Consumer motivations for mainstream “ethical” consumption

Iain Andrew Davies, Sabrina Gutsche

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 8 Citations

Abstract

Purpose: By looking at the motivation behind mainstream ethical consumption this paper explores why consumers absorb ethical habits into their daily consumption, despite having little interest or understanding of the ethics they are buying into.

Design/methodology/approach: 50 in-depth field interviews at point of purchase capture actual ethical consumption behaviour, tied with a progressive laddering interview technique yields over 400 consumption units of analysis.

Findings: Ethical attitudes, values, and rational information processing have limited veracity for mainstream ethical consumption. Habit and constrained choice, as well as self-gratification, peer influence and an interpretivist understanding of what ethics are being purchased provide the primary drivers for consumption.

Research limitations/implications: Use of qualitative sampling and analysis limits the generalizability of this paper. However the quantitative representation of data demonstrates the strength with which motivations were perceived to influence consumption choice.

Practical implications: Ethical brands which focus on explicit altruistic ethical messaging at the expense of hedonic messaging, or ambiguous pseudo ethics-as-quality messaging, limit their appeal to mainstream consumers. Retailers however benefit from the halo effect of ethical brands in store.

Social implications: The paper highlights the importance of retailer engagement with ethical products as a precursor to normalizing ethical consumption, and the importance of normative messaging in changing habits.

Originality/value: Provides original robust critique of the current field of ethical consumption and provides insight into new theoretical themes of urgent general interest to the field.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1326-1347
JournalEuropean Journal of Marketing
Volume50
Issue number7/8
DOIs
StatusPublished - Aug 2016

Fingerprint

Ethical consumption
Habit
Retailers
Sampling
Peer influence
Ethical attitudes
Halo effect
Unit of analysis
Purchase
Expenses
Information processing
Design methodology
Consumption behavior
Laddering
Generalizability

Keywords

  • Sustainability
  • Moral Consumption
  • Ethical Consumption
  • Sustainable Consumption
  • Fair trade

Cite this

Consumer motivations for mainstream “ethical” consumption. / Davies, Iain Andrew; Gutsche, Sabrina.

In: European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 50, No. 7/8, 08.2016, p. 1326-1347.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{26387cd6c3ad4aa087c1ea2c0e7debe2,
title = "Consumer motivations for mainstream “ethical” consumption",
abstract = "Purpose: By looking at the motivation behind mainstream ethical consumption this paper explores why consumers absorb ethical habits into their daily consumption, despite having little interest or understanding of the ethics they are buying into. Design/methodology/approach: 50 in-depth field interviews at point of purchase capture actual ethical consumption behaviour, tied with a progressive laddering interview technique yields over 400 consumption units of analysis. Findings: Ethical attitudes, values, and rational information processing have limited veracity for mainstream ethical consumption. Habit and constrained choice, as well as self-gratification, peer influence and an interpretivist understanding of what ethics are being purchased provide the primary drivers for consumption. Research limitations/implications: Use of qualitative sampling and analysis limits the generalizability of this paper. However the quantitative representation of data demonstrates the strength with which motivations were perceived to influence consumption choice. Practical implications: Ethical brands which focus on explicit altruistic ethical messaging at the expense of hedonic messaging, or ambiguous pseudo ethics-as-quality messaging, limit their appeal to mainstream consumers. Retailers however benefit from the halo effect of ethical brands in store. Social implications: The paper highlights the importance of retailer engagement with ethical products as a precursor to normalizing ethical consumption, and the importance of normative messaging in changing habits.Originality/value: Provides original robust critique of the current field of ethical consumption and provides insight into new theoretical themes of urgent general interest to the field.",
keywords = "Sustainability, Moral Consumption, Ethical Consumption, Sustainable Consumption, Fair trade",
author = "Davies, {Iain Andrew} and Sabrina Gutsche",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1108/EJM-11-2015-0795",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "1326--1347",
journal = "European Journal of Marketing",
issn = "0309-0566",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "7/8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consumer motivations for mainstream “ethical” consumption

AU - Davies,Iain Andrew

AU - Gutsche,Sabrina

PY - 2016/8

Y1 - 2016/8

N2 - Purpose: By looking at the motivation behind mainstream ethical consumption this paper explores why consumers absorb ethical habits into their daily consumption, despite having little interest or understanding of the ethics they are buying into. Design/methodology/approach: 50 in-depth field interviews at point of purchase capture actual ethical consumption behaviour, tied with a progressive laddering interview technique yields over 400 consumption units of analysis. Findings: Ethical attitudes, values, and rational information processing have limited veracity for mainstream ethical consumption. Habit and constrained choice, as well as self-gratification, peer influence and an interpretivist understanding of what ethics are being purchased provide the primary drivers for consumption. Research limitations/implications: Use of qualitative sampling and analysis limits the generalizability of this paper. However the quantitative representation of data demonstrates the strength with which motivations were perceived to influence consumption choice. Practical implications: Ethical brands which focus on explicit altruistic ethical messaging at the expense of hedonic messaging, or ambiguous pseudo ethics-as-quality messaging, limit their appeal to mainstream consumers. Retailers however benefit from the halo effect of ethical brands in store. Social implications: The paper highlights the importance of retailer engagement with ethical products as a precursor to normalizing ethical consumption, and the importance of normative messaging in changing habits.Originality/value: Provides original robust critique of the current field of ethical consumption and provides insight into new theoretical themes of urgent general interest to the field.

AB - Purpose: By looking at the motivation behind mainstream ethical consumption this paper explores why consumers absorb ethical habits into their daily consumption, despite having little interest or understanding of the ethics they are buying into. Design/methodology/approach: 50 in-depth field interviews at point of purchase capture actual ethical consumption behaviour, tied with a progressive laddering interview technique yields over 400 consumption units of analysis. Findings: Ethical attitudes, values, and rational information processing have limited veracity for mainstream ethical consumption. Habit and constrained choice, as well as self-gratification, peer influence and an interpretivist understanding of what ethics are being purchased provide the primary drivers for consumption. Research limitations/implications: Use of qualitative sampling and analysis limits the generalizability of this paper. However the quantitative representation of data demonstrates the strength with which motivations were perceived to influence consumption choice. Practical implications: Ethical brands which focus on explicit altruistic ethical messaging at the expense of hedonic messaging, or ambiguous pseudo ethics-as-quality messaging, limit their appeal to mainstream consumers. Retailers however benefit from the halo effect of ethical brands in store. Social implications: The paper highlights the importance of retailer engagement with ethical products as a precursor to normalizing ethical consumption, and the importance of normative messaging in changing habits.Originality/value: Provides original robust critique of the current field of ethical consumption and provides insight into new theoretical themes of urgent general interest to the field.

KW - Sustainability

KW - Moral Consumption

KW - Ethical Consumption

KW - Sustainable Consumption

KW - Fair trade

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EJM-11-2015-0795

U2 - 10.1108/EJM-11-2015-0795

DO - 10.1108/EJM-11-2015-0795

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 1326

EP - 1347

JO - European Journal of Marketing

T2 - European Journal of Marketing

JF - European Journal of Marketing

SN - 0309-0566

IS - 7/8

ER -