Concordant preferences for opposite-sex signals? Human pheromones and facial characteristics

R. Elisabeth Cornwell, Lynda Boothroyd, D. Michael Burt, David R. Feinberg, Ben C. Jones, Anthony C. Little, Robert Pitman, Susie Whiten, David I. Perrett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

90 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

We have investigated whether preferences for masculine and feminine characteristics are correlated across two modalities, olfaction and vision. In study 1, subjects rated the pleasantness of putative male (4,16-androstadien-3- one; 5α-androst-16-en-3-one) and female (1,3,5(10),16-estratetraen-3-ol) pheromones, and chose the most attractive face shape from a masculine-feminine continuum for a long- and a short-term relationship. Study 2 replicated study 1 and further explored the effects of relationship context on pheromone ratings. For long-term relationships, women's preferences for masculine face shapes correlated with ratings of 4,16-androstadien-3-one and men's preferences for feminine face shapes correlated with ratings of 1,3,5(10),16-estratetraen-3-ol. These studies link sex-specific preferences for putative human sex pheromones and sexually dimorphic facial characteristics. Our findings suggest that putative sex pheromones and sexually dimorphic facial characteristics convey common information about the quality of potential mates.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)635-640
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volume271
Issue number1539
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Mar 2004

Keywords

  • Facial attraction
  • Male-female differences
  • Mating strategies
  • Pheromones

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Concordant preferences for opposite-sex signals? Human pheromones and facial characteristics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this