Conflict-Fragility-Education

Issues in Conceptualization and Measurement

Julia Paulson, Robin Shields

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION In recent years, the concept of state fragility has become increasingly pertinent to discussion of conflict and education. The Inter-Agency Network for Education in Emergencies (INEE), for instance, created a Working Group on Education and Fragility in 2008, which brings together donors, policymakers and academics to ‘catalyze collaborative action on issues relating to education and fragility’ (INEE, 2014). Working Group research and mapping exercises (e.g. SmiThellison, 2013; Davies, 2011; Barakat et al., 2008) and academic publications (e.g. Mosselson et al., 2009; Kirk, 2007) have contributed towards a growing body of literature on education and fragility. However, consideration of state fragility in research on conflict and education introduced a new level of intricacy into what is already a highly complex set of relationships. Research around the ‘two faces’ of education in conflict has already highlighted the multi-directionality of the relationship(s) between education and conflict (e.g. Davies, 2010; Paulson, 2008); fragility introduces further uncertainty around the causes, effects and interconnections of the outbreak of violent conflict, poor educational performance and instability. This complexity is heightened when seeking to explore these multiple relationships empirically as the definition and measurement of concepts like fragility are notoriously difficult (Mata and Ziaja, 2009).

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Contested Role of Education in Conflict and Fragility
PublisherSense Publishers
Pages45-62
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)978-94-6300-010-9
ISBN (Print)978-94-6300-008-6, 978-94-6300-009-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Paulson, J., & Shields, R. (2015). Conflict-Fragility-Education: Issues in Conceptualization and Measurement. In The Contested Role of Education in Conflict and Fragility (pp. 45-62). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-010-9_2

Conflict-Fragility-Education : Issues in Conceptualization and Measurement. / Paulson, Julia; Shields, Robin.

The Contested Role of Education in Conflict and Fragility. Sense Publishers, 2015. p. 45-62.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Paulson, J & Shields, R 2015, Conflict-Fragility-Education: Issues in Conceptualization and Measurement. in The Contested Role of Education in Conflict and Fragility. Sense Publishers, pp. 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-010-9_2
Paulson J, Shields R. Conflict-Fragility-Education: Issues in Conceptualization and Measurement. In The Contested Role of Education in Conflict and Fragility. Sense Publishers. 2015. p. 45-62 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-010-9_2
Paulson, Julia ; Shields, Robin. / Conflict-Fragility-Education : Issues in Conceptualization and Measurement. The Contested Role of Education in Conflict and Fragility. Sense Publishers, 2015. pp. 45-62
@inbook{b6653ef7e23b4a39b87dc609de5fb6c7,
title = "Conflict-Fragility-Education: Issues in Conceptualization and Measurement",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION In recent years, the concept of state fragility has become increasingly pertinent to discussion of conflict and education. The Inter-Agency Network for Education in Emergencies (INEE), for instance, created a Working Group on Education and Fragility in 2008, which brings together donors, policymakers and academics to ‘catalyze collaborative action on issues relating to education and fragility’ (INEE, 2014). Working Group research and mapping exercises (e.g. SmiThellison, 2013; Davies, 2011; Barakat et al., 2008) and academic publications (e.g. Mosselson et al., 2009; Kirk, 2007) have contributed towards a growing body of literature on education and fragility. However, consideration of state fragility in research on conflict and education introduced a new level of intricacy into what is already a highly complex set of relationships. Research around the ‘two faces’ of education in conflict has already highlighted the multi-directionality of the relationship(s) between education and conflict (e.g. Davies, 2010; Paulson, 2008); fragility introduces further uncertainty around the causes, effects and interconnections of the outbreak of violent conflict, poor educational performance and instability. This complexity is heightened when seeking to explore these multiple relationships empirically as the definition and measurement of concepts like fragility are notoriously difficult (Mata and Ziaja, 2009).",
author = "Julia Paulson and Robin Shields",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-94-6300-010-9_2",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-94-6300-008-6",
pages = "45--62",
booktitle = "The Contested Role of Education in Conflict and Fragility",
publisher = "Sense Publishers",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Conflict-Fragility-Education

T2 - Issues in Conceptualization and Measurement

AU - Paulson, Julia

AU - Shields, Robin

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - INTRODUCTION In recent years, the concept of state fragility has become increasingly pertinent to discussion of conflict and education. The Inter-Agency Network for Education in Emergencies (INEE), for instance, created a Working Group on Education and Fragility in 2008, which brings together donors, policymakers and academics to ‘catalyze collaborative action on issues relating to education and fragility’ (INEE, 2014). Working Group research and mapping exercises (e.g. SmiThellison, 2013; Davies, 2011; Barakat et al., 2008) and academic publications (e.g. Mosselson et al., 2009; Kirk, 2007) have contributed towards a growing body of literature on education and fragility. However, consideration of state fragility in research on conflict and education introduced a new level of intricacy into what is already a highly complex set of relationships. Research around the ‘two faces’ of education in conflict has already highlighted the multi-directionality of the relationship(s) between education and conflict (e.g. Davies, 2010; Paulson, 2008); fragility introduces further uncertainty around the causes, effects and interconnections of the outbreak of violent conflict, poor educational performance and instability. This complexity is heightened when seeking to explore these multiple relationships empirically as the definition and measurement of concepts like fragility are notoriously difficult (Mata and Ziaja, 2009).

AB - INTRODUCTION In recent years, the concept of state fragility has become increasingly pertinent to discussion of conflict and education. The Inter-Agency Network for Education in Emergencies (INEE), for instance, created a Working Group on Education and Fragility in 2008, which brings together donors, policymakers and academics to ‘catalyze collaborative action on issues relating to education and fragility’ (INEE, 2014). Working Group research and mapping exercises (e.g. SmiThellison, 2013; Davies, 2011; Barakat et al., 2008) and academic publications (e.g. Mosselson et al., 2009; Kirk, 2007) have contributed towards a growing body of literature on education and fragility. However, consideration of state fragility in research on conflict and education introduced a new level of intricacy into what is already a highly complex set of relationships. Research around the ‘two faces’ of education in conflict has already highlighted the multi-directionality of the relationship(s) between education and conflict (e.g. Davies, 2010; Paulson, 2008); fragility introduces further uncertainty around the causes, effects and interconnections of the outbreak of violent conflict, poor educational performance and instability. This complexity is heightened when seeking to explore these multiple relationships empirically as the definition and measurement of concepts like fragility are notoriously difficult (Mata and Ziaja, 2009).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943400142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-94-6300-010-9_2

DO - 10.1007/978-94-6300-010-9_2

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-94-6300-008-6

SN - 978-94-6300-009-3

SP - 45

EP - 62

BT - The Contested Role of Education in Conflict and Fragility

PB - Sense Publishers

ER -