Considerations that affect optimised simulation in a running jump for height

Cassie Wilson, M Yeadon, M King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study used a computer simulation model to investigate various considerations that affect optimum peak height in a running jump. A planar eight-segment computer simulation model with extensor and flexor torque generators at five joints was formulated and customised to an elite male high jumper. A simulation was matched to a recorded high jumping performance by varying the activation profiles of each of the torque generators giving a simulated peak height of 1.99 m compared to the recorded performance of 2.01 m. In order to maximise the peak height reached by the mass centre in the flight phase, the activation profiles were varied, keeping the same initial conditions as in the matching simulation. Optimisations were carried out without any constraints, with constraints on the angular momentum at take-off, with further constraints on joint angles, and with additional requirements of robustness to perturbations of activation timings. A peak height of 2.37 m was achieved in the optimisation without constraints. Introducing the three constraints in turn resulted in peak heights of 2.21, 2.14 and 1.99 m. With all three types of constraints included, the peak height was similar to that achieved in the recorded performance. It is concluded that such considerations have a substantial influence on optimum technique and must be included in studies using optimised simulations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3155-3161
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Biomechanics
Volume40
Issue number14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Computer Simulation
Chemical activation
Torque
Joints
Angular momentum
Computer simulation
Takeoff

Cite this

Considerations that affect optimised simulation in a running jump for height. / Wilson, Cassie; Yeadon, M; King, M.

In: Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 40, No. 14, 2007, p. 3155-3161.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f5bd7da77179490692d61a692882c7f3,
title = "Considerations that affect optimised simulation in a running jump for height",
abstract = "This study used a computer simulation model to investigate various considerations that affect optimum peak height in a running jump. A planar eight-segment computer simulation model with extensor and flexor torque generators at five joints was formulated and customised to an elite male high jumper. A simulation was matched to a recorded high jumping performance by varying the activation profiles of each of the torque generators giving a simulated peak height of 1.99 m compared to the recorded performance of 2.01 m. In order to maximise the peak height reached by the mass centre in the flight phase, the activation profiles were varied, keeping the same initial conditions as in the matching simulation. Optimisations were carried out without any constraints, with constraints on the angular momentum at take-off, with further constraints on joint angles, and with additional requirements of robustness to perturbations of activation timings. A peak height of 2.37 m was achieved in the optimisation without constraints. Introducing the three constraints in turn resulted in peak heights of 2.21, 2.14 and 1.99 m. With all three types of constraints included, the peak height was similar to that achieved in the recorded performance. It is concluded that such considerations have a substantial influence on optimum technique and must be included in studies using optimised simulations.",
author = "Cassie Wilson and M Yeadon and M King",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.03.030",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "3155--3161",
journal = "Journal of Biomechanics",
issn = "0021-9290",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Considerations that affect optimised simulation in a running jump for height

AU - Wilson, Cassie

AU - Yeadon, M

AU - King, M

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This study used a computer simulation model to investigate various considerations that affect optimum peak height in a running jump. A planar eight-segment computer simulation model with extensor and flexor torque generators at five joints was formulated and customised to an elite male high jumper. A simulation was matched to a recorded high jumping performance by varying the activation profiles of each of the torque generators giving a simulated peak height of 1.99 m compared to the recorded performance of 2.01 m. In order to maximise the peak height reached by the mass centre in the flight phase, the activation profiles were varied, keeping the same initial conditions as in the matching simulation. Optimisations were carried out without any constraints, with constraints on the angular momentum at take-off, with further constraints on joint angles, and with additional requirements of robustness to perturbations of activation timings. A peak height of 2.37 m was achieved in the optimisation without constraints. Introducing the three constraints in turn resulted in peak heights of 2.21, 2.14 and 1.99 m. With all three types of constraints included, the peak height was similar to that achieved in the recorded performance. It is concluded that such considerations have a substantial influence on optimum technique and must be included in studies using optimised simulations.

AB - This study used a computer simulation model to investigate various considerations that affect optimum peak height in a running jump. A planar eight-segment computer simulation model with extensor and flexor torque generators at five joints was formulated and customised to an elite male high jumper. A simulation was matched to a recorded high jumping performance by varying the activation profiles of each of the torque generators giving a simulated peak height of 1.99 m compared to the recorded performance of 2.01 m. In order to maximise the peak height reached by the mass centre in the flight phase, the activation profiles were varied, keeping the same initial conditions as in the matching simulation. Optimisations were carried out without any constraints, with constraints on the angular momentum at take-off, with further constraints on joint angles, and with additional requirements of robustness to perturbations of activation timings. A peak height of 2.37 m was achieved in the optimisation without constraints. Introducing the three constraints in turn resulted in peak heights of 2.21, 2.14 and 1.99 m. With all three types of constraints included, the peak height was similar to that achieved in the recorded performance. It is concluded that such considerations have a substantial influence on optimum technique and must be included in studies using optimised simulations.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.03.030

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.03.030

DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.03.030

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 3155

EP - 3161

JO - Journal of Biomechanics

JF - Journal of Biomechanics

SN - 0021-9290

IS - 14

ER -