Comparison of methods for measuring pump flow ripple and impedance

Chris Bramley, David Johnston

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

Positive displacement pumps produce flow and pressure ripple due to their pumping mechanism. Two ISO standard methods for measuring pump ripple were compared in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, reliability and practical difficulty. These were the “secondary source” (SS) method (ISO 10767-1: 1996) and the “2 pressures / 2 systems” (2P2S) method (ISO 10767-1: 2015). The 2P2S method has recently replaced the secondary source as the ISO standard for precision testing although the UK has retained the SS method for its BS ISO standard.
The methods produced similar source impedance and flow ripple results. The SS method enabled a wider range of operating conditions to be tested due to the more flexible circuit arrangement but the impedance results were affected by interference between the test pump and secondary source at the pumping harmonic frequencies. It was found that the simpler 2P2S circuit allowed measurements to be taken faster, but measurements were only valid at the pumping harmonic frequencies. Both methods were found to produce repeatable results provided there was no trapped air in the circuit.
Overall, the SS method was considered the stronger technique in terms of repeatability, accuracy, sensitivity and practicality, but it had a more complex data processing and experimental set up. It had more flexibility, which enabled the pump to be tested over the widest range of operating conditions, and the fluid borne noise characteristics of the test pump could be evaluated completely. The authors consider that the 2P2S method could be improved by the inclusion of a third transducer, and that it would be beneficial to retain the SS method as an alternative Standard.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 17 Oct 2017
EventASME/Bath 2017 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control - Sarasota, USA United States
Duration: 16 Oct 201719 Oct 2017

Conference

ConferenceASME/Bath 2017 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control
Abbreviated titleFPMC 2017
CountryUSA United States
CitySarasota
Period16/10/1719/10/17

Fingerprint

Pumps
Networks (circuits)
Transducers
Fluids
Testing
Air

Cite this

Bramley, C., & Johnston, D. (2017). Comparison of methods for measuring pump flow ripple and impedance. Paper presented at ASME/Bath 2017 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control, Sarasota, USA United States.

Comparison of methods for measuring pump flow ripple and impedance. / Bramley, Chris; Johnston, David.

2017. Paper presented at ASME/Bath 2017 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control, Sarasota, USA United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Bramley, C & Johnston, D 2017, 'Comparison of methods for measuring pump flow ripple and impedance' Paper presented at ASME/Bath 2017 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control, Sarasota, USA United States, 16/10/17 - 19/10/17, .
Bramley C, Johnston D. Comparison of methods for measuring pump flow ripple and impedance. 2017. Paper presented at ASME/Bath 2017 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control, Sarasota, USA United States.
Bramley, Chris ; Johnston, David. / Comparison of methods for measuring pump flow ripple and impedance. Paper presented at ASME/Bath 2017 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control, Sarasota, USA United States.
@conference{23c9fd8c52174a379f95eed12017d804,
title = "Comparison of methods for measuring pump flow ripple and impedance",
abstract = "Positive displacement pumps produce flow and pressure ripple due to their pumping mechanism. Two ISO standard methods for measuring pump ripple were compared in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, reliability and practical difficulty. These were the “secondary source” (SS) method (ISO 10767-1: 1996) and the “2 pressures / 2 systems” (2P2S) method (ISO 10767-1: 2015). The 2P2S method has recently replaced the secondary source as the ISO standard for precision testing although the UK has retained the SS method for its BS ISO standard. The methods produced similar source impedance and flow ripple results. The SS method enabled a wider range of operating conditions to be tested due to the more flexible circuit arrangement but the impedance results were affected by interference between the test pump and secondary source at the pumping harmonic frequencies. It was found that the simpler 2P2S circuit allowed measurements to be taken faster, but measurements were only valid at the pumping harmonic frequencies. Both methods were found to produce repeatable results provided there was no trapped air in the circuit. Overall, the SS method was considered the stronger technique in terms of repeatability, accuracy, sensitivity and practicality, but it had a more complex data processing and experimental set up. It had more flexibility, which enabled the pump to be tested over the widest range of operating conditions, and the fluid borne noise characteristics of the test pump could be evaluated completely. The authors consider that the 2P2S method could be improved by the inclusion of a third transducer, and that it would be beneficial to retain the SS method as an alternative Standard.",
author = "Chris Bramley and David Johnston",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "17",
language = "English",
note = "ASME/Bath 2017 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control, FPMC 2017 ; Conference date: 16-10-2017 Through 19-10-2017",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Comparison of methods for measuring pump flow ripple and impedance

AU - Bramley, Chris

AU - Johnston, David

PY - 2017/10/17

Y1 - 2017/10/17

N2 - Positive displacement pumps produce flow and pressure ripple due to their pumping mechanism. Two ISO standard methods for measuring pump ripple were compared in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, reliability and practical difficulty. These were the “secondary source” (SS) method (ISO 10767-1: 1996) and the “2 pressures / 2 systems” (2P2S) method (ISO 10767-1: 2015). The 2P2S method has recently replaced the secondary source as the ISO standard for precision testing although the UK has retained the SS method for its BS ISO standard. The methods produced similar source impedance and flow ripple results. The SS method enabled a wider range of operating conditions to be tested due to the more flexible circuit arrangement but the impedance results were affected by interference between the test pump and secondary source at the pumping harmonic frequencies. It was found that the simpler 2P2S circuit allowed measurements to be taken faster, but measurements were only valid at the pumping harmonic frequencies. Both methods were found to produce repeatable results provided there was no trapped air in the circuit. Overall, the SS method was considered the stronger technique in terms of repeatability, accuracy, sensitivity and practicality, but it had a more complex data processing and experimental set up. It had more flexibility, which enabled the pump to be tested over the widest range of operating conditions, and the fluid borne noise characteristics of the test pump could be evaluated completely. The authors consider that the 2P2S method could be improved by the inclusion of a third transducer, and that it would be beneficial to retain the SS method as an alternative Standard.

AB - Positive displacement pumps produce flow and pressure ripple due to their pumping mechanism. Two ISO standard methods for measuring pump ripple were compared in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, reliability and practical difficulty. These were the “secondary source” (SS) method (ISO 10767-1: 1996) and the “2 pressures / 2 systems” (2P2S) method (ISO 10767-1: 2015). The 2P2S method has recently replaced the secondary source as the ISO standard for precision testing although the UK has retained the SS method for its BS ISO standard. The methods produced similar source impedance and flow ripple results. The SS method enabled a wider range of operating conditions to be tested due to the more flexible circuit arrangement but the impedance results were affected by interference between the test pump and secondary source at the pumping harmonic frequencies. It was found that the simpler 2P2S circuit allowed measurements to be taken faster, but measurements were only valid at the pumping harmonic frequencies. Both methods were found to produce repeatable results provided there was no trapped air in the circuit. Overall, the SS method was considered the stronger technique in terms of repeatability, accuracy, sensitivity and practicality, but it had a more complex data processing and experimental set up. It had more flexibility, which enabled the pump to be tested over the widest range of operating conditions, and the fluid borne noise characteristics of the test pump could be evaluated completely. The authors consider that the 2P2S method could be improved by the inclusion of a third transducer, and that it would be beneficial to retain the SS method as an alternative Standard.

M3 - Paper

ER -