Computer assisted animation: 2D or not 2D?

J W Patterson, P Willis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

2D animation can only be automated to the extent that the computer acts as an interactive assistant to the animator. The key problem is that the 3D information which is implicit in the animated drawings is unavailable and this has encouraged the view of 2D animation being a subset of 3D animation in its fullest generality. However, introducing more than the absolute minimum of 3D information, essentially that contained in a hierarchy of drawing overlays, has matching advantages and disadvantages because animators, for aesthetic reasons, deliberately break the rules of geometry and physics as they apply to real-world objects. A software environment which only supports 2D functionality and drawing overlays is sufficient to promote cost-effectively the full range of effects that animators use while the state of the 3D animation art is as yet incapable of this. Essentially the same techniques can be used on live-capture images once they have had a structure similar to that required for animation imposed on them.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)829-839
Number of pages11
JournalThe Computer Journal
Volume37
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1994

Fingerprint

Drawing (graphics)
Animation
Physics
Geometry
Costs

Cite this

Computer assisted animation: 2D or not 2D? / Patterson, J W; Willis, P.

In: The Computer Journal, Vol. 37, No. 10, 1994, p. 829-839.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Patterson, JW & Willis, P 1994, 'Computer assisted animation: 2D or not 2D?', The Computer Journal, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 829-839. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/37.10.829
Patterson, J W ; Willis, P. / Computer assisted animation: 2D or not 2D?. In: The Computer Journal. 1994 ; Vol. 37, No. 10. pp. 829-839.
@article{fa2e0986f8094a0eb7996c6d7c55043a,
title = "Computer assisted animation: 2D or not 2D?",
abstract = "2D animation can only be automated to the extent that the computer acts as an interactive assistant to the animator. The key problem is that the 3D information which is implicit in the animated drawings is unavailable and this has encouraged the view of 2D animation being a subset of 3D animation in its fullest generality. However, introducing more than the absolute minimum of 3D information, essentially that contained in a hierarchy of drawing overlays, has matching advantages and disadvantages because animators, for aesthetic reasons, deliberately break the rules of geometry and physics as they apply to real-world objects. A software environment which only supports 2D functionality and drawing overlays is sufficient to promote cost-effectively the full range of effects that animators use while the state of the 3D animation art is as yet incapable of this. Essentially the same techniques can be used on live-capture images once they have had a structure similar to that required for animation imposed on them.",
author = "Patterson, {J W} and P Willis",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1093/comjnl/37.10.829",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "829--839",
journal = "The Computer Journal",
issn = "0010-4620",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computer assisted animation: 2D or not 2D?

AU - Patterson, J W

AU - Willis, P

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - 2D animation can only be automated to the extent that the computer acts as an interactive assistant to the animator. The key problem is that the 3D information which is implicit in the animated drawings is unavailable and this has encouraged the view of 2D animation being a subset of 3D animation in its fullest generality. However, introducing more than the absolute minimum of 3D information, essentially that contained in a hierarchy of drawing overlays, has matching advantages and disadvantages because animators, for aesthetic reasons, deliberately break the rules of geometry and physics as they apply to real-world objects. A software environment which only supports 2D functionality and drawing overlays is sufficient to promote cost-effectively the full range of effects that animators use while the state of the 3D animation art is as yet incapable of this. Essentially the same techniques can be used on live-capture images once they have had a structure similar to that required for animation imposed on them.

AB - 2D animation can only be automated to the extent that the computer acts as an interactive assistant to the animator. The key problem is that the 3D information which is implicit in the animated drawings is unavailable and this has encouraged the view of 2D animation being a subset of 3D animation in its fullest generality. However, introducing more than the absolute minimum of 3D information, essentially that contained in a hierarchy of drawing overlays, has matching advantages and disadvantages because animators, for aesthetic reasons, deliberately break the rules of geometry and physics as they apply to real-world objects. A software environment which only supports 2D functionality and drawing overlays is sufficient to promote cost-effectively the full range of effects that animators use while the state of the 3D animation art is as yet incapable of this. Essentially the same techniques can be used on live-capture images once they have had a structure similar to that required for animation imposed on them.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/37.10.829

U2 - 10.1093/comjnl/37.10.829

DO - 10.1093/comjnl/37.10.829

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 829

EP - 839

JO - The Computer Journal

JF - The Computer Journal

SN - 0010-4620

IS - 10

ER -