Criticism and outstanding leadership: An evaluation of leader reactions and critical outcomes

Dawn L Eubanks, A L Antes, T L Friedrich, J J Caughron, L V Blackwell, K E Bedell-Avers, M D Mumford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Outstanding political leaders are frequently called upon to make high-stakes decisions. Because of the controversial and highly visible nature of these issues, they often face intense criticism. Leaders' responses to criticisms not only affect follower reactions, but also the successful resolution of the contested issue. The present study examines leader and follower reactions to different types of criticisms. A historiometric approach was used to examine biographies containing criticisms of 120 world leaders and to explore leader behaviors in response to criticisms. Specifically, leader response strategies and their success in terms of follower reactions and resolution of the criticism were examined The results indicated that collaborative or confrontational leader response strategies proved most effective in terms of the leader's ability to continue forward with a particular agenda Item and to gather support of those around him or her Conversely, avoidant, diverting attention, and persuasive response strategies proved less effective.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)365-388
Number of pages24
JournalThe Leadership Quarterly
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Aptitude
criticism
leadership
leader
evaluation
follower
Criticism
Evaluation
ability

Keywords

  • followers
  • leadership
  • historiometric
  • outstanding leadership
  • criticism

Cite this

Eubanks, D. L., Antes, A. L., Friedrich, T. L., Caughron, J. J., Blackwell, L. V., Bedell-Avers, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). Criticism and outstanding leadership: An evaluation of leader reactions and critical outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 365-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.003

Criticism and outstanding leadership: An evaluation of leader reactions and critical outcomes. / Eubanks, Dawn L; Antes, A L; Friedrich, T L; Caughron, J J; Blackwell, L V; Bedell-Avers, K E; Mumford, M D.

In: The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 3, 06.2010, p. 365-388.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eubanks, DL, Antes, AL, Friedrich, TL, Caughron, JJ, Blackwell, LV, Bedell-Avers, KE & Mumford, MD 2010, 'Criticism and outstanding leadership: An evaluation of leader reactions and critical outcomes', The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 365-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.003
Eubanks DL, Antes AL, Friedrich TL, Caughron JJ, Blackwell LV, Bedell-Avers KE et al. Criticism and outstanding leadership: An evaluation of leader reactions and critical outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly. 2010 Jun;21(3):365-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.003
Eubanks, Dawn L ; Antes, A L ; Friedrich, T L ; Caughron, J J ; Blackwell, L V ; Bedell-Avers, K E ; Mumford, M D. / Criticism and outstanding leadership: An evaluation of leader reactions and critical outcomes. In: The Leadership Quarterly. 2010 ; Vol. 21, No. 3. pp. 365-388.
@article{8f338894643a4e55ab15db727d690115,
title = "Criticism and outstanding leadership: An evaluation of leader reactions and critical outcomes",
abstract = "Outstanding political leaders are frequently called upon to make high-stakes decisions. Because of the controversial and highly visible nature of these issues, they often face intense criticism. Leaders' responses to criticisms not only affect follower reactions, but also the successful resolution of the contested issue. The present study examines leader and follower reactions to different types of criticisms. A historiometric approach was used to examine biographies containing criticisms of 120 world leaders and to explore leader behaviors in response to criticisms. Specifically, leader response strategies and their success in terms of follower reactions and resolution of the criticism were examined The results indicated that collaborative or confrontational leader response strategies proved most effective in terms of the leader's ability to continue forward with a particular agenda Item and to gather support of those around him or her Conversely, avoidant, diverting attention, and persuasive response strategies proved less effective.",
keywords = "followers, leadership, historiometric, outstanding leadership, criticism",
author = "Eubanks, {Dawn L} and Antes, {A L} and Friedrich, {T L} and Caughron, {J J} and Blackwell, {L V} and Bedell-Avers, {K E} and Mumford, {M D}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.003",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "365--388",
journal = "The Leadership Quarterly",
issn = "1048-9843",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Criticism and outstanding leadership: An evaluation of leader reactions and critical outcomes

AU - Eubanks, Dawn L

AU - Antes, A L

AU - Friedrich, T L

AU - Caughron, J J

AU - Blackwell, L V

AU - Bedell-Avers, K E

AU - Mumford, M D

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Outstanding political leaders are frequently called upon to make high-stakes decisions. Because of the controversial and highly visible nature of these issues, they often face intense criticism. Leaders' responses to criticisms not only affect follower reactions, but also the successful resolution of the contested issue. The present study examines leader and follower reactions to different types of criticisms. A historiometric approach was used to examine biographies containing criticisms of 120 world leaders and to explore leader behaviors in response to criticisms. Specifically, leader response strategies and their success in terms of follower reactions and resolution of the criticism were examined The results indicated that collaborative or confrontational leader response strategies proved most effective in terms of the leader's ability to continue forward with a particular agenda Item and to gather support of those around him or her Conversely, avoidant, diverting attention, and persuasive response strategies proved less effective.

AB - Outstanding political leaders are frequently called upon to make high-stakes decisions. Because of the controversial and highly visible nature of these issues, they often face intense criticism. Leaders' responses to criticisms not only affect follower reactions, but also the successful resolution of the contested issue. The present study examines leader and follower reactions to different types of criticisms. A historiometric approach was used to examine biographies containing criticisms of 120 world leaders and to explore leader behaviors in response to criticisms. Specifically, leader response strategies and their success in terms of follower reactions and resolution of the criticism were examined The results indicated that collaborative or confrontational leader response strategies proved most effective in terms of the leader's ability to continue forward with a particular agenda Item and to gather support of those around him or her Conversely, avoidant, diverting attention, and persuasive response strategies proved less effective.

KW - followers

KW - leadership

KW - historiometric

KW - outstanding leadership

KW - criticism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953683850&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.003

U2 - 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.003

DO - 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.003

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 365

EP - 388

JO - The Leadership Quarterly

JF - The Leadership Quarterly

SN - 1048-9843

IS - 3

ER -