Consumers Prefer System 2 Marketing Tactics: Dual Process Intuitions: Consumers’ Beliefs about Persuasion Processing Drive Morality of Marketing Communication

Zarema Khon, Yvetta Simonyan, Haiming Hang, Yi-Ju Chen, Samuel G. B. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

Abstract

Not every form of marketing persuasion is considered manipulative. How
do consumers decide whether persuasion is morally acceptable or not?
In three studies, we test the hypotheses that moral evaluation of
persuasion depends on individuals’ beliefs about information
processing—Dual Process Intuitions: (i) If people think persuasion is
processed fast and without much effort (that is, by system 1), they will
consider it more immoral than persuasion thought to be processed more
slowly and with much effort (that is, by system 2). This is because (ii)
people will find system 1 processing more automatic than system 2
processing. Since system 2 persuasion will be seen as more morally
acceptable, (iii) there will be a larger effect of system 2 persuasion on
attitude change than that of system 1 (although both system 1 and
system 2 persuasion can lead to a positive attitude change). (See
conceptual framework on the right.)
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 11 Feb 2022
EventSociety of Judgement and Decision Making - Virtual, USA United States
Duration: 9 Feb 202212 Feb 2022
Conference number: 42
https://sjdm.org/programs/2021-program.pdf

Conference

ConferenceSociety of Judgement and Decision Making
Abbreviated titleSJDM
Country/TerritoryUSA United States
Period9/02/2212/02/22
Internet address

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Consumers Prefer System 2 Marketing Tactics: Dual Process Intuitions: Consumers’ Beliefs about Persuasion Processing Drive Morality of Marketing Communication'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this