Comparing the Carbon Footprint of Bio-Based and Conventional Insulation Materials

Valeria Cascione; Matt Roberts; Stephen Allen; Dan Maskell; Barrie Dams; Andrew Shea; Pete Walker; Stephen Emmitt

doi:10.5281/zenodo.6570379

Comparing the Carbon Footprint of Bio-Based and Conventional Insulation Materials

Valeria Cascione, Matt Roberts, Stephen Allen, Dan Maskell, Barrie Dams, Andrew Shea, Pete Walker, Stephen Emmitt

Research output: Chapter or section in a book/report/conference proceeding › Chapter in a published conference proceeding

207 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this article we report the results of a study using Life Cycle Assessment methods to evaluate the Global Warming Potential (GWP) of five bio-based materials (mycelium, flax, sheep’s wool, cellulose, wood fibre and cork) and two non-renewable insulation materials (mineral wool and PUR). This research demonstrated that sheep’s wool can have a GWP lower than competing non-bio-based materials. However, other bio-based materials, though made using renewable resources, can have higher GWP than non-renewable insulation. The aim of this paper is to share information on the GWP of bio-based materials to inform the selection of sustainable building products.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	18th International Conference on Non-conventional Materials and Technologies
Subtitle of host publication	(NOCMAT 2022)
Publisher	Zenodo
Volume	2022
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6570379
Publication status	Published - 22 May 2022
Event	18th International Conference on Non-conventional Materials and Technologies (NOCMAT 2022) - Duration: 7 Jun 2022 → 23 Jun 2022

Conference

Conference	18th International Conference on Non-conventional Materials and Technologies (NOCMAT 2022)
Period	7/06/22 → 23/06/22

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.5281/zenodo.6570379Licence: CC BY

NOCMAT_2022_paper_10.PDFFinal published version, 384 KBLicence: CC BY

Circular Biobased Construction Industry
Maskell, D. (PI), Allen, S. (CoI), Emmitt, S. (CoI), Shea, A. (CoI) & Walker, P. (CoI)
EU - Horizon 2020
1/03/19 → 30/09/22
Project: EU Commission

Cite this

Cascione, V., Roberts, M., Allen, S., Maskell, D., Dams, B., Shea, A., Walker, P., & Emmitt, S. (2022). Comparing the Carbon Footprint of Bio-Based and Conventional Insulation Materials. In 18th International Conference on Non-conventional Materials and Technologies: (NOCMAT 2022) (Vol. 2022). Article Session 1B, Part Paper 10 Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6570379

Comparing the Carbon Footprint of Bio-Based and Conventional Insulation Materials. / Cascione, Valeria; Roberts, Matt; Allen, Stephen et al.
18th International Conference on Non-conventional Materials and Technologies: (NOCMAT 2022). Vol. 2022 Zenodo, 2022. Session 1B, Part Paper 10.

Research output: Chapter or section in a book/report/conference proceeding › Chapter in a published conference proceeding

Cascione, V, Roberts, M, Allen, S , Maskell, D , Dams, B , Shea, A , Walker, P & Emmitt, S 2022, Comparing the Carbon Footprint of Bio-Based and Conventional Insulation Materials. in 18th International Conference on Non-conventional Materials and Technologies: (NOCMAT 2022). vol. 2022, Session 1B, Part Paper 10, Zenodo, 18th International Conference on Non-conventional Materials and Technologies (NOCMAT 2022), 7/06/22. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6570379

@inproceedings{cb819a0b94034c2d9bf11a06944fa656,

title = "Comparing the Carbon Footprint of Bio-Based and Conventional Insulation Materials",

abstract = "In this article we report the results of a study using Life Cycle Assessment methods to evaluate the Global Warming Potential (GWP) of five bio-based materials (mycelium, flax, sheep{\textquoteright}s wool, cellulose, wood fibre and cork) and two non-renewable insulation materials (mineral wool and PUR). This research demonstrated that sheep{\textquoteright}s wool can have a GWP lower than competing non-bio-based materials. However, other bio-based materials, though made using renewable resources, can have higher GWP than non-renewable insulation. The aim of this paper is to share information on the GWP of bio-based materials to inform the selection of sustainable building products.",

author = "Valeria Cascione and Matt Roberts and Stephen Allen and Dan Maskell and Barrie Dams and Andrew Shea and Pete Walker and Stephen Emmitt",

year = "2022",

month = may,

day = "22",

doi = "10.5281/zenodo.6570379",

language = "English",

volume = "2022",

booktitle = "18th International Conference on Non-conventional Materials and Technologies",

publisher = "Zenodo",

note = "18th International Conference on Non-conventional Materials and Technologies (NOCMAT 2022) ; Conference date: 07-06-2022 Through 23-06-2022",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparing the Carbon Footprint of Bio-Based and Conventional Insulation Materials

AU - Cascione, Valeria

AU - Roberts, Matt

AU - Allen, Stephen

AU - Maskell, Dan

AU - Dams, Barrie

AU - Shea, Andrew

AU - Walker, Pete

AU - Emmitt, Stephen

PY - 2022/5/22

Y1 - 2022/5/22

N2 - In this article we report the results of a study using Life Cycle Assessment methods to evaluate the Global Warming Potential (GWP) of five bio-based materials (mycelium, flax, sheep’s wool, cellulose, wood fibre and cork) and two non-renewable insulation materials (mineral wool and PUR). This research demonstrated that sheep’s wool can have a GWP lower than competing non-bio-based materials. However, other bio-based materials, though made using renewable resources, can have higher GWP than non-renewable insulation. The aim of this paper is to share information on the GWP of bio-based materials to inform the selection of sustainable building products.

AB - In this article we report the results of a study using Life Cycle Assessment methods to evaluate the Global Warming Potential (GWP) of five bio-based materials (mycelium, flax, sheep’s wool, cellulose, wood fibre and cork) and two non-renewable insulation materials (mineral wool and PUR). This research demonstrated that sheep’s wool can have a GWP lower than competing non-bio-based materials. However, other bio-based materials, though made using renewable resources, can have higher GWP than non-renewable insulation. The aim of this paper is to share information on the GWP of bio-based materials to inform the selection of sustainable building products.

U2 - 10.5281/zenodo.6570379

DO - 10.5281/zenodo.6570379

M3 - Chapter in a published conference proceeding

VL - 2022

BT - 18th International Conference on Non-conventional Materials and Technologies

PB - Zenodo

T2 - 18th International Conference on Non-conventional Materials and Technologies (NOCMAT 2022)

Y2 - 7 June 2022 through 23 June 2022

ER -

Comparing the Carbon Footprint of Bio-Based and Conventional Insulation Materials

Abstract

Conference

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Projects

Circular Biobased Construction Industry

Cite this