Abstract
International Accounting Standard 38 Intangible Assets mandates that development costs must be capitalized if certain conditions specified in the standard are met. However, this requires managerial judgement and hence may be subject to opportunism. Corruption is a permeable informal country characteristic that penetrates firms’ behaviour, influencing corporate misconduct. We conjecture that an environment with high corruption facilitates management in their justification of meeting the capitalization criteria of assets that should have been expensed, either partly or entirely. Effectively, these capitalized assets will not generate the future economic benefits implicitly conveyed by their recognition. This recognition, however, sends positive (albeit distorted) market signals for future earnings and increases current year reported earnings. We find that there is a positive relation between country-level corruption and the amount of development costs capitalized in a given year. Moreover, the higher the levels of country corruption, the lower the contribution of capitalized development costs in a given year to future profitability. Finally, this association is moderated by companies’ levels of internationalization.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 100821 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-25 |
Number of pages | 25 |
Journal | British Accounting Review |
Volume | 51 |
Issue number | 5 |
Early online date | 18 Feb 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2019 |
Keywords
- R&D
- IFRS
- corruption
- accounting choice
- future performance
- internationalization
- Sustainability
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Country-level corruption and accounting choice: : research & development capitalization under IFRS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Fanis Tsoligkas
- Management - Senior Lecturer (Associate Professor)
- Accounting, Finance & Law
- Centre for Future of Work
Person: Research & Teaching