Corporate political strategies in weak institutional environments: A break from conventions

Tahiru Liedong, Daniel Aghanya, Tazeeb Rajwani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

There is a lack of research about the political strategies used by firms in emerging countries, mainly because the literature often assumes that Western-oriented corporate political activity (CPA) has universal application. Drawing on resource-dependency logics, we explore why and how firms orchestrate CPA in the institutionally challenging context of Nigeria. Our findings show that firms deploy four context-fitting but ethically suspect political strategies: affective, financial, pseudo-attribution and kinship strategies. We leverage this understanding to contribute to CPA in emerging countries by arguing that corporate political strategies are shaped by the reciprocity and duality of dependency relationships between firms and politicians, and also by advancing that these strategies reflect institutional weaknesses and unique industry-level opportunities. Importantly, we shed light on the muttered dark side of CPA. We develop a CPA framework and discuss the research, practical and policy implications of our findings.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)855-876
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume161
Early online date12 Nov 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2020

Keywords

  • Corporate political activity (CPA)
  • Corporate social responsibility (CSR)
  • Ethics
  • Nigeria
  • Resource dependency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Law

Cite this