Cross-national comparative communication and deliberation about the risks of nanotechnologies

Nick Pidgeon, Barbara Herr Harthorn, Terre Satterfield, Christina Demski

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

11 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

This chapter presents some of the methodological and philosophical challenges faced when conducting public engagement with emerging technologies. The intellectual origins and challenges of conducting upstream public engagement for science communication are discussed, illustrated through the case of nanotechnologies. A series of cross- national workshops held simultaneously in the United States and the UK are described. Findings included that benefits continued to be weighted more heavily than risks in participants’ perceptions of nanotechnologies, as well as did the type of application; that there were more US- UK cross- cultural similarities than differences in the data; the differences that did emerge were both subtle and contextual; and that discourses about social concerns rather than physical risk issues were more salient for participants in both countries. Four methodological challenges for upstream engagement are outlined. We argue that we must also place diverse publics and other concerned stakeholders at the heart of processes of responsible innovation.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP)
Pages147-155
Number of pages9
ISBN (Electronic)9780190497620
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

Keywords

  • Nanotechnologies
  • Public engagement
  • Responsible innovation
  • Risk
  • Risk issues
  • Upstream engagement
  • US-UK cross- cultural similarities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-national comparative communication and deliberation about the risks of nanotechnologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this