TY - GEN
T1 - Compensator design for model-in-the-loop testing
AU - Hu, Jiayang
AU - Plummer, Andrew R.
PY - 2016/11/10
Y1 - 2016/11/10
N2 - Model-in-the-Loop (MiL) testing is a method in which the test object is split into a physical part and a simulated part, and these are connected with interfaces to form a combined physical-numerical system. The challenge of generating a MiL test is that, firstly, because of the limited dynamic response of the actuators, the test results may be inaccurate, and secondly, because of the high frequency noise introduced by the sensors to the closed-loop system, it may be difficult to design a compensator for the actuator response, while stabilizing the closed-loop system at the same time. In this paper, a MiL system is designed using a small hydraulic robot arm. The problems with the MiL test without any compensator is shown with experimental results. The effectiveness of a 1st order phase lead compensator and an inverse model compensator are validated in the experiment. For systems which can be approximated by linear timeinvariant models, it is proposed that compensator design is a linear optimization problem balancing emulation error with noise amplification. Thus, a new method of designing the compensator for MiL testing based on H-∞ optimization is presented.
AB - Model-in-the-Loop (MiL) testing is a method in which the test object is split into a physical part and a simulated part, and these are connected with interfaces to form a combined physical-numerical system. The challenge of generating a MiL test is that, firstly, because of the limited dynamic response of the actuators, the test results may be inaccurate, and secondly, because of the high frequency noise introduced by the sensors to the closed-loop system, it may be difficult to design a compensator for the actuator response, while stabilizing the closed-loop system at the same time. In this paper, a MiL system is designed using a small hydraulic robot arm. The problems with the MiL test without any compensator is shown with experimental results. The effectiveness of a 1st order phase lead compensator and an inverse model compensator are validated in the experiment. For systems which can be approximated by linear timeinvariant models, it is proposed that compensator design is a linear optimization problem balancing emulation error with noise amplification. Thus, a new method of designing the compensator for MiL testing based on H-∞ optimization is presented.
KW - Electrohydraulic Motion Control
KW - H Optimization
KW - Hardware-in-the-Loop Testing
KW - Hybrid Testing
KW - Model-in-the-Loop Testing
KW - Substructuring
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85004010227&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/CONTROL.2016.7737633
DO - 10.1109/CONTROL.2016.7737633
M3 - Chapter in a published conference proceeding
AN - SCOPUS:85004010227
T3 - 2016 UKACC International Conference on Control, UKACC Control 2016
BT - 2016 UKACC International Conference on Control, UKACC Control 2016
PB - IEEE
T2 - 11th UKACC United Kingdom Automatic Control Council International Conference on Control, UKACC Control 2016
Y2 - 31 August 2016 through 2 September 2016
ER -