TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison between adalimumab introduction and methotrexate dose escalation in patients with inadequately controlled psoriatic arthritis (CONTROL)
T2 - a randomised, open-label, two-part, phase 4 study
AU - Coates, Laura C.
AU - Tillett, William
AU - D'Agostino, Maria Antonietta
AU - Rahman, Proton
AU - Behrens, Frank
AU - McDearmon-Blondell, Erin L.
AU - Bu, Xianwei
AU - Chen, Liang
AU - Kapoor, Mudra
AU - Conaghan, Philip G.
AU - Mease, Philip
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was funded by AbbVie. Medical writing support was provided by Jamie Urbanik, PharmD, Nancy Dudek (both of AbbVie), and Laura Chalmers, PhD (2 the Nth, Cheshire, UK), funded by AbbVie. PGC is supported in part through the NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre; the views expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. AbbVie and the authors thank Maja Hojnik, a former employee of AbbVie, Erica Cummings, and Aurore Diamand, from the AbbVie Clinical Operations Group, for contributions to the study conception and design. The authors also thank Jenny M Chan, Nael Mostafa, and Christine M Lee, all of AbbVie, for their support with the pharmacokinetic analyses.
Funding Information:
The study was funded by AbbVie. Medical writing support was provided by Jamie Urbanik, PharmD, Nancy Dudek (both of AbbVie), and Laura Chalmers, PhD (2 the Nth, Cheshire, UK), funded by AbbVie. PGC is supported in part through the NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre; the views expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. AbbVie and the authors thank Maja Hojnik, a former employee of AbbVie, Erica Cummings, and Aurore Diamand, from the AbbVie Clinical Operations Group, for contributions to the study conception and design. The authors also thank Jenny M Chan, Nael Mostafa, and Christine M Lee, all of AbbVie, for their support with the pharmacokinetic analyses.
Funding Information:
LCC reports funding from a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) clinician scientist award; support from the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre; and reports serving on advisory boards, or consultancy, or speaker fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, Serac, and UCB. WT reports research grants from AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, and Lilly; and consultancy or speaker fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. M-AD reports serving on advisory boards, or consultancy, or speaker fees from AbbVie, BMS, Janssen, and Novartis. PR reports consulting fees from Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, and Pfizer; speakers bureau fees from Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, and Pfizer; and research grants from Janssen and Novartis. FB reports research grants from Celgene, Chugai, Janssen, Pfizer, and Roche; and personal fees from AbbVie, Boehringer, Celgene, Chugai, Genzyme, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi. ELM-B, XB, LC, and MK are full-time employees of AbbVie and might own stock or stock options. PGC reports serving as a consultant or on speaker bureaus for AbbVie, BMS, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Flexion Therapeutics, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Pfizer. PM reports research grants and consultation or speaker honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, and UCB.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/4/30
Y1 - 2022/4/30
N2 - Background: Many patients with psoriatic arthritis do not reach minimal disease activity (MDA) on methotrexate alone. This phase 4 open-label study aimed to compare attainment of MDA following introduction of adalimumab with methotrexate escalation in patients with psoriatic arthritis who do not reach MDA after an initial methotrexate course (≤15 mg every week). Methods: CONTROL was a phase 4, randomised, two-part, open-label study conducted in 14 countries and 46 sites. We recruited patients with confirmed active psoriatic arthritis, naive to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, with an inadequate response to 15 mg or less of methotrexate. In part 1, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either methotrexate 15 mg (oral or subcutaneous) every week with the addition of adalimumab 40 mg (subcutaneously) every other week (adalimumab plus methotrexate group) or methotrexate (oral or subcutaneous) escalation up to 25 mg every week (escalated methotrexate group). Randomisation was done using Interactive Response Technology and stratified by the duration of methotrexate treatment (≤3 months and >3 months). In this open-label study there was no masking; participants, people giving the interventions, those assessing outcomes, and those analysing the data were aware of group assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who reached MDA at 16 weeks. After 16 weeks (part 2), patients who reached MDA (responders) had their current therapy maintained or modified, wheras patients who did not reach MDA (non-responders) had their therapy escalated until 32 weeks. The primary endpoint in part 2 was the proportion of patients who reached MDA at 32 weeks, analysed in all patients who received one or more doses of study drug. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02814175. Findings: Between Aug 5, 2016, and March 19, 2020, 245 of 287 patients initially assessed were enrolled in the study (50% men and 50% women; 92% of patients were White). 123 patients were randomly assigned to receive adalimumab plus methotrexate and 122 patients to receive escalated methotrexate. All 245 patients were included in the primary analysis, and 227 completed part 1 and entered part 2. A significantly higher proportion of patients reached MDA at 16 weeks in the adalimumab plus methotrexate group (51 [41%] patients) compared with the escalated methotrexate group (16 [13%] patients; p<0·0001). Efficacy was generally maintained through 32 weeks for patients who reached MDA at 16 weeks, with 41 (80%) of 51 adalimumab responders and ten (67%) of 15 methotrexate responders maintaining MDA at 32 weeks. Of adalimumab non-responders, 17 (30%) of 57 patients reached MDA at 32 weeks after adalimumab escalation to every week dosing. Among methotrexate non-responders, 50 (55%) of 91 reached MDA after adalimumab introduction. In part 1, two patients in the adalimumab plus methotrexate group reported serious adverse events; and in part 2, one adalimumab responder, three adalimumab non-responders, and three methotrexate non-responders reported serious adverse events. No new safety signals were identified. Interpretation: Results from this novel treatment-strategy trial support the addition of adalimumab over escalating methotrexate in patients with psoriatic arthritis not reaching MDA after an initial methotrexate course. Safety results were consistent with the therapies' known safety profiles. Funding: AbbVie.
