Critical Essay: Reconsidering critical performativity

Laure Cabantous, Jean Pascal Gond, Nancy Harding, Mark Learmonth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 40 Citations

Abstract

In recent years, we have witnessed the emergence of ‘critical performativity’, a concept designed to debate relationships between theory and practice and encourage practical interventions in organizational life. Notwithstanding its laudable ambition to stimulate discussion about engagement between critical management studies researchers and practitioners, we are concerned that critical performativity theory is flawed as it misreads foundational performativity authors, such as Austin and Butler, in ways that nullify their political potential, and ignores a range of other influential theories of performativity. It also overlooks the materiality of performativity. We review these limitations and then use three illustrations to sketch out a possible alternative conceptualization of performativity. This alternative approach, which builds on Butler’s and Callon’s work on performativity, recognizes that performativity is about the constitution of subjects, is an inherently material and discursive construct, and happens through the political engineering of sociomaterial agencements. We argue that such an approach – a political theory of organizational performativity – is more likely to deliver on both theoretical and practical fronts than the concept of critical performativity.

LanguageEnglish
Pages197-213
Number of pages17
JournalHuman Relations
Volume69
Issue number2
Early online date12 Aug 2015
DOIs
StatusPublished - 1 Feb 2016

Fingerprint

critical theory
political theory
constitution
engineering
management
Performativity

Keywords

  • Butler
  • Callon
  • critical management studies
  • critical performativity
  • engagement
  • materiality
  • performativity as politics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Critical Essay : Reconsidering critical performativity. / Cabantous, Laure; Gond, Jean Pascal; Harding, Nancy; Learmonth, Mark.

In: Human Relations, Vol. 69, No. 2, 01.02.2016, p. 197-213.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cabantous, Laure ; Gond, Jean Pascal ; Harding, Nancy ; Learmonth, Mark. / Critical Essay : Reconsidering critical performativity. In: Human Relations. 2016 ; Vol. 69, No. 2. pp. 197-213.
@article{58de254ee7f14e219d5c29e63d998b25,
title = "Critical Essay: Reconsidering critical performativity",
abstract = "In recent years, we have witnessed the emergence of ‘critical performativity’, a concept designed to debate relationships between theory and practice and encourage practical interventions in organizational life. Notwithstanding its laudable ambition to stimulate discussion about engagement between critical management studies researchers and practitioners, we are concerned that critical performativity theory is flawed as it misreads foundational performativity authors, such as Austin and Butler, in ways that nullify their political potential, and ignores a range of other influential theories of performativity. It also overlooks the materiality of performativity. We review these limitations and then use three illustrations to sketch out a possible alternative conceptualization of performativity. This alternative approach, which builds on Butler’s and Callon’s work on performativity, recognizes that performativity is about the constitution of subjects, is an inherently material and discursive construct, and happens through the political engineering of sociomaterial agencements. We argue that such an approach – a political theory of organizational performativity – is more likely to deliver on both theoretical and practical fronts than the concept of critical performativity.",
keywords = "Butler, Callon, critical management studies, critical performativity, engagement, materiality, performativity as politics",
author = "Laure Cabantous and Gond, {Jean Pascal} and Nancy Harding and Mark Learmonth",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0018726715584690",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "197--213",
journal = "Human Relations",
issn = "0018-7267",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Critical Essay

T2 - Human Relations

AU - Cabantous, Laure

AU - Gond, Jean Pascal

AU - Harding, Nancy

AU - Learmonth, Mark

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - In recent years, we have witnessed the emergence of ‘critical performativity’, a concept designed to debate relationships between theory and practice and encourage practical interventions in organizational life. Notwithstanding its laudable ambition to stimulate discussion about engagement between critical management studies researchers and practitioners, we are concerned that critical performativity theory is flawed as it misreads foundational performativity authors, such as Austin and Butler, in ways that nullify their political potential, and ignores a range of other influential theories of performativity. It also overlooks the materiality of performativity. We review these limitations and then use three illustrations to sketch out a possible alternative conceptualization of performativity. This alternative approach, which builds on Butler’s and Callon’s work on performativity, recognizes that performativity is about the constitution of subjects, is an inherently material and discursive construct, and happens through the political engineering of sociomaterial agencements. We argue that such an approach – a political theory of organizational performativity – is more likely to deliver on both theoretical and practical fronts than the concept of critical performativity.

AB - In recent years, we have witnessed the emergence of ‘critical performativity’, a concept designed to debate relationships between theory and practice and encourage practical interventions in organizational life. Notwithstanding its laudable ambition to stimulate discussion about engagement between critical management studies researchers and practitioners, we are concerned that critical performativity theory is flawed as it misreads foundational performativity authors, such as Austin and Butler, in ways that nullify their political potential, and ignores a range of other influential theories of performativity. It also overlooks the materiality of performativity. We review these limitations and then use three illustrations to sketch out a possible alternative conceptualization of performativity. This alternative approach, which builds on Butler’s and Callon’s work on performativity, recognizes that performativity is about the constitution of subjects, is an inherently material and discursive construct, and happens through the political engineering of sociomaterial agencements. We argue that such an approach – a political theory of organizational performativity – is more likely to deliver on both theoretical and practical fronts than the concept of critical performativity.

KW - Butler

KW - Callon

KW - critical management studies

KW - critical performativity

KW - engagement

KW - materiality

KW - performativity as politics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957793969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0018726715584690

DO - 10.1177/0018726715584690

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 197

EP - 213

JO - Human Relations

JF - Human Relations

SN - 0018-7267

IS - 2

ER -