Comparison between steady and unsteady double-entry turbine performance using the quasi-steady assumption

Colin Copeland, Ricardo Martinez-Botas, Martin Seiler

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The experimental performance evaluation of a circumferentially divided, double-entry turbocharger turbine is presented in this paper with the aim of understanding the influence of pulsating flow. By maintaining a constant speed but varying the frequency of the pulses, the influence of frequency was shown to play an important role in the performance of the turbine. A trend of decreasing cycle-averaged efficiency at lower frequencies was measured. One of the principal objectives was to assess the degree to which the unsteady performance differs from the quasi-steady assumption. In order to make the steady-unsteady comparison for a multiple entry turbine, a wide set of steady equal and unequal admission flow conditions were tested. The steady state data was then interpolated as a function of three, non-dimensional parameters in order to allow a point-by-point comparison with the instantaneous unsteady operation. As an average, the quasi-steady assumption generally under-predicted the mass flow and efficiency loss through the turbine, albeit the differences were reduced as the frequency increased. Out-of-phase pulsations produced unsteady operating orbits that corresponded to a significant steady state, partial admission loss, and this was reflected as a drop in the quasi-steady efficiency. However, these differences between quasi-steady in-phase and out-of-phase predictions were not replicated in the measured results, suggesting that the unequal admission loss is not as significant in pulsating flow as it is in steady flow.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationASME Turbo Expo 2009
Subtitle of host publicationPower for Land, Sea, and Air. Volume 7 - Turbomachinery, Parts A and B
PublisherASME
Pages1203-1212
ISBN (Print)9780791848883
DOIs
StatusPublished - 2009
EventASME Turbo Expo 2009 - Orlando, UK United Kingdom
Duration: 8 Jun 200912 Jun 2009

Conference

ConferenceASME Turbo Expo 2009
CountryUK United Kingdom
CityOrlando
Period8/06/0912/06/09

Fingerprint

Turbines
Steady flow
Orbits

Cite this

Copeland, C., Martinez-Botas, R., & Seiler, M. (2009). Comparison between steady and unsteady double-entry turbine performance using the quasi-steady assumption. In ASME Turbo Expo 2009: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. Volume 7 - Turbomachinery, Parts A and B (pp. 1203-1212). ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2009-59290

Comparison between steady and unsteady double-entry turbine performance using the quasi-steady assumption. / Copeland, Colin; Martinez-Botas, Ricardo; Seiler, Martin.

ASME Turbo Expo 2009: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. Volume 7 - Turbomachinery, Parts A and B . ASME, 2009. p. 1203-1212.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Copeland, C, Martinez-Botas, R & Seiler, M 2009, Comparison between steady and unsteady double-entry turbine performance using the quasi-steady assumption. in ASME Turbo Expo 2009: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. Volume 7 - Turbomachinery, Parts A and B . ASME, pp. 1203-1212, ASME Turbo Expo 2009, Orlando, UK United Kingdom, 8/06/09. https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2009-59290
Copeland C, Martinez-Botas R, Seiler M. Comparison between steady and unsteady double-entry turbine performance using the quasi-steady assumption. In ASME Turbo Expo 2009: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. Volume 7 - Turbomachinery, Parts A and B . ASME. 2009. p. 1203-1212 https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2009-59290
Copeland, Colin ; Martinez-Botas, Ricardo ; Seiler, Martin. / Comparison between steady and unsteady double-entry turbine performance using the quasi-steady assumption. ASME Turbo Expo 2009: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. Volume 7 - Turbomachinery, Parts A and B . ASME, 2009. pp. 1203-1212
@inproceedings{4a4a3392afde48df9607de542390b3bb,
title = "Comparison between steady and unsteady double-entry turbine performance using the quasi-steady assumption",
abstract = "The experimental performance evaluation of a circumferentially divided, double-entry turbocharger turbine is presented in this paper with the aim of understanding the influence of pulsating flow. By maintaining a constant speed but varying the frequency of the pulses, the influence of frequency was shown to play an important role in the performance of the turbine. A trend of decreasing cycle-averaged efficiency at lower frequencies was measured. One of the principal objectives was to assess the degree to which the unsteady performance differs from the quasi-steady assumption. In order to make the steady-unsteady comparison for a multiple entry turbine, a wide set of steady equal and unequal admission flow conditions were tested. The steady state data was then interpolated as a function of three, non-dimensional parameters in order to allow a point-by-point comparison with the instantaneous unsteady operation. As an average, the quasi-steady assumption generally under-predicted the mass flow and efficiency loss through the turbine, albeit the differences were reduced as the frequency increased. Out-of-phase pulsations produced unsteady operating orbits that corresponded to a significant steady state, partial admission loss, and this was reflected as a drop in the quasi-steady efficiency. However, these differences between quasi-steady in-phase and out-of-phase predictions were not replicated in the measured results, suggesting that the unequal admission loss is not as significant in pulsating flow as it is in steady flow.",
author = "Colin Copeland and Ricardo Martinez-Botas and Martin Seiler",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1115/GT2009-59290",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780791848883",
pages = "1203--1212",
booktitle = "ASME Turbo Expo 2009",
publisher = "ASME",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison between steady and unsteady double-entry turbine performance using the quasi-steady assumption

