Conceptualizing and measuring ethnicity

Graham K. Brown, Arnim Langer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper critically reviews the ontological debates over the nature of ethnicity and the different ways in which it is operationalized and “measured” for quantitative research. It is argued that while moving away from a “primordealist” position on ethnicity renders measurement of the social diversity more difficult, conceptually and practically it does not invalidate this exercise. A second problem, however, is also identified with the measurement of ethnicity: when information on ethnic diversity is incorporated with other socio-economic information, a range of measures can be derived that purport to pick up very different distributions, but that are in reality often very highly correlated. These two problems combined present a significant challenge for the quantitative study of the relationship between ethnic diversity and political and economic outcomes such as conflict and growth patterns. The authors do not assert that these problems invalidate the exercise of investigating these relationships econometrically entirely, but they suggest the problems do warn us to be more guarded and modest in the claims made on the basis of such analyses.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)411-436
Number of pages26
JournalOxford Development Studies
Volume38
Issue number4
Early online date25 Nov 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2010

Fingerprint

ethnicity
information economics
quantitative research
economics
measuring

Cite this

Conceptualizing and measuring ethnicity. / Brown, Graham K.; Langer, Arnim.

In: Oxford Development Studies, Vol. 38, No. 4, 12.2010, p. 411-436.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brown, Graham K. ; Langer, Arnim. / Conceptualizing and measuring ethnicity. In: Oxford Development Studies. 2010 ; Vol. 38, No. 4. pp. 411-436.
@article{f440deeaf96848efb968a3edeb2039f8,
title = "Conceptualizing and measuring ethnicity",
abstract = "This paper critically reviews the ontological debates over the nature of ethnicity and the different ways in which it is operationalized and “measured” for quantitative research. It is argued that while moving away from a “primordealist” position on ethnicity renders measurement of the social diversity more difficult, conceptually and practically it does not invalidate this exercise. A second problem, however, is also identified with the measurement of ethnicity: when information on ethnic diversity is incorporated with other socio-economic information, a range of measures can be derived that purport to pick up very different distributions, but that are in reality often very highly correlated. These two problems combined present a significant challenge for the quantitative study of the relationship between ethnic diversity and political and economic outcomes such as conflict and growth patterns. The authors do not assert that these problems invalidate the exercise of investigating these relationships econometrically entirely, but they suggest the problems do warn us to be more guarded and modest in the claims made on the basis of such analyses.",
author = "Brown, {Graham K.} and Arnim Langer",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1080/13600818.2010.525629",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "411--436",
journal = "Oxford Development Studies",
issn = "1360-0818",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conceptualizing and measuring ethnicity

AU - Brown, Graham K.

AU - Langer, Arnim

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - This paper critically reviews the ontological debates over the nature of ethnicity and the different ways in which it is operationalized and “measured” for quantitative research. It is argued that while moving away from a “primordealist” position on ethnicity renders measurement of the social diversity more difficult, conceptually and practically it does not invalidate this exercise. A second problem, however, is also identified with the measurement of ethnicity: when information on ethnic diversity is incorporated with other socio-economic information, a range of measures can be derived that purport to pick up very different distributions, but that are in reality often very highly correlated. These two problems combined present a significant challenge for the quantitative study of the relationship between ethnic diversity and political and economic outcomes such as conflict and growth patterns. The authors do not assert that these problems invalidate the exercise of investigating these relationships econometrically entirely, but they suggest the problems do warn us to be more guarded and modest in the claims made on the basis of such analyses.

AB - This paper critically reviews the ontological debates over the nature of ethnicity and the different ways in which it is operationalized and “measured” for quantitative research. It is argued that while moving away from a “primordealist” position on ethnicity renders measurement of the social diversity more difficult, conceptually and practically it does not invalidate this exercise. A second problem, however, is also identified with the measurement of ethnicity: when information on ethnic diversity is incorporated with other socio-economic information, a range of measures can be derived that purport to pick up very different distributions, but that are in reality often very highly correlated. These two problems combined present a significant challenge for the quantitative study of the relationship between ethnic diversity and political and economic outcomes such as conflict and growth patterns. The authors do not assert that these problems invalidate the exercise of investigating these relationships econometrically entirely, but they suggest the problems do warn us to be more guarded and modest in the claims made on the basis of such analyses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649704930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2010.525629

U2 - 10.1080/13600818.2010.525629

DO - 10.1080/13600818.2010.525629

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 411

EP - 436

JO - Oxford Development Studies

JF - Oxford Development Studies

SN - 1360-0818

IS - 4

ER -