Contesting the value of "creating shared value"

Andrew Crane, Guido Palazzo, Laura J. Spence, Dirk Matten

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

548 Citations (SciVal)


This article critiques Porter and Kramer's concept of creating shared value. The strengths of the idea are highlighted in terms of its popularity among practitioner and academic audiences, its connecting of strategy and social goals, and its systematizing of some previously underdeveloped, disconnected areas of research and practice. However, the concept suffers from some serious shortcomings, namely: it is unoriginal; it ignores the tensions inherent to responsible business activity; it is naïve about business compliance; and it is based on a shallow conception of the corporation's role in society. [Michael Porter and Mark Kramer were invited to respond to this article. Their commentary follows along with a reply by Crane and his co-authors.]

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)130-153
Number of pages24
JournalCalifornia Management Review
Issue number2
Early online date1 Feb 2014
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2014


  • Business and society
  • Corporate social responsibility
  • Ethics
  • Partnerships
  • Philanthropy
  • Stakeholders


Dive into the research topics of 'Contesting the value of "creating shared value"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this