Consumer perceptions of free-range laying hen welfare

Isabelle Claire Pettersson, Claire Alexandra Weeks, Lorna Rachel Maven Wilson, Christine Janet Nicol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)
192 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to understand which factors and resources free-range egg consumers believe are important for hen welfare. Design/methodology/approach – An online survey was distributed via the mailing list of a UK free-range egg brand receiving 6,378 responses. The survey was mostly five-point Likert-scale based. The same survey was also distributed to a group of animal welfare specialists receiving 34 responses. Findings – Respondents bought free-range eggs because hens are “happier” (74.2 per cent) and “healthier” (69.0 per cent) and because they believed such eggs to taste better (57.9 per cent). They rated all the suggested factors that might contribute to hen welfare as “important” or “very important” (on average) but believed outside access and fresh air to be most important. Respondents rated the suitability of resources relating to behavioural needs high (“suitable” or “very suitable”) indoors and shelter as the most suitable outdoors. Consumers differed from welfare specialists in their views on factors contributing to hen welfare, but their views on resource suitability were similar. Research limitations/implications – The sample was biased towards free-range egg consumers who had expressed an interest in a brand marketed as high welfare. Originality/value – This is the first study to ask consumers what they consider to be important for hen welfare and how they think hen welfare can be improved. Because consumers can affect on-farm welfare through their purchasing habits assessing the degree of agreement between consumers and animal welfare specialists is important.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1999-2013
Number of pages15
JournalBritish Food Journal
Volume118
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2016

Fingerprint

consumer attitudes
laying hens
hens
Ovum
Animal Welfare
Eggs
animal welfare
Habits
purchasing
Air
Surveys and Questionnaires
Consumer perceptions
air
farms
Research
Egg

Keywords

  • Consumer perceptions
  • Free-range
  • Laying hens

Cite this

Consumer perceptions of free-range laying hen welfare. / Pettersson, Isabelle Claire; Weeks, Claire Alexandra; Wilson, Lorna Rachel Maven; Nicol, Christine Janet.

In: British Food Journal, Vol. 118, No. 8, 01.08.2016, p. 1999-2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pettersson, Isabelle Claire ; Weeks, Claire Alexandra ; Wilson, Lorna Rachel Maven ; Nicol, Christine Janet. / Consumer perceptions of free-range laying hen welfare. In: British Food Journal. 2016 ; Vol. 118, No. 8. pp. 1999-2013.
@article{e007d87491d64551a57bdb1a69b9398c,
title = "Consumer perceptions of free-range laying hen welfare",
abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to understand which factors and resources free-range egg consumers believe are important for hen welfare. Design/methodology/approach – An online survey was distributed via the mailing list of a UK free-range egg brand receiving 6,378 responses. The survey was mostly five-point Likert-scale based. The same survey was also distributed to a group of animal welfare specialists receiving 34 responses. Findings – Respondents bought free-range eggs because hens are “happier” (74.2 per cent) and “healthier” (69.0 per cent) and because they believed such eggs to taste better (57.9 per cent). They rated all the suggested factors that might contribute to hen welfare as “important” or “very important” (on average) but believed outside access and fresh air to be most important. Respondents rated the suitability of resources relating to behavioural needs high (“suitable” or “very suitable”) indoors and shelter as the most suitable outdoors. Consumers differed from welfare specialists in their views on factors contributing to hen welfare, but their views on resource suitability were similar. Research limitations/implications – The sample was biased towards free-range egg consumers who had expressed an interest in a brand marketed as high welfare. Originality/value – This is the first study to ask consumers what they consider to be important for hen welfare and how they think hen welfare can be improved. Because consumers can affect on-farm welfare through their purchasing habits assessing the degree of agreement between consumers and animal welfare specialists is important.",
keywords = "Consumer perceptions, Free-range, Laying hens",
author = "Pettersson, {Isabelle Claire} and Weeks, {Claire Alexandra} and Wilson, {Lorna Rachel Maven} and Nicol, {Christine Janet}",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/BFJ-02-2016-0065",
language = "English",
volume = "118",
pages = "1999--2013",
journal = "British Food Journal",
issn = "0007-070X",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consumer perceptions of free-range laying hen welfare

AU - Pettersson, Isabelle Claire

AU - Weeks, Claire Alexandra

AU - Wilson, Lorna Rachel Maven

AU - Nicol, Christine Janet

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to understand which factors and resources free-range egg consumers believe are important for hen welfare. Design/methodology/approach – An online survey was distributed via the mailing list of a UK free-range egg brand receiving 6,378 responses. The survey was mostly five-point Likert-scale based. The same survey was also distributed to a group of animal welfare specialists receiving 34 responses. Findings – Respondents bought free-range eggs because hens are “happier” (74.2 per cent) and “healthier” (69.0 per cent) and because they believed such eggs to taste better (57.9 per cent). They rated all the suggested factors that might contribute to hen welfare as “important” or “very important” (on average) but believed outside access and fresh air to be most important. Respondents rated the suitability of resources relating to behavioural needs high (“suitable” or “very suitable”) indoors and shelter as the most suitable outdoors. Consumers differed from welfare specialists in their views on factors contributing to hen welfare, but their views on resource suitability were similar. Research limitations/implications – The sample was biased towards free-range egg consumers who had expressed an interest in a brand marketed as high welfare. Originality/value – This is the first study to ask consumers what they consider to be important for hen welfare and how they think hen welfare can be improved. Because consumers can affect on-farm welfare through their purchasing habits assessing the degree of agreement between consumers and animal welfare specialists is important.

AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to understand which factors and resources free-range egg consumers believe are important for hen welfare. Design/methodology/approach – An online survey was distributed via the mailing list of a UK free-range egg brand receiving 6,378 responses. The survey was mostly five-point Likert-scale based. The same survey was also distributed to a group of animal welfare specialists receiving 34 responses. Findings – Respondents bought free-range eggs because hens are “happier” (74.2 per cent) and “healthier” (69.0 per cent) and because they believed such eggs to taste better (57.9 per cent). They rated all the suggested factors that might contribute to hen welfare as “important” or “very important” (on average) but believed outside access and fresh air to be most important. Respondents rated the suitability of resources relating to behavioural needs high (“suitable” or “very suitable”) indoors and shelter as the most suitable outdoors. Consumers differed from welfare specialists in their views on factors contributing to hen welfare, but their views on resource suitability were similar. Research limitations/implications – The sample was biased towards free-range egg consumers who had expressed an interest in a brand marketed as high welfare. Originality/value – This is the first study to ask consumers what they consider to be important for hen welfare and how they think hen welfare can be improved. Because consumers can affect on-farm welfare through their purchasing habits assessing the degree of agreement between consumers and animal welfare specialists is important.

KW - Consumer perceptions

KW - Free-range

KW - Laying hens

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979201649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-02-2016-0065

U2 - 10.1108/BFJ-02-2016-0065

DO - 10.1108/BFJ-02-2016-0065

M3 - Article

VL - 118

SP - 1999

EP - 2013

JO - British Food Journal

JF - British Food Journal

SN - 0007-070X

IS - 8

ER -