Criminal cartel sanctions under the UK Enterprise Act: an assessment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The focus of this paper is on the deterrence of ‘hard core’ cartels through appropriate sanctions. The UK has the toughest provisions in the EU, with a dual system of administrative regulation and fines directed at firms and penalties, including criminal proceedings, targeted at the individuals involved. The paper considers experiences since the introduction of personal criminal sanctions for the UK's ‘cartel offence’ under the Enterprise Act 2002. Although an enforcement lag was to be expected, the threat of criminal sanctions against individuals to date has seemed more apparent than real. Problems in applying the policy are identified through an assessment in terms of the necessary prerequisites for the successful criminalisation of antitrust offences proposed by Wils (2005) and ongoing developments in the UK are discussed. The findings shed some light on the difficulties of introducing effective criminal sanctions on individual cartel behaviour at Member State level and suggest more general consideration be given to non criminal director disqualifications.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-86
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal of the Economics of Business
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Cartel
Sanctions
Threat
Penalty
Deterrence
Lag
Enforcement
Cartels

Cite this

Criminal cartel sanctions under the UK Enterprise Act: an assessment. / Morgan, Eleanor J.

In: International Journal of the Economics of Business, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2010, p. 67-86.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{86dc0fad8cb54b588f037ccc7e6b7515,
title = "Criminal cartel sanctions under the UK Enterprise Act: an assessment",
abstract = "The focus of this paper is on the deterrence of ‘hard core’ cartels through appropriate sanctions. The UK has the toughest provisions in the EU, with a dual system of administrative regulation and fines directed at firms and penalties, including criminal proceedings, targeted at the individuals involved. The paper considers experiences since the introduction of personal criminal sanctions for the UK's ‘cartel offence’ under the Enterprise Act 2002. Although an enforcement lag was to be expected, the threat of criminal sanctions against individuals to date has seemed more apparent than real. Problems in applying the policy are identified through an assessment in terms of the necessary prerequisites for the successful criminalisation of antitrust offences proposed by Wils (2005) and ongoing developments in the UK are discussed. The findings shed some light on the difficulties of introducing effective criminal sanctions on individual cartel behaviour at Member State level and suggest more general consideration be given to non criminal director disqualifications.",
author = "Morgan, {Eleanor J}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1080/13571510903516953",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "67--86",
journal = "International Journal of the Economics of Business",
issn = "1357-1516",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Criminal cartel sanctions under the UK Enterprise Act: an assessment

AU - Morgan, Eleanor J

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The focus of this paper is on the deterrence of ‘hard core’ cartels through appropriate sanctions. The UK has the toughest provisions in the EU, with a dual system of administrative regulation and fines directed at firms and penalties, including criminal proceedings, targeted at the individuals involved. The paper considers experiences since the introduction of personal criminal sanctions for the UK's ‘cartel offence’ under the Enterprise Act 2002. Although an enforcement lag was to be expected, the threat of criminal sanctions against individuals to date has seemed more apparent than real. Problems in applying the policy are identified through an assessment in terms of the necessary prerequisites for the successful criminalisation of antitrust offences proposed by Wils (2005) and ongoing developments in the UK are discussed. The findings shed some light on the difficulties of introducing effective criminal sanctions on individual cartel behaviour at Member State level and suggest more general consideration be given to non criminal director disqualifications.

AB - The focus of this paper is on the deterrence of ‘hard core’ cartels through appropriate sanctions. The UK has the toughest provisions in the EU, with a dual system of administrative regulation and fines directed at firms and penalties, including criminal proceedings, targeted at the individuals involved. The paper considers experiences since the introduction of personal criminal sanctions for the UK's ‘cartel offence’ under the Enterprise Act 2002. Although an enforcement lag was to be expected, the threat of criminal sanctions against individuals to date has seemed more apparent than real. Problems in applying the policy are identified through an assessment in terms of the necessary prerequisites for the successful criminalisation of antitrust offences proposed by Wils (2005) and ongoing developments in the UK are discussed. The findings shed some light on the difficulties of introducing effective criminal sanctions on individual cartel behaviour at Member State level and suggest more general consideration be given to non criminal director disqualifications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76549107679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13571510903516953

U2 - 10.1080/13571510903516953

DO - 10.1080/13571510903516953

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 67

EP - 86

JO - International Journal of the Economics of Business

JF - International Journal of the Economics of Business

SN - 1357-1516

IS - 1

ER -