Comparative process architectures in two higher education institutions

Ian Beeson, Stuart Green, Richard Kamm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Enterprises are increasingly organising their activities and IT support around key business processes. These processes and their interrelationships may be identified in a process architecture. Ould (2005) claims that the Riva method identifies the process architecture that an organisation should have, and asserts that organisations in the same business have the same process architecture. This assertion is not self-evidently true, and it has not been corroborated by the literature. But it is an important claim: if true, then process architectures could be reused either for new process development, or for appraising an organisation's existing architecture. We assessed the assertion by comparing the process architectures produced by applying Riva to two higher education institutions. The results partially support the view that an essential process architecture underpins higher education institutions, and also that for regulated business domains the optimal process architecture may be one based upon designed as well as essential business entities. The conclusion is that process architecture reuse, with its attendant potential savings of time and money, is worth investigating further, even though the extent to which the invariant assertion is testable may not be clear yet.
LanguageEnglish
Pages35-66
JournalInternational Journal of Organisational Design and Engineering
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Higher education institutions
Savings
Organizing
Reuse
Business process
Development process
Interrelationship

Cite this

Comparative process architectures in two higher education institutions. / Beeson, Ian; Green, Stuart; Kamm, Richard.

In: International Journal of Organisational Design and Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2013, p. 35-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{570eaa31f08b42fca1e1136d7d3cd3b4,
title = "Comparative process architectures in two higher education institutions",
abstract = "Enterprises are increasingly organising their activities and IT support around key business processes. These processes and their interrelationships may be identified in a process architecture. Ould (2005) claims that the Riva method identifies the process architecture that an organisation should have, and asserts that organisations in the same business have the same process architecture. This assertion is not self-evidently true, and it has not been corroborated by the literature. But it is an important claim: if true, then process architectures could be reused either for new process development, or for appraising an organisation's existing architecture. We assessed the assertion by comparing the process architectures produced by applying Riva to two higher education institutions. The results partially support the view that an essential process architecture underpins higher education institutions, and also that for regulated business domains the optimal process architecture may be one based upon designed as well as essential business entities. The conclusion is that process architecture reuse, with its attendant potential savings of time and money, is worth investigating further, even though the extent to which the invariant assertion is testable may not be clear yet.",
author = "Ian Beeson and Stuart Green and Richard Kamm",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1504/IJODE.2013.053667",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "35--66",
journal = "International Journal of Organisational Design and Engineering",
issn = "1758-9797",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative process architectures in two higher education institutions

AU - Beeson,Ian

AU - Green,Stuart

AU - Kamm,Richard

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Enterprises are increasingly organising their activities and IT support around key business processes. These processes and their interrelationships may be identified in a process architecture. Ould (2005) claims that the Riva method identifies the process architecture that an organisation should have, and asserts that organisations in the same business have the same process architecture. This assertion is not self-evidently true, and it has not been corroborated by the literature. But it is an important claim: if true, then process architectures could be reused either for new process development, or for appraising an organisation's existing architecture. We assessed the assertion by comparing the process architectures produced by applying Riva to two higher education institutions. The results partially support the view that an essential process architecture underpins higher education institutions, and also that for regulated business domains the optimal process architecture may be one based upon designed as well as essential business entities. The conclusion is that process architecture reuse, with its attendant potential savings of time and money, is worth investigating further, even though the extent to which the invariant assertion is testable may not be clear yet.

AB - Enterprises are increasingly organising their activities and IT support around key business processes. These processes and their interrelationships may be identified in a process architecture. Ould (2005) claims that the Riva method identifies the process architecture that an organisation should have, and asserts that organisations in the same business have the same process architecture. This assertion is not self-evidently true, and it has not been corroborated by the literature. But it is an important claim: if true, then process architectures could be reused either for new process development, or for appraising an organisation's existing architecture. We assessed the assertion by comparing the process architectures produced by applying Riva to two higher education institutions. The results partially support the view that an essential process architecture underpins higher education institutions, and also that for regulated business domains the optimal process architecture may be one based upon designed as well as essential business entities. The conclusion is that process architecture reuse, with its attendant potential savings of time and money, is worth investigating further, even though the extent to which the invariant assertion is testable may not be clear yet.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJODE.2013.053667

U2 - 10.1504/IJODE.2013.053667

DO - 10.1504/IJODE.2013.053667

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 35

EP - 66

JO - International Journal of Organisational Design and Engineering

T2 - International Journal of Organisational Design and Engineering

JF - International Journal of Organisational Design and Engineering

SN - 1758-9797

IS - 1

ER -