Crossing the innovation threshold through mergers and acquisitions

Elena Cefis, Orietta Marsili

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Firms are resorting more and more to mergers and acquisitions (M&A) to bridge the gap between where they are and where they would like to be in relation to innovation and performance. This paper investigates whether involvement in M&A triggers distinct patterns of innovative behaviour across firms, and whether this effect is conditional on firm size. The analysis combines data from four waves of the Community Innovation Survey (CIS) and the Business Register of Dutch manufacturing firms. We observe that M&As influence the probability that firms will begin innovation activities or persist with them, and these effects vary at different points in the firm size distribution. In particular, by using M&A firms are able to persist with the innovation efforts and output over time, and this effect is especially strong for large firms. For small firms, M&A help them to cross the 'innovation threshold', increasing the probability of the transition from a non-innovator to an active innovator. However, the M&A effect does not mitigate the tendency of small firms to be occasional innovators.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)698-710
Number of pages13
JournalResearch Policy
Volume44
Issue number3
Early online date22 Dec 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2015

Fingerprint

Mergers and acquisitions
Innovation
Industry

Keywords

  • Dynamic random effect probit models
  • Innovation
  • Mergers and acquisitions
  • Multiplicative interaction models
  • Small and medium sized enterprises

Cite this

Crossing the innovation threshold through mergers and acquisitions. / Cefis, Elena; Marsili, Orietta.

In: Research Policy, Vol. 44, No. 3, 04.2015, p. 698-710.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ad0990a340994e498de86cf63b318580,
title = "Crossing the innovation threshold through mergers and acquisitions",
abstract = "Firms are resorting more and more to mergers and acquisitions (M&A) to bridge the gap between where they are and where they would like to be in relation to innovation and performance. This paper investigates whether involvement in M&A triggers distinct patterns of innovative behaviour across firms, and whether this effect is conditional on firm size. The analysis combines data from four waves of the Community Innovation Survey (CIS) and the Business Register of Dutch manufacturing firms. We observe that M&As influence the probability that firms will begin innovation activities or persist with them, and these effects vary at different points in the firm size distribution. In particular, by using M&A firms are able to persist with the innovation efforts and output over time, and this effect is especially strong for large firms. For small firms, M&A help them to cross the 'innovation threshold', increasing the probability of the transition from a non-innovator to an active innovator. However, the M&A effect does not mitigate the tendency of small firms to be occasional innovators.",
keywords = "Dynamic random effect probit models, Innovation, Mergers and acquisitions, Multiplicative interaction models, Small and medium sized enterprises",
author = "Elena Cefis and Orietta Marsili",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.010",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "698--710",
journal = "Research Policy",
issn = "0048-7333",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Crossing the innovation threshold through mergers and acquisitions

AU - Cefis, Elena

AU - Marsili, Orietta

PY - 2015/4

Y1 - 2015/4

N2 - Firms are resorting more and more to mergers and acquisitions (M&A) to bridge the gap between where they are and where they would like to be in relation to innovation and performance. This paper investigates whether involvement in M&A triggers distinct patterns of innovative behaviour across firms, and whether this effect is conditional on firm size. The analysis combines data from four waves of the Community Innovation Survey (CIS) and the Business Register of Dutch manufacturing firms. We observe that M&As influence the probability that firms will begin innovation activities or persist with them, and these effects vary at different points in the firm size distribution. In particular, by using M&A firms are able to persist with the innovation efforts and output over time, and this effect is especially strong for large firms. For small firms, M&A help them to cross the 'innovation threshold', increasing the probability of the transition from a non-innovator to an active innovator. However, the M&A effect does not mitigate the tendency of small firms to be occasional innovators.

AB - Firms are resorting more and more to mergers and acquisitions (M&A) to bridge the gap between where they are and where they would like to be in relation to innovation and performance. This paper investigates whether involvement in M&A triggers distinct patterns of innovative behaviour across firms, and whether this effect is conditional on firm size. The analysis combines data from four waves of the Community Innovation Survey (CIS) and the Business Register of Dutch manufacturing firms. We observe that M&As influence the probability that firms will begin innovation activities or persist with them, and these effects vary at different points in the firm size distribution. In particular, by using M&A firms are able to persist with the innovation efforts and output over time, and this effect is especially strong for large firms. For small firms, M&A help them to cross the 'innovation threshold', increasing the probability of the transition from a non-innovator to an active innovator. However, the M&A effect does not mitigate the tendency of small firms to be occasional innovators.

KW - Dynamic random effect probit models

KW - Innovation

KW - Mergers and acquisitions

KW - Multiplicative interaction models

KW - Small and medium sized enterprises

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923222988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.010

U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.010

DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.010

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 698

EP - 710

JO - Research Policy

JF - Research Policy

SN - 0048-7333

IS - 3

ER -