TY - JOUR
T1 - Consensus on a video analysis framework of descriptors and definitions by the Rugby Union Video Analysis Consensus group
AU - Hendricks, Sharief
AU - Till, Kevin
AU - den Hollander, Steve
AU - Savage, Trevor
AU - Roberts, Simon
AU - Tierney, Gregory
AU - Burger, Nicholas
AU - Kerr, Hamish
AU - Kemp, Simon
AU - Cross, Matthew
AU - Patricios, Jon
AU - McKune, Andrew
AU - Bennett, Mark
AU - Rock, Andrew
AU - Stokes, Keith
AU - Ross, Alex
AU - Readhead, Clint
AU - Quarrie, Ken
AU - Tucker, Ross
AU - Jones, Ben
PY - 2020/5/4
Y1 - 2020/5/4
N2 - Using an expert consensus-based approach, a rugby union Video Analysis Consensus (RUVAC) group was formed to develop a framework for video analysis research in rugby union. The aim of the framework is to improve the consistency of video analysis work in rugby union and help enhance the overall quality of future research in the sport. To reach consensus, a systematic review and Delphi method study design was used. After a systematic search of the literature, 17 articles were used to develop the final framework that described and defined key actions and events in rugby union (rugby). Thereafter, a group of researchers and practitioners with experience and expertise in rugby video analysis formed the RUVAC group. Each member of the group examined the framework of descriptors and definitions and rated their level of agreement on a 5-point agreement Likert scale (1: strongly disagree; 2: disagree; 3: n either agree or disagree; 4: agree; 5: strongly agree). The mean rating of agreement on the five-point scale (1: strongly disagree; 5: strongly agree) was 4.6 (4.3-4.9), 4.6 (4.4-4.9), 4.7 (4.5-4.9), 4.8 (4.6-5.0) and 4.8 (4.6-5.0) for the tackle, ruck, scrum, line-out and maul, respectively. The RUVAC group recommends using this consensus as the starting framework when conducting rugby video analysis research. Which variables to use (if not all) depends on the objectives of the study. Furthermore, the intention of this consensus is to help integrate video data with other data (eg, injury surveillance).
AB - Using an expert consensus-based approach, a rugby union Video Analysis Consensus (RUVAC) group was formed to develop a framework for video analysis research in rugby union. The aim of the framework is to improve the consistency of video analysis work in rugby union and help enhance the overall quality of future research in the sport. To reach consensus, a systematic review and Delphi method study design was used. After a systematic search of the literature, 17 articles were used to develop the final framework that described and defined key actions and events in rugby union (rugby). Thereafter, a group of researchers and practitioners with experience and expertise in rugby video analysis formed the RUVAC group. Each member of the group examined the framework of descriptors and definitions and rated their level of agreement on a 5-point agreement Likert scale (1: strongly disagree; 2: disagree; 3: n either agree or disagree; 4: agree; 5: strongly agree). The mean rating of agreement on the five-point scale (1: strongly disagree; 5: strongly agree) was 4.6 (4.3-4.9), 4.6 (4.4-4.9), 4.7 (4.5-4.9), 4.8 (4.6-5.0) and 4.8 (4.6-5.0) for the tackle, ruck, scrum, line-out and maul, respectively. The RUVAC group recommends using this consensus as the starting framework when conducting rugby video analysis research. Which variables to use (if not all) depends on the objectives of the study. Furthermore, the intention of this consensus is to help integrate video data with other data (eg, injury surveillance).
KW - Rugby
KW - consensus
KW - contact sports
KW - injury prevention
KW - performance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85080896754&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101293
DO - 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101293
M3 - Article
SN - 0306-3674
VL - 54
SP - 566
EP - 572
JO - British Journal of Sports Medicine
JF - British Journal of Sports Medicine
ER -