Comparative evaluation of point process forecasts

Jonas R. Brehmer, Tilmann Gneiting, Marcus Herrmann, Warner Marzocchi, Martin Schlather, Kirstin Strokorb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Stochastic models of point patterns in space and time are widely used to issue forecasts or assess risk, and often they affect societally relevant decisions. We adapt the concept of consistent scoring functions and proper scoring rules, which are statistically principled tools for the comparative evaluation of predictive performance, to the point process setting, and place both new and existing methodology in this framework. With reference to earthquake likelihood model testing, we demonstrate that extant techniques apply in much broader contexts than previously thought. In particular, the Poisson log-likelihood can be used for theoretically principled comparative forecast evaluation in terms of cell expectations. We illustrate the approach in a simulation study and in a comparative evaluation of operational earthquake forecasts for Italy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-71
Number of pages25
JournalAnnals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics
Volume76
Issue number1
Early online date15 Jun 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Feb 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo.

Keywords

  • Consistent scoring function
  • Elicitability
  • Forecast evaluation
  • Proper scoring rule
  • Statistical seismology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics and Probability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative evaluation of point process forecasts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this