Considering connectivity in operations journals

Niall Piercy, Nigel Caldwell, Nick Rich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the coverage of identified topics that represent three key themes of change in management practice. These themes, focused on the new interconnected modern business operation, consist of: cross-functional or process-based working, supply networks, and systems thinking. The paper seeks to examine the coverage of these themes in operations journals as a proxy to determine how well the academic operations community is adapting to the interconnected business world.
Design/methodology/approach – Two separate lists compiled to rank the quality of operations journals (one based in the UK, the other in the USA) are used to structure a search for keywords representing the identified connectivity themes in the identified “top” leading operations journals to determine how well the different topics are covered. The term “operations” is intended to refer to the related specialities of both operations management and operations research.
Findings – Findings indicate overall very weak coverage of the three connectivity topics. Systems thinking was best represented. However, this representation was not in operations management journals but predominantly operations research sources. Both supply network and cross-functional working were poorly represented as topics more generally. The implication of the findings is that the operations literature has yet to embrace key issues of connectivity and greater attention should therefore be paid to these areas to better inform business practice.
Originality/value – To the best of one's knowledge no such study of this type or breadth has been previously conducted.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)607-631
Number of pages25
JournalInternational Journal of Productivity and Performance Management
Volume58
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Connectivity
Operations management
Operations research
Systems thinking
Supply network
Management research
Key words
Management practices
Design methodology
Business practices

Cite this

Considering connectivity in operations journals. / Piercy, Niall; Caldwell, Nigel; Rich, Nick.

In: International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 58, No. 7, 2009, p. 607-631.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Piercy, Niall ; Caldwell, Nigel ; Rich, Nick. / Considering connectivity in operations journals. In: International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 2009 ; Vol. 58, No. 7. pp. 607-631.
@article{669d9e651f3f42159e881d39f7330e83,
title = "Considering connectivity in operations journals",
abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the coverage of identified topics that represent three key themes of change in management practice. These themes, focused on the new interconnected modern business operation, consist of: cross-functional or process-based working, supply networks, and systems thinking. The paper seeks to examine the coverage of these themes in operations journals as a proxy to determine how well the academic operations community is adapting to the interconnected business world. Design/methodology/approach – Two separate lists compiled to rank the quality of operations journals (one based in the UK, the other in the USA) are used to structure a search for keywords representing the identified connectivity themes in the identified “top” leading operations journals to determine how well the different topics are covered. The term “operations” is intended to refer to the related specialities of both operations management and operations research. Findings – Findings indicate overall very weak coverage of the three connectivity topics. Systems thinking was best represented. However, this representation was not in operations management journals but predominantly operations research sources. Both supply network and cross-functional working were poorly represented as topics more generally. The implication of the findings is that the operations literature has yet to embrace key issues of connectivity and greater attention should therefore be paid to these areas to better inform business practice. Originality/value – To the best of one's knowledge no such study of this type or breadth has been previously conducted.",
author = "Niall Piercy and Nigel Caldwell and Nick Rich",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1108/17410400910989449",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "607--631",
journal = "International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management",
issn = "1741-0401",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Considering connectivity in operations journals

AU - Piercy, Niall

AU - Caldwell, Nigel

AU - Rich, Nick

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the coverage of identified topics that represent three key themes of change in management practice. These themes, focused on the new interconnected modern business operation, consist of: cross-functional or process-based working, supply networks, and systems thinking. The paper seeks to examine the coverage of these themes in operations journals as a proxy to determine how well the academic operations community is adapting to the interconnected business world. Design/methodology/approach – Two separate lists compiled to rank the quality of operations journals (one based in the UK, the other in the USA) are used to structure a search for keywords representing the identified connectivity themes in the identified “top” leading operations journals to determine how well the different topics are covered. The term “operations” is intended to refer to the related specialities of both operations management and operations research. Findings – Findings indicate overall very weak coverage of the three connectivity topics. Systems thinking was best represented. However, this representation was not in operations management journals but predominantly operations research sources. Both supply network and cross-functional working were poorly represented as topics more generally. The implication of the findings is that the operations literature has yet to embrace key issues of connectivity and greater attention should therefore be paid to these areas to better inform business practice. Originality/value – To the best of one's knowledge no such study of this type or breadth has been previously conducted.

AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the coverage of identified topics that represent three key themes of change in management practice. These themes, focused on the new interconnected modern business operation, consist of: cross-functional or process-based working, supply networks, and systems thinking. The paper seeks to examine the coverage of these themes in operations journals as a proxy to determine how well the academic operations community is adapting to the interconnected business world. Design/methodology/approach – Two separate lists compiled to rank the quality of operations journals (one based in the UK, the other in the USA) are used to structure a search for keywords representing the identified connectivity themes in the identified “top” leading operations journals to determine how well the different topics are covered. The term “operations” is intended to refer to the related specialities of both operations management and operations research. Findings – Findings indicate overall very weak coverage of the three connectivity topics. Systems thinking was best represented. However, this representation was not in operations management journals but predominantly operations research sources. Both supply network and cross-functional working were poorly represented as topics more generally. The implication of the findings is that the operations literature has yet to embrace key issues of connectivity and greater attention should therefore be paid to these areas to better inform business practice. Originality/value – To the best of one's knowledge no such study of this type or breadth has been previously conducted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350763825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410400910989449

U2 - 10.1108/17410400910989449

DO - 10.1108/17410400910989449

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 607

EP - 631

JO - International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management

JF - International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management

SN - 1741-0401

IS - 7

ER -