Cross-assignment discrimination in pay

A test case of major league baseball

Örn B. Bodvarsson, Kerry L. Papps, John G. Sessions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

85 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The traditional Becker/Arrow style model of discrimination depicts majority and minority workers as perfectly substitutable inputs, implying that all workers have the same job assignment. The model is only appropriate for determining whether pay differences between, for example, whites and non-whites doing job assignment A are attributable to prejudice (‘within-assignment discrimination’); It is inappropriate, however, for determining whether pay differences between whites in job assignment A and non-whites in job assignment B reflect discriminatory behaviour (‘cross-assignment discrimination’). We test the model of such cross assignment discrimination developed by Bodvarsson and Sessions (2011) using data on Major League Baseball hitters and pitchers for four different seasons during the 1990s, a decade during which monopsony power fell. We find strong evidence of ceteris paribus racial pay differences between hitters and pitchers, as well as evidence that cross-assignment discrimination varies with labour market structure.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)84-95
Number of pages12
JournalLabour Economics
Volume28
Early online date21 Mar 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2014

Fingerprint

Major League Baseball
Discrimination
Assignment
Job assignment
Workers
Prejudice
Labour market
Minorities
Ceteris paribus
Monopsony
Market structure

Keywords

  • wage discrimination
  • complementarity
  • monopsony power

Cite this

Cross-assignment discrimination in pay : A test case of major league baseball. / Bodvarsson, Örn B.; Papps, Kerry L.; Sessions, John G.

In: Labour Economics, Vol. 28, 01.06.2014, p. 84-95.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bodvarsson, Örn B. ; Papps, Kerry L. ; Sessions, John G. / Cross-assignment discrimination in pay : A test case of major league baseball. In: Labour Economics. 2014 ; Vol. 28. pp. 84-95.
@article{5f3dc132d06445d38dc3627aa7a69972,
title = "Cross-assignment discrimination in pay: A test case of major league baseball",
abstract = "The traditional Becker/Arrow style model of discrimination depicts majority and minority workers as perfectly substitutable inputs, implying that all workers have the same job assignment. The model is only appropriate for determining whether pay differences between, for example, whites and non-whites doing job assignment A are attributable to prejudice (‘within-assignment discrimination’); It is inappropriate, however, for determining whether pay differences between whites in job assignment A and non-whites in job assignment B reflect discriminatory behaviour (‘cross-assignment discrimination’). We test the model of such cross assignment discrimination developed by Bodvarsson and Sessions (2011) using data on Major League Baseball hitters and pitchers for four different seasons during the 1990s, a decade during which monopsony power fell. We find strong evidence of ceteris paribus racial pay differences between hitters and pitchers, as well as evidence that cross-assignment discrimination varies with labour market structure.",
keywords = "wage discrimination, complementarity, monopsony power",
author = "Bodvarsson, {{\"O}rn B.} and Papps, {Kerry L.} and Sessions, {John G.}",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.labeco.2014.03.007",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "84--95",
journal = "Labour Economics",
issn = "0927-5371",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-assignment discrimination in pay

T2 - A test case of major league baseball

AU - Bodvarsson, Örn B.

AU - Papps, Kerry L.

AU - Sessions, John G.

PY - 2014/6/1

Y1 - 2014/6/1

N2 - The traditional Becker/Arrow style model of discrimination depicts majority and minority workers as perfectly substitutable inputs, implying that all workers have the same job assignment. The model is only appropriate for determining whether pay differences between, for example, whites and non-whites doing job assignment A are attributable to prejudice (‘within-assignment discrimination’); It is inappropriate, however, for determining whether pay differences between whites in job assignment A and non-whites in job assignment B reflect discriminatory behaviour (‘cross-assignment discrimination’). We test the model of such cross assignment discrimination developed by Bodvarsson and Sessions (2011) using data on Major League Baseball hitters and pitchers for four different seasons during the 1990s, a decade during which monopsony power fell. We find strong evidence of ceteris paribus racial pay differences between hitters and pitchers, as well as evidence that cross-assignment discrimination varies with labour market structure.

AB - The traditional Becker/Arrow style model of discrimination depicts majority and minority workers as perfectly substitutable inputs, implying that all workers have the same job assignment. The model is only appropriate for determining whether pay differences between, for example, whites and non-whites doing job assignment A are attributable to prejudice (‘within-assignment discrimination’); It is inappropriate, however, for determining whether pay differences between whites in job assignment A and non-whites in job assignment B reflect discriminatory behaviour (‘cross-assignment discrimination’). We test the model of such cross assignment discrimination developed by Bodvarsson and Sessions (2011) using data on Major League Baseball hitters and pitchers for four different seasons during the 1990s, a decade during which monopsony power fell. We find strong evidence of ceteris paribus racial pay differences between hitters and pitchers, as well as evidence that cross-assignment discrimination varies with labour market structure.

KW - wage discrimination

KW - complementarity

KW - monopsony power

U2 - 10.1016/j.labeco.2014.03.007

DO - 10.1016/j.labeco.2014.03.007

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 84

EP - 95

JO - Labour Economics

JF - Labour Economics

SN - 0927-5371

ER -