the conduct of military affairs were to become the norm, what could be the implications? This paper argues that the micro-management of warfare, and less intensive military operations such as humanitarian intervention and peacekeeping, can distort and unbalance the broad political-military relationship. The consequences of that unbalancing could be described in terms of three related hazards: strategic (where the Clausewitzian model, predominant in the West, of the linkage between society and armed forces, and between politics and war, becomes strained); military (where modern western military practices such as manoeuvre warfare, mission command and rules of engagement become difficult if not impossible to sustain); and moral (where the western liberal project to contain and moderate the effects of warfare is undermined).
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationBrussels
PublisherNATO
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2002

Fingerprint

warfare
Military
manager
humanitarian intervention
peacekeeping
military
politics
management

Cite this

“Cry, ‘Havoc!’ and Let Slip the Managers of War”: The Strategic, Military and Moral Hazards of Micro-Managed Warfare. / Cornish, Paul.

Brussels : NATO, 2002.

Research output: Book/ReportOther report

@book{f315bbb59fe94ac8a11403ebe00debbb,
title = "“Cry, ‘Havoc!’ and Let Slip the Managers of War”: The Strategic, Military and Moral Hazards of Micro-Managed Warfare",
abstract = "If intrusive political, media and public oversight into the fine detail of the conduct of military affairs were to become the norm, what could be the implications? This paper argues that the micro-management of warfare, and less intensive military operations such as humanitarian intervention and peacekeeping, can distort and unbalance the broad political-military relationship. The consequences of that unbalancing could be described in terms of three related hazards: strategic (where the Clausewitzian model, predominant in the West, of the linkage between society and armed forces, and between politics and war, becomes strained); military (where modern western military practices such as manoeuvre warfare, mission command and rules of engagement become difficult if not impossible to sustain); and moral (where the western liberal project to contain and moderate the effects of warfare is undermined).",
author = "Paul Cornish",
year = "2002",
month = "10",
language = "English",
publisher = "NATO",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - “Cry, ‘Havoc!’ and Let Slip the Managers of War”: The Strategic, Military and Moral Hazards of Micro-Managed Warfare

AU - Cornish, Paul

PY - 2002/10

Y1 - 2002/10

N2 - If intrusive political, media and public oversight into the fine detail of the conduct of military affairs were to become the norm, what could be the implications? This paper argues that the micro-management of warfare, and less intensive military operations such as humanitarian intervention and peacekeeping, can distort and unbalance the broad political-military relationship. The consequences of that unbalancing could be described in terms of three related hazards: strategic (where the Clausewitzian model, predominant in the West, of the linkage between society and armed forces, and between politics and war, becomes strained); military (where modern western military practices such as manoeuvre warfare, mission command and rules of engagement become difficult if not impossible to sustain); and moral (where the western liberal project to contain and moderate the effects of warfare is undermined).

AB - If intrusive political, media and public oversight into the fine detail of the conduct of military affairs were to become the norm, what could be the implications? This paper argues that the micro-management of warfare, and less intensive military operations such as humanitarian intervention and peacekeeping, can distort and unbalance the broad political-military relationship. The consequences of that unbalancing could be described in terms of three related hazards: strategic (where the Clausewitzian model, predominant in the West, of the linkage between society and armed forces, and between politics and war, becomes strained); military (where modern western military practices such as manoeuvre warfare, mission command and rules of engagement become difficult if not impossible to sustain); and moral (where the western liberal project to contain and moderate the effects of warfare is undermined).

UR - http://www.nato.int/acad/fellow/99-01/cornish.pdf

M3 - Other report

BT - “Cry, ‘Havoc!’ and Let Slip the Managers of War”: The Strategic, Military and Moral Hazards of Micro-Managed Warfare

PB - NATO

CY - Brussels

ER -