Comparative Assessment of Technologies for Extraction of Artemisinin

Alexei A Lapkin, Pawel K Plucinski, Malcolm Cutler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

110 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper describes results of a multiobjective comparative assessment of several established and emerging technologies for extn. of a natural antimalarial substance, artemisinin. Extns. by hexane, supercrit. carbon dioxide, hydrofluorocarbon HFC-134a, ionic liqs., and ethanol were considered. Hexane extn. is an established technol. and appears to be the most cost-effective. However, it is characterized by lower rates and efficiency of extn. than all other considered techniques and is also worse in terms of safety and environmental impact. Similarly, EtOH extn. was found to be worse than hexane in all assessment parameters. The new technologies (scCO2, HFC, and ILs) are based on nonflammable solvents and are characterized by faster extn. cycles and more complete extn. of the useful substances and enable continuous extn. processes with reduced solvent inventory. Ionic liq. and HFC-134a technologies show considerable promise and should be able to compete with hexane extn. in terms of cost-effectiveness following due process optimization. New technologies are also considerably safer (no risk of explosions, low toxicity) and greener (having a lower environmental impact in use, potential for biodegradability after use). The methodol. of comparative assessment of established and emerging technologies is discussed. [on SciFinder (R)]
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1653-1664
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Natural Products
Volume69
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Biomedical Technology Assessment
norflurane
Hexanes
Technology
Environmental impact
Civil Rights
Explosions
Biodegradability
Antimalarials
Cost effectiveness
Carbon Dioxide
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Toxicity
Ethanol
artemisinine
Safety
Costs and Cost Analysis
Equipment and Supplies
Costs

Keywords

  • artemisinin extn
  • Extraction (comparative assessment of technol. for extn. of artemisinin)

Cite this

Comparative Assessment of Technologies for Extraction of Artemisinin. / Lapkin, Alexei A; Plucinski, Pawel K; Cutler, Malcolm.

In: Journal of Natural Products, Vol. 69, No. 11, 2006, p. 1653-1664.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lapkin, Alexei A ; Plucinski, Pawel K ; Cutler, Malcolm. / Comparative Assessment of Technologies for Extraction of Artemisinin. In: Journal of Natural Products. 2006 ; Vol. 69, No. 11. pp. 1653-1664.
@article{43763514870b4fc586030deddaa3d75d,
title = "Comparative Assessment of Technologies for Extraction of Artemisinin",
abstract = "This paper describes results of a multiobjective comparative assessment of several established and emerging technologies for extn. of a natural antimalarial substance, artemisinin. Extns. by hexane, supercrit. carbon dioxide, hydrofluorocarbon HFC-134a, ionic liqs., and ethanol were considered. Hexane extn. is an established technol. and appears to be the most cost-effective. However, it is characterized by lower rates and efficiency of extn. than all other considered techniques and is also worse in terms of safety and environmental impact. Similarly, EtOH extn. was found to be worse than hexane in all assessment parameters. The new technologies (scCO2, HFC, and ILs) are based on nonflammable solvents and are characterized by faster extn. cycles and more complete extn. of the useful substances and enable continuous extn. processes with reduced solvent inventory. Ionic liq. and HFC-134a technologies show considerable promise and should be able to compete with hexane extn. in terms of cost-effectiveness following due process optimization. New technologies are also considerably safer (no risk of explosions, low toxicity) and greener (having a lower environmental impact in use, potential for biodegradability after use). The methodol. of comparative assessment of established and emerging technologies is discussed. [on SciFinder (R)]",
keywords = "artemisinin extn, Extraction (comparative assessment of technol. for extn. of artemisinin)",
author = "Lapkin, {Alexei A} and Plucinski, {Pawel K} and Malcolm Cutler",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "1653--1664",
journal = "Journal of Natural Products",
issn = "0163-3864",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative Assessment of Technologies for Extraction of Artemisinin

AU - Lapkin, Alexei A

AU - Plucinski, Pawel K

AU - Cutler, Malcolm

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - This paper describes results of a multiobjective comparative assessment of several established and emerging technologies for extn. of a natural antimalarial substance, artemisinin. Extns. by hexane, supercrit. carbon dioxide, hydrofluorocarbon HFC-134a, ionic liqs., and ethanol were considered. Hexane extn. is an established technol. and appears to be the most cost-effective. However, it is characterized by lower rates and efficiency of extn. than all other considered techniques and is also worse in terms of safety and environmental impact. Similarly, EtOH extn. was found to be worse than hexane in all assessment parameters. The new technologies (scCO2, HFC, and ILs) are based on nonflammable solvents and are characterized by faster extn. cycles and more complete extn. of the useful substances and enable continuous extn. processes with reduced solvent inventory. Ionic liq. and HFC-134a technologies show considerable promise and should be able to compete with hexane extn. in terms of cost-effectiveness following due process optimization. New technologies are also considerably safer (no risk of explosions, low toxicity) and greener (having a lower environmental impact in use, potential for biodegradability after use). The methodol. of comparative assessment of established and emerging technologies is discussed. [on SciFinder (R)]

AB - This paper describes results of a multiobjective comparative assessment of several established and emerging technologies for extn. of a natural antimalarial substance, artemisinin. Extns. by hexane, supercrit. carbon dioxide, hydrofluorocarbon HFC-134a, ionic liqs., and ethanol were considered. Hexane extn. is an established technol. and appears to be the most cost-effective. However, it is characterized by lower rates and efficiency of extn. than all other considered techniques and is also worse in terms of safety and environmental impact. Similarly, EtOH extn. was found to be worse than hexane in all assessment parameters. The new technologies (scCO2, HFC, and ILs) are based on nonflammable solvents and are characterized by faster extn. cycles and more complete extn. of the useful substances and enable continuous extn. processes with reduced solvent inventory. Ionic liq. and HFC-134a technologies show considerable promise and should be able to compete with hexane extn. in terms of cost-effectiveness following due process optimization. New technologies are also considerably safer (no risk of explosions, low toxicity) and greener (having a lower environmental impact in use, potential for biodegradability after use). The methodol. of comparative assessment of established and emerging technologies is discussed. [on SciFinder (R)]

KW - artemisinin extn

KW - Extraction (comparative assessment of technol. for extn. of artemisinin)

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 1653

EP - 1664

JO - Journal of Natural Products

JF - Journal of Natural Products

SN - 0163-3864

IS - 11

ER -