Cross cultural application of the WHOQOL-SRPB in the chinese community with diverse spiritual affiliations

Kitty Chan, Bas Verplanken, Suzanne Skevington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim was to determine the cross-cultural applicability, reliability, construct and convergent validity of the WHOQOL-SRPB in the Chinese community, and to compare the quality of life of contrasting spiritual groups. The WHOQOL-SRPB and Importance measures were administered to community participants (n = 445) in Hong Kong. The spiritual well-being scale (SWBS) was administered to examine the convergent validity of the SRPB domain. Quotas for three age bands (18–44, 45–64, ≥65) were targeted, within two broad religious groupings: Chinese spiritual (CSG) and Christian (CG). Test–retest reliability over two weeks was assessed in a second sample (n = 68). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and other psychometric tests were performed. Alphas for the original WHOQOL domains were acceptable, ranging from 0.72 to 0.84, and excellent for the SRPB domain (α = .92). Test–retest reliability (ICC) of the SRPB domain (α = .95) and its facets (range .80– .94) was excellent. A confirmatory factor analysis on the SRPB-expanded model suggested a reasonable fit (Chi square/df = 4.78), in spite of a relatively low Comparative Fit Index (0.80). The SRPB domain showed a similar structure to SWBS religious and existential subscales. The nine SRPB facets and their Importance scores discriminate well between CSG and CG. The WHOQOL-SRPB is reliable, valid and applicable for Chinese people with Christian and traditional Chinese Spiritual beliefs to use. SRPB is a distinctive dimension that is conceptually consistent with religious and existential beliefs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)291-312
Number of pages22
JournalSocial Indicators Research
Volume132
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2017

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Statistical Factor Analysis
Religion
Hong Kong
Psychometrics
community
factor analysis
well-being
Quality of Life
grouping
psychometrics
quality of life
Group
Spiritual Well-being
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Test-retest Reliability

Keywords

  • Culture
  • Quality of life
  • Spiritual
  • Valid
  • WHOQOL-SRPB

Cite this

Cross cultural application of the WHOQOL-SRPB in the chinese community with diverse spiritual affiliations. / Chan, Kitty; Verplanken, Bas; Skevington, Suzanne.

In: Social Indicators Research, Vol. 132, No. 1, 01.05.2017, p. 291-312.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{adc10fc71f0a4e6fb9647e597dee2acc,
title = "Cross cultural application of the WHOQOL-SRPB in the chinese community with diverse spiritual affiliations",
abstract = "The aim was to determine the cross-cultural applicability, reliability, construct and convergent validity of the WHOQOL-SRPB in the Chinese community, and to compare the quality of life of contrasting spiritual groups. The WHOQOL-SRPB and Importance measures were administered to community participants (n = 445) in Hong Kong. The spiritual well-being scale (SWBS) was administered to examine the convergent validity of the SRPB domain. Quotas for three age bands (18–44, 45–64, ≥65) were targeted, within two broad religious groupings: Chinese spiritual (CSG) and Christian (CG). Test–retest reliability over two weeks was assessed in a second sample (n = 68). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and other psychometric tests were performed. Alphas for the original WHOQOL domains were acceptable, ranging from 0.72 to 0.84, and excellent for the SRPB domain (α = .92). Test–retest reliability (ICC) of the SRPB domain (α = .95) and its facets (range .80– .94) was excellent. A confirmatory factor analysis on the SRPB-expanded model suggested a reasonable fit (Chi square/df = 4.78), in spite of a relatively low Comparative Fit Index (0.80). The SRPB domain showed a similar structure to SWBS religious and existential subscales. The nine SRPB facets and their Importance scores discriminate well between CSG and CG. The WHOQOL-SRPB is reliable, valid and applicable for Chinese people with Christian and traditional Chinese Spiritual beliefs to use. SRPB is a distinctive dimension that is conceptually consistent with religious and existential beliefs.",
keywords = "Culture, Quality of life, Spiritual, Valid, WHOQOL-SRPB",
author = "Kitty Chan and Bas Verplanken and Suzanne Skevington",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11205-016-1308-3",
language = "English",
volume = "132",
pages = "291--312",
journal = "Social Indicators Research",
issn = "0303-8300",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross cultural application of the WHOQOL-SRPB in the chinese community with diverse spiritual affiliations

AU - Chan, Kitty

AU - Verplanken, Bas

AU - Skevington, Suzanne

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - The aim was to determine the cross-cultural applicability, reliability, construct and convergent validity of the WHOQOL-SRPB in the Chinese community, and to compare the quality of life of contrasting spiritual groups. The WHOQOL-SRPB and Importance measures were administered to community participants (n = 445) in Hong Kong. The spiritual well-being scale (SWBS) was administered to examine the convergent validity of the SRPB domain. Quotas for three age bands (18–44, 45–64, ≥65) were targeted, within two broad religious groupings: Chinese spiritual (CSG) and Christian (CG). Test–retest reliability over two weeks was assessed in a second sample (n = 68). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and other psychometric tests were performed. Alphas for the original WHOQOL domains were acceptable, ranging from 0.72 to 0.84, and excellent for the SRPB domain (α = .92). Test–retest reliability (ICC) of the SRPB domain (α = .95) and its facets (range .80– .94) was excellent. A confirmatory factor analysis on the SRPB-expanded model suggested a reasonable fit (Chi square/df = 4.78), in spite of a relatively low Comparative Fit Index (0.80). The SRPB domain showed a similar structure to SWBS religious and existential subscales. The nine SRPB facets and their Importance scores discriminate well between CSG and CG. The WHOQOL-SRPB is reliable, valid and applicable for Chinese people with Christian and traditional Chinese Spiritual beliefs to use. SRPB is a distinctive dimension that is conceptually consistent with religious and existential beliefs.

AB - The aim was to determine the cross-cultural applicability, reliability, construct and convergent validity of the WHOQOL-SRPB in the Chinese community, and to compare the quality of life of contrasting spiritual groups. The WHOQOL-SRPB and Importance measures were administered to community participants (n = 445) in Hong Kong. The spiritual well-being scale (SWBS) was administered to examine the convergent validity of the SRPB domain. Quotas for three age bands (18–44, 45–64, ≥65) were targeted, within two broad religious groupings: Chinese spiritual (CSG) and Christian (CG). Test–retest reliability over two weeks was assessed in a second sample (n = 68). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and other psychometric tests were performed. Alphas for the original WHOQOL domains were acceptable, ranging from 0.72 to 0.84, and excellent for the SRPB domain (α = .92). Test–retest reliability (ICC) of the SRPB domain (α = .95) and its facets (range .80– .94) was excellent. A confirmatory factor analysis on the SRPB-expanded model suggested a reasonable fit (Chi square/df = 4.78), in spite of a relatively low Comparative Fit Index (0.80). The SRPB domain showed a similar structure to SWBS religious and existential subscales. The nine SRPB facets and their Importance scores discriminate well between CSG and CG. The WHOQOL-SRPB is reliable, valid and applicable for Chinese people with Christian and traditional Chinese Spiritual beliefs to use. SRPB is a distinctive dimension that is conceptually consistent with religious and existential beliefs.

KW - Culture

KW - Quality of life

KW - Spiritual

KW - Valid

KW - WHOQOL-SRPB

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961673915&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1308-3

U2 - 10.1007/s11205-016-1308-3

DO - 10.1007/s11205-016-1308-3

M3 - Article

VL - 132

SP - 291

EP - 312

JO - Social Indicators Research

JF - Social Indicators Research

SN - 0303-8300

IS - 1

ER -