AB - Background: Many patients with psoriatic arthritis do not reach minimal disease activity (MDA) on methotrexate alone. This phase 4 open-label study aimed to compare attainment of MDA following introduction of adalimumab with methotrexate escalation in patients with psoriatic arthritis who do not reach MDA after an initial methotrexate course (≤15 mg every week). Methods: CONTROL was a phase 4, randomised, two-part, open-label study conducted in 14 countries and 46 sites. We recruited patients with confirmed active psoriatic arthritis, naive to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, with an inadequate response to 15 mg or less of methotrexate. In part 1, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either methotrexate 15 mg (oral or subcutaneous) every week with the addition of adalimumab 40 mg (subcutaneously) every other week (adalimumab plus methotrexate group) or methotrexate (oral or subcutaneous) escalation up to 25 mg every week (escalated methotrexate group). Randomisation was done using Interactive Response Technology and stratified by the duration of methotrexate treatment (≤3 months and >3 months). In this open-label study there was no masking; participants, people giving the interventions, those assessing outcomes, and those analysing the data were aware of group assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who reached MDA at 16 weeks. After 16 weeks (part 2), patients who reached MDA (responders) had their current therapy maintained or modified, wheras patients who did not reach MDA (non-responders) had their therapy escalated until 32 weeks. The primary endpoint in part 2 was the proportion of patients who reached MDA at 32 weeks, analysed in all patients who received one or more doses of study drug. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02814175. Findings: Between Aug 5, 2016, and March 19, 2020, 245 of 287 patients initially assessed were enrolled in the study (50% men and 50% women; 92% of patients were White). 123 patients were randomly assigned to receive adalimumab plus methotrexate and 122 patients to receive escalated methotrexate. All 245 patients were included in the primary analysis, and 227 completed part 1 and entered part 2. A significantly higher proportion of patients reached MDA at 16 weeks in the adalimumab plus methotrexate group (51 [41%] patients) compared with the escalated methotrexate group (16 [13%] patients; p<0·0001). Efficacy was generally maintained through 32 weeks for patients who reached MDA at 16 weeks, with 41 (80%) of 51 adalimumab responders and ten (67%) of 15 methotrexate responders maintaining MDA at 32 weeks. Of adalimumab non-responders, 17 (30%) of 57 patients reached MDA at 32 weeks after adalimumab escalation to every week dosing. Among methotrexate non-responders, 50 (55%) of 91 reached MDA after adalimumab introduction. In part 1, two patients in the adalimumab plus methotrexate group reported serious adverse events; and in part 2, one adalimumab responder, three adalimumab non-responders, and three methotrexate non-responders reported serious adverse events. No new safety signals were identified. Interpretation: Results from this novel treatment-strategy trial support the addition of adalimumab over escalating methotrexate in patients with psoriatic arthritis not reaching MDA after an initial methotrexate course. Safety results were consistent with the therapies' known safety profiles. Funding: AbbVie.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126837353&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S2665-9913(22)00008-X
DO - 10.1016/S2665-9913(22)00008-X
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85126837353
SN - 2665-9913
VL - 4
SP - e262-e273
JO - The Lancet Rheumatology
JF - The Lancet Rheumatology
IS - 4
ER -