Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cost-effectiveness of school-based interventions for well-being and mental health literacy of pupils in year 9 in England: AWARE cluster randomised controlled trial

  • Kyann Zhang
  • , Derek King
  • , Jan Boehnke
  • , Jessica Deighton
  • , Abigail Thompson
  • , Emma Thornton
  • , Christopher Knowles
  • , Daniel Hayes
  • , Paul Stallard
  • , Joao Santos
  • , Emma Ashworth
  • , Sara E. Evans-Lacko
  • London School of Economics
  • Abertay University
  • University College London
  • Evidence Based Practice Unit
  • University of Manchester
  • Liverpool John Moores University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background AWARE (Approaches for Wellbeing and Mental Health Literacy: Research in Education) is a three-arm, parallel-group, cluster randomised controlled trial. It assessed the effectiveness of two interventions-the Youth Aware of Mental Health (YAM) programme and Mental Health and High School Curriculum Guide-in addressing emotional well-being, compared with usual practice, among year 9 students in England. Aims To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of YAM and The Guide to inform policy decisions regarding the implementation of these mental health interventions in schools. Method Cost-effectiveness was assessed using self-reported information from participants in the trial at baseline and two follow-ups-at 3–6 months after the start of intervention, and at 9–12 months post-intervention. Quality of life was measured with the Child Health Utility Index. Intervention delivery costs were calculated with data provided by the delivery teams. Service use costs were calculated with a short version of the Client Service Receipt Inventory, with unit costs obtained from publicly available sources. Results For both interventions, difference in outcomes (change in quality-adjusted life-years over time) between the intervention group and control group were close to zero, with the largest change being an improvement of 0.0055 quality-adjusted life-years at the second follow-up for students in schools randomised to YAM. Changes in costs were likewise small. Conclusions At first follow-up, neither intervention is likely to be considered cost-effective. At second follow-up, YAM has a high probability of being considered cost-effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of around £23 000 per unit of improvement in the quality-of-life measure, which falls within the threshold (£20 000 to £30 000) as used by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere155
Number of pages8
JournalBJPsych Open
Volume12
Issue number4
Early online date8 Jun 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jul 2026

Data Availability Statement

An anonymised data-set will be made publicly available in the future (planned for 2026).

Funding

This research was commissioned and funded by the UK Department for Education. The commissioner and funder of the study had no role in data collection, data analysis, data interpretation or writing of the report.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • cost-effectiveness analysis
  • education
  • health economics
  • Mental health
  • quality of life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-effectiveness of school-based interventions for well-being and mental health literacy of pupils in year 9 in England: AWARE cluster randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this