Corporate Political Activities and the SEC’s Oversight Role in the IPO Process

Dimitrios Gounopoulos, George Loukopoulos, Panagiotis Loukopoulos, Geoffrey Wood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (SciVal)


We study how a regulator (Securities and Exchanges Commission; SEC) responds to IPOs that have a higher political profile. We find that IPOs with issuers (intermediaries) that actively pursue political strategies receive more (less) SEC comment letters than IPOs without such actors. Cross-sectional analysis reveals that the IPO's political environment moderates the relationship between social pressure for more corporate transparency and SEC scrutiny. Additional tests indicate that the political activities of issuers (intermediaries) contribute to a less (more) efficient IPO process. Overall, our findings suggest that politically active intermediaries have stronger incentives to accurately portray the IPO financial reporting environment than politically active issuers because they have greater reputational and political capital at stake; quite simply, the former have more to lose. We draw out the implications for theory, in terms of agency and reputation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)375-412
JournalJournal of Management Studies
Issue number2
Early online date24 Nov 2022
Publication statusPublished - 31 Mar 2024


  • Initial Public Offerings (IPOs)
  • SEC comment letters
  • Security and Exchanges Commission
  • agency theory
  • campaign funding
  • corporate political activities
  • financial intermediaries
  • information asymmetry
  • political money contributions
  • reputation theory
  • state capture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation


Dive into the research topics of 'Corporate Political Activities and the SEC’s Oversight Role in the IPO Process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this