Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparative evaluation of the genomes of three common Drosophila-Associated bacteria

Kristina Petkau, David Fast, Aashna Duggal, Edan Foley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster is an excellent model to explore the molecular exchanges that occur between an animal intestine and associated microbes. Previous studies in Drosophila uncovered a sophisticated web of host responses to intestinal bacteria. The outcomes of these responses define critical events in the host, such as the establishment of immune responses, access to nutrients, and the rate of larval development. Despite our steady march towards illuminating the host machinery that responds to bacterial presence in the gut, there are significant gaps in our understanding of the microbial products that influence bacterial association with a fly host. We sequenced and characterized the genomes of three common Drosophila-Associated microbes: Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus brevis and Acetobacter pasteurianus. For each species, we compared the genomes of Drosophila-Associated strains to the genomes of strains isolated from alternative sources. We found that environmental Lactobacillus strains readily associated with adult Drosophila and were similar to fly isolates in terms of genome organization. In contrast, we identified a strain of A. pasteurianus that apparently fails to associate with adult Drosophila due to an inability to grow on fly nutrient food. Comparisons between association competent and incompetent A. pasteurianus strains identified a short list of candidate genes that may contribute to survival on fly medium. Many of the gene products unique to fly-Associated strains have established roles in the stabilization of host-microbe interactions. These data add to a growing body of literature that examines the microbial perspective of host-microbe relationships.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1305-1316
Number of pages12
JournalBiology Open
Volume5
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Sept 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Data Availability Statement

This Whole Genome Shotgun project for L. brevis EF and A. pasteurianus AD have been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) under the accessions LPXV00000000 and LPWU00000000, respectively. The versions described in this paper are version LPXV01000000 and LPWU01000000, respectively. Chromosome1 of L. plantarum KP has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession CP013749 and plasmids 1-3 for the same strain have been deposited under the accession numbers CP013750, CP013751 and CP013752, respectively. Chromosome1 of L. plantarum DF has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession CP013753 and plasmids 1-3 for the same strain have been deposited under the accession numbers CP013754, CP013755 and CP013756, respectively.

Acknowledgements

Next generation sequencing services were performed by The Applied Genomics Core (TAGC) at the Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta.

Funding

This research was funded by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP 77746 to E.F.].

Keywords

  • Drosophila
  • Host-microbe
  • Intestine
  • Microbiota

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative evaluation of the genomes of three common Drosophila-Associated bacteria'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this