Contrasting views of public engagement on local government data use in the UK

Emily Rempel, Julie Barne, Hannah Durrant

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Government at all levels in the UK and around the world face increasing challenges in regulating and governing their own use of data and data technologies, including at the local level. At the same time publics are increasingly aware of and critical towards incidents of data misuse and unethical data technology development. One solution to addressing these socio-technical questions of good government data use is public debate and inclusion through public engagement. In order to empirically develop a base on which such public engagement could rest, our aim is to compare and contrast different views on public engagement on government data use in the UK. We conducted a series of seven focus groups with government, technical, and nontechnical publics on this topic. Transcripts from these focus groups were thematically analysed by group for common themes. All three groups expressed wariness towards increased data collection and monitoring, as well as a sense of criticism on whether local governments use data effectively in policy decision-making. In discussing their views of public engagement, the technical and government groups expressed concerns on the 'public' being data illiterate and all three groups imagined the 'public' as disinterested in data use and policy-making. In contrast, good public engagement was described as focusing both on the means and ends of policy-making with data, being influential on local government process, and offering multiple mechanisms of participation. In conclusion, while good public engagement is imagined as empowering and beneficial to publics and data technology development alike, participants struggled to imagine a public that would be interested in public engagement exercises. is suggests a first step in developing public engagement exercises on government data use within the UK is reflecting on the mechanisms that may lead to an actual or assumed disinterested and unaware public.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationICEGOV 2019, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery
Pages118-128
Number of pages11
VolumePart F148155
ISBN (Print)9781450366441
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019
Event12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ICEGOV 2019 - Melbourne, Australia
Duration: 3 Apr 20195 Apr 2019

Publication series

NameACM International Conference proceeding Series

Conference

Conference12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ICEGOV 2019
CountryAustralia
CityMelbourne
Period3/04/195/04/19

Keywords

  • Data Ethics
  • Data Science
  • Local Government
  • Public Engagement
  • Public Participation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Software

Cite this

Rempel, E., Barne, J., & Durrant, H. (2019). Contrasting views of public engagement on local government data use in the UK. In ICEGOV 2019, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (Vol. Part F148155, pp. 118-128). (ACM International Conference proceeding Series). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3326365.3326381

Contrasting views of public engagement on local government data use in the UK. / Rempel, Emily; Barne, Julie; Durrant, Hannah.

ICEGOV 2019, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. Vol. Part F148155 Association for Computing Machinery, 2019. p. 118-128 (ACM International Conference proceeding Series).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Rempel, E, Barne, J & Durrant, H 2019, Contrasting views of public engagement on local government data use in the UK. in ICEGOV 2019, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. vol. Part F148155, ACM International Conference proceeding Series, Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 118-128, 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ICEGOV 2019, Melbourne, Australia, 3/04/19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3326365.3326381
Rempel E, Barne J, Durrant H. Contrasting views of public engagement on local government data use in the UK. In ICEGOV 2019, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. Vol. Part F148155. Association for Computing Machinery. 2019. p. 118-128. (ACM International Conference proceeding Series). https://doi.org/10.1145/3326365.3326381
Rempel, Emily ; Barne, Julie ; Durrant, Hannah. / Contrasting views of public engagement on local government data use in the UK. ICEGOV 2019, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. Vol. Part F148155 Association for Computing Machinery, 2019. pp. 118-128 (ACM International Conference proceeding Series).
@inproceedings{cdd4d45262834b999c0b4775d0280ddc,
title = "Contrasting views of public engagement on local government data use in the UK",
abstract = "Government at all levels in the UK and around the world face increasing challenges in regulating and governing their own use of data and data technologies, including at the local level. At the same time publics are increasingly aware of and critical towards incidents of data misuse and unethical data technology development. One solution to addressing these socio-technical questions of good government data use is public debate and inclusion through public engagement. In order to empirically develop a base on which such public engagement could rest, our aim is to compare and contrast different views on public engagement on government data use in the UK. We conducted a series of seven focus groups with government, technical, and nontechnical publics on this topic. Transcripts from these focus groups were thematically analysed by group for common themes. All three groups expressed wariness towards increased data collection and monitoring, as well as a sense of criticism on whether local governments use data effectively in policy decision-making. In discussing their views of public engagement, the technical and government groups expressed concerns on the 'public' being data illiterate and all three groups imagined the 'public' as disinterested in data use and policy-making. In contrast, good public engagement was described as focusing both on the means and ends of policy-making with data, being influential on local government process, and offering multiple mechanisms of participation. In conclusion, while good public engagement is imagined as empowering and beneficial to publics and data technology development alike, participants struggled to imagine a public that would be interested in public engagement exercises. is suggests a first step in developing public engagement exercises on government data use within the UK is reflecting on the mechanisms that may lead to an actual or assumed disinterested and unaware public.",
keywords = "Data Ethics, Data Science, Local Government, Public Engagement, Public Participation",
author = "Emily Rempel and Julie Barne and Hannah Durrant",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1145/3326365.3326381",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781450366441",
volume = "Part F148155",
series = "ACM International Conference proceeding Series",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery",
pages = "118--128",
booktitle = "ICEGOV 2019, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on theory and Practice of Electronic Governance",
address = "USA United States",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Contrasting views of public engagement on local government data use in the UK

