Abstract

Renewable generation is a key component in our generation mix to meet increasing electricity demand and decarburization targets. However, due to the constrained network capacity, a large volume of renewable generation is curtailed. There are typically three approaches to deal with excessive renewable: directly curtailed, reinforcing networks to expand transfer capacity, or converted into hydrogen to be transported. However, the costs and benefits of three approaches could vary significantly. This paper uses a 16 bus-bar UK network to analyze the performance of the three approaches. UK 2020 generation mix is used to quantify the saved energy from renewable and the triggered costs by using the approaches. The payback time and net present value (NPV) of the two investment techniques are also compared. From demonstration, it is reasonable to conclude that blending hydrogen from renewable is an environmentally friendly and cost-effective way to address wind curtailment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1759-1764
Number of pages6
JournalEnergy Procedia
Volume142
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2017
Event9th International Conference on Applied Energy, ICAE 2017 - Cardiff, UK United Kingdom
Duration: 21 Aug 201724 Aug 2017

Keywords

  • Blending Hydrogen
  • Cost-benefit Analysis
  • Electrolysis
  • Wind curtailment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy(all)

Cite this

Cost-benefit Comparison of Different Techniques for Addressing Wind Curtailment. / Yan, Xiaohe; Gu, Chenghong; Li, Furong; Ai, Qian.

In: Energy Procedia, Vol. 142, 01.12.2017, p. 1759-1764.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

@article{b747efd7c25342fabd03474aa93b204b,
title = "Cost-benefit Comparison of Different Techniques for Addressing Wind Curtailment",
abstract = "Renewable generation is a key component in our generation mix to meet increasing electricity demand and decarburization targets. However, due to the constrained network capacity, a large volume of renewable generation is curtailed. There are typically three approaches to deal with excessive renewable: directly curtailed, reinforcing networks to expand transfer capacity, or converted into hydrogen to be transported. However, the costs and benefits of three approaches could vary significantly. This paper uses a 16 bus-bar UK network to analyze the performance of the three approaches. UK 2020 generation mix is used to quantify the saved energy from renewable and the triggered costs by using the approaches. The payback time and net present value (NPV) of the two investment techniques are also compared. From demonstration, it is reasonable to conclude that blending hydrogen from renewable is an environmentally friendly and cost-effective way to address wind curtailment.",
keywords = "Blending Hydrogen, Cost-benefit Analysis, Electrolysis, Wind curtailment",
author = "Xiaohe Yan and Chenghong Gu and Furong Li and Qian Ai",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.560",
language = "English",
volume = "142",
pages = "1759--1764",
journal = "Energy Procedia",
issn = "1876-6102",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost-benefit Comparison of Different Techniques for Addressing Wind Curtailment

AU - Yan, Xiaohe

AU - Gu, Chenghong

AU - Li, Furong

AU - Ai, Qian

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Renewable generation is a key component in our generation mix to meet increasing electricity demand and decarburization targets. However, due to the constrained network capacity, a large volume of renewable generation is curtailed. There are typically three approaches to deal with excessive renewable: directly curtailed, reinforcing networks to expand transfer capacity, or converted into hydrogen to be transported. However, the costs and benefits of three approaches could vary significantly. This paper uses a 16 bus-bar UK network to analyze the performance of the three approaches. UK 2020 generation mix is used to quantify the saved energy from renewable and the triggered costs by using the approaches. The payback time and net present value (NPV) of the two investment techniques are also compared. From demonstration, it is reasonable to conclude that blending hydrogen from renewable is an environmentally friendly and cost-effective way to address wind curtailment.

AB - Renewable generation is a key component in our generation mix to meet increasing electricity demand and decarburization targets. However, due to the constrained network capacity, a large volume of renewable generation is curtailed. There are typically three approaches to deal with excessive renewable: directly curtailed, reinforcing networks to expand transfer capacity, or converted into hydrogen to be transported. However, the costs and benefits of three approaches could vary significantly. This paper uses a 16 bus-bar UK network to analyze the performance of the three approaches. UK 2020 generation mix is used to quantify the saved energy from renewable and the triggered costs by using the approaches. The payback time and net present value (NPV) of the two investment techniques are also compared. From demonstration, it is reasonable to conclude that blending hydrogen from renewable is an environmentally friendly and cost-effective way to address wind curtailment.

KW - Blending Hydrogen

KW - Cost-benefit Analysis

KW - Electrolysis

KW - Wind curtailment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041524245&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.560

DO - 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.560

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:85041524245

VL - 142

SP - 1759

EP - 1764

JO - Energy Procedia

JF - Energy Procedia

SN - 1876-6102

ER -