TY - JOUR
T1 - Correction for “Conserved transcriptomic profiles underpin monogamy across vertebrates,”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America(2019)116 (1331–1336)Doi:10.1073/pnas.1813775116)
AU - Young, Rebecca L.
AU - Ferkin, Michael H.
AU - Ockendon-Powell, Nina F.
AU - Orr, Veronica N.
AU - Phelps, Steven M.
AU - Pogány, Ákos
AU - Richards-Zawacki, Corinne L.
AU - Summers, Kyle
AU - Székely, Tamás
AU - Trainor, Brian C.
AU - Urrutia, Araxi O.
AU - Zachar, Gergely
AU - O’Connell, Lauren A.
AU - Hofmann, Hans A.
PY - 2019/5/14
Y1 - 2019/5/14
N2 - which was first published January 22, 2019; 10.1073/pnas.1813775116 (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:1331–1336). The authors wish to note the following: “When conducting the DESeq2 analyses on the orthologous gene groups (OGGs), the wrong data frame was called in R due to a naming error. Because of how different data frames were generated throughout the analysis pipeline, this error was reproduced consistently, introducing a systematic error. The numbers of concordantly regulated OGGs as shown in the various panels of Fig. 3 in the main paper have now been updated. Instead of the original 123 genes, there are now 121 genes, with 50 genes maintained in the corrected analysis. “In addition, the heatmap of candidate genes shown in the original Fig. 5 is incomplete: In the corrected analysis, there are 42 candidate genes that fit our candidate gene criteria [i.e., significant in DESeq2 analysis of all clades, greater than ±1 log2 fold-difference between the species pairs, and above threshold in 6 of 10 Rank-Rank Hypergeometric Overlap (RRHO) pairwise analyses]. This list contains all but 4 of the 24 genes previously reported in Fig. 5.” The corrected Fig. 3 and Fig. 5 appear below, along with their respective legends; the legend for Fig. 3 has been corrected. For the supporting information, the SI Appendix has been updated online to correct Fig. S5, its legend, and Table S7; and Datasets S1 and S2 have also been corrected online.
AB - which was first published January 22, 2019; 10.1073/pnas.1813775116 (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:1331–1336). The authors wish to note the following: “When conducting the DESeq2 analyses on the orthologous gene groups (OGGs), the wrong data frame was called in R due to a naming error. Because of how different data frames were generated throughout the analysis pipeline, this error was reproduced consistently, introducing a systematic error. The numbers of concordantly regulated OGGs as shown in the various panels of Fig. 3 in the main paper have now been updated. Instead of the original 123 genes, there are now 121 genes, with 50 genes maintained in the corrected analysis. “In addition, the heatmap of candidate genes shown in the original Fig. 5 is incomplete: In the corrected analysis, there are 42 candidate genes that fit our candidate gene criteria [i.e., significant in DESeq2 analysis of all clades, greater than ±1 log2 fold-difference between the species pairs, and above threshold in 6 of 10 Rank-Rank Hypergeometric Overlap (RRHO) pairwise analyses]. This list contains all but 4 of the 24 genes previously reported in Fig. 5.” The corrected Fig. 3 and Fig. 5 appear below, along with their respective legends; the legend for Fig. 3 has been corrected. For the supporting information, the SI Appendix has been updated online to correct Fig. S5, its legend, and Table S7; and Datasets S1 and S2 have also been corrected online.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065735249&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1906161116
DO - 10.1073/pnas.1906161116
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 31036659
AN - SCOPUS:85065735249
SN - 0027-8424
VL - 116
SP - 10186
EP - 10188
JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IS - 20
ER -