AU - Rempel, Emily

AU - Barne, Julie

AU - Durrant, Hannah

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Government at all levels in the UK and around the world face increasing challenges in regulating and governing their own use of data and data technologies, including at the local level. At the same time publics are increasingly aware of and critical towards incidents of data misuse and unethical data technology development. One solution to addressing these socio-technical questions of good government data use is public debate and inclusion through public engagement. In order to empirically develop a base on which such public engagement could rest, our aim is to compare and contrast different views on public engagement on government data use in the UK. We conducted a series of seven focus groups with government, technical, and nontechnical publics on this topic. Transcripts from these focus groups were thematically analysed by group for common themes. All three groups expressed wariness towards increased data collection and monitoring, as well as a sense of criticism on whether local governments use data effectively in policy decision-making. In discussing their views of public engagement, the technical and government groups expressed concerns on the 'public' being data illiterate and all three groups imagined the 'public' as disinterested in data use and policy-making. In contrast, good public engagement was described as focusing both on the means and ends of policy-making with data, being influential on local government process, and offering multiple mechanisms of participation. In conclusion, while good public engagement is imagined as empowering and beneficial to publics and data technology development alike, participants struggled to imagine a public that would be interested in public engagement exercises. is suggests a first step in developing public engagement exercises on government data use within the UK is reflecting on the mechanisms that may lead to an actual or assumed disinterested and unaware public.

AB - Government at all levels in the UK and around the world face increasing challenges in regulating and governing their own use of data and data technologies, including at the local level. At the same time publics are increasingly aware of and critical towards incidents of data misuse and unethical data technology development. One solution to addressing these socio-technical questions of good government data use is public debate and inclusion through public engagement. In order to empirically develop a base on which such public engagement could rest, our aim is to compare and contrast different views on public engagement on government data use in the UK. We conducted a series of seven focus groups with government, technical, and nontechnical publics on this topic. Transcripts from these focus groups were thematically analysed by group for common themes. All three groups expressed wariness towards increased data collection and monitoring, as well as a sense of criticism on whether local governments use data effectively in policy decision-making. In discussing their views of public engagement, the technical and government groups expressed concerns on the 'public' being data illiterate and all three groups imagined the 'public' as disinterested in data use and policy-making. In contrast, good public engagement was described as focusing both on the means and ends of policy-making with data, being influential on local government process, and offering multiple mechanisms of participation. In conclusion, while good public engagement is imagined as empowering and beneficial to publics and data technology development alike, participants struggled to imagine a public that would be interested in public engagement exercises. is suggests a first step in developing public engagement exercises on government data use within the UK is reflecting on the mechanisms that may lead to an actual or assumed disinterested and unaware public.

KW - Data Ethics

KW - Data Science

KW - Local Government

KW - Public Engagement

KW - Public Participation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066630306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/3326365.3326381

DO - 10.1145/3326365.3326381

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781450366441

VL - Part F148155

T3 - ACM International Conference proceeding Series

SP - 118

EP - 128

BT - ICEGOV 2019, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on theory and Practice of Electronic Governance

PB - Association for Computing Machinery

ER -