AU - Copeland, Colin

AU - Martinez-Botas, Ricardo

AU - Seiler, Martin

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The experimental performance evaluation of a circumferentially divided, double-entry turbocharger turbine is presented in this paper with the aim of understanding the influence of pulsating flow. By maintaining a constant speed but varying the frequency of the pulses, the influence of frequency was shown to play an important role in the performance of the turbine. A trend of decreasing cycle-averaged efficiency at lower frequencies was measured. One of the principal objectives was to assess the degree to which the unsteady performance differs from the quasi-steady assumption. In order to make the steady-unsteady comparison for a multiple entry turbine, a wide set of steady equal and unequal admission flow conditions were tested. The steady state data was then interpolated as a function of three, non-dimensional parameters in order to allow a point-by-point comparison with the instantaneous unsteady operation. As an average, the quasi-steady assumption generally under-predicted the mass flow and efficiency loss through the turbine, albeit the differences were reduced as the frequency increased. Out-of-phase pulsations produced unsteady operating orbits that corresponded to a significant steady state, partial admission loss, and this was reflected as a drop in the quasi-steady efficiency. However, these differences between quasi-steady in-phase and out-of-phase predictions were not replicated in the measured results, suggesting that the unequal admission loss is not as significant in pulsating flow as it is in steady flow.

AB - The experimental performance evaluation of a circumferentially divided, double-entry turbocharger turbine is presented in this paper with the aim of understanding the influence of pulsating flow. By maintaining a constant speed but varying the frequency of the pulses, the influence of frequency was shown to play an important role in the performance of the turbine. A trend of decreasing cycle-averaged efficiency at lower frequencies was measured. One of the principal objectives was to assess the degree to which the unsteady performance differs from the quasi-steady assumption. In order to make the steady-unsteady comparison for a multiple entry turbine, a wide set of steady equal and unequal admission flow conditions were tested. The steady state data was then interpolated as a function of three, non-dimensional parameters in order to allow a point-by-point comparison with the instantaneous unsteady operation. As an average, the quasi-steady assumption generally under-predicted the mass flow and efficiency loss through the turbine, albeit the differences were reduced as the frequency increased. Out-of-phase pulsations produced unsteady operating orbits that corresponded to a significant steady state, partial admission loss, and this was reflected as a drop in the quasi-steady efficiency. However, these differences between quasi-steady in-phase and out-of-phase predictions were not replicated in the measured results, suggesting that the unequal admission loss is not as significant in pulsating flow as it is in steady flow.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953193157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/GT2009-59290

U2 - 10.1115/GT2009-59290

DO - 10.1115/GT2009-59290

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9780791848883

SP - 1203

EP - 1212

BT - ASME Turbo Expo 2009

PB - ASME

ER -