Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Coping with Emotionally Challenging Research: Developing a Strategic Approach to Researcher Wellbeing

Tina Skinner, Kristine Brance, Sarah Halligan, Emily Tsang, Heather Girling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

While previous work has highlighted the possible impacts of undertaking emotionally challenging research, it is only recently, particularly within the UK with the 2028 Research Excellence Framework focus on research culture, that this subject is starting to gain senior leadership attention. Funded by the UK Research and Innovation, Researcher England, Enhancing Research Culture fund. We undertook an in-depth study involving researchers across topics and disciplines in the humanities and social science, with the objectives of establishing: the impacts of studying emotionally challenging topics on researchers, what they currently found helpful in preventing and/or coping with these impacts, and what additional support they wanted. In this paper we report on findings related to the latter two objectives to provide insight into how future research projects could be ethically designed to minimize distress, secondary and vicarious trauma in researchers. We then use these findings to formulate an innovative strategic institutional response to researcher wellbeing and emotionally challenging studies that can be implemented in three stages: Bronze, which is focused on awareness raising and the development of policies and guidance that are built into ethical procedures; Silver, involving the establishment of training, clear referral pathways, and (funded) Researcher Wellbeing Plans - including regular academic supervision, team working, and extra time in workloads to undertake wellbeing interventions - built into the design of projects; and Gold, a wholistic institutional response where, in addition to the above, policies, processes, practices and culture are proactively attentive to the prevention of and provision for distress relating to emotionally challenging research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2559-2583
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Academic Ethics
Volume23
Issue number4
Early online date25 Aug 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2025

Acknowledgements

We are also very grateful to Gene Feder, Claire Lodge and Jon Huntley for helping us develop the definition of ‘independent wellbeing supervision’ used in this article, as well as for the supportive critical engagement of the responding editor and independent peer reviewers. In the highly competitive time pressured environment of academia the generosity of people who took the time to provide their thoughtful comments was much appreciated.

Funding

We would like to thank the University of Bath and the UKRI Research England Research Culture fund for supporting this project, as well as the participants for giving us their time, stories and incites. We are also very grateful to Gene Feder, Claire Lodge and Jon Huntley for helping us develop the definition of ‘independent wellbeing supervision’ used in this article, as well as for the supportive critical engagement of the responding editor and independent peer reviewers. In the highly competitive time pressured environment of academia the generosity of people who took the time to provide their thoughtful comments was much appreciated.

FundersFunder number
University of Bath
UK Research and Innovation

    Keywords

    • Coping
    • Distress
    • Emotional
    • Research
    • Secondary trauma
    • Vicarious trauma
    • Wellbeing

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Education
    • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Philosophy

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Coping with Emotionally Challenging Research: Developing a Strategic Approach to Researcher Wellbeing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this