Conceptual beliefs about human values and their implications: Human nature beliefs predict value importance, value trade-offs, and responses to value-laden rhetoric

Paul G. Bain, Yoshihisa Kashima, Nick Haslam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Beliefs that may underlie the importance of human values were investigated in 4 studies, drawing on research that distinguishes natural-kind (natural), nominal-kind (conventional), and artifact (functional) beliefs. Values were best characterized by artifact and nominal-kind beliefs, as well as a natural-kind belief specific to the social domain, "human nature" (Studies 1 and 2). The extent to which values were considered central to human nature was associated with value importance in both Australia and Japan (Study 2), and experimentally manipulating human nature beliefs influenced value importance (Study 3). Beyond their association with importance, human nature beliefs predicted participants' reactions to value trade-offs (Study 1) and to value-laden rhetorical statements (Study 4). Human nature beliefs therefore play a central role in the psychology of values.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)351-367
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume91
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2006

Keywords

  • Human nature
  • Human values
  • Natural kinds
  • Rhetoric
  • Trade-offs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Conceptual beliefs about human values and their implications: Human nature beliefs predict value importance, value trade-offs, and responses to value-laden rhetoric'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this