Abstract
Five hundred adults indicated their preferences about the fairness and ethics of allocating scarce medical interventions. They also completed an IQ test, a measure of self-esteem and the extent to which they believed in a Just World, as well as General Conspiracy Theories. Results confirmed previous studies which showed a strong preference for the Utilitarian “saves most lives,” followed by the Prioritization “sickest first” and “youngest first,” preferences. Correlations and regressions indicated relatively few significant individual difference correlates of allocation preferences, with IQ being the major exception. Implications and limitations are discussed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 568-578 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Ethics and Behavior |
Volume | 33 |
Issue number | 7 |
Early online date | 29 Aug 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 31 Dec 2023 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- allocation
- covid-19
- medical ethics
- Scare resources
- utilitarianism
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- General Psychology