Community pharmacists: members or bystanders of the primary care multidisciplinary team?

Marjorie Weiss, Elisabeth Grey, Hannah Family, Ross T. Tsuyuki, Jane Sutton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives
This study investigated who community pharmacists (CPs), general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses (PNs) included in their multidisciplinary team (MDT), whether they felt part of the MDT, barriers and facilitators to multidisciplinary working and whether the extent of the CPs’ clinical role influenced being part of a MDT.
Methods
Survey to CPs, GPs and PNs in south England. Participants were recruited using social media, journal ads and face-to-face visits/phone calls using NHS and professional networks. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses and content analysis for open text.
Key Findings
Two hundred and fourteen GPs, 147 PNs and 162 CPs responded. Nearly, all PNs (98%) and GPs (99%) considered themselves part of a MDT compared to 78% of CPs. Working in isolation, lack of time and a lack of information sharing were the most common reasons for not feeling part of a MDT. The extent of the CPs’ clinical role was not related to feeling part of a MDT.
Conclusions
Greater investment is needed in the structures to support multidisciplinary working in terms of time and resources, as well as a greater awareness of MDT members’ roles and potential contribution.
LanguageEnglish
Pages67-69
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research
Volume9
Issue number1
Early online date16 Jan 2018
DOIs
StatusPublished - 1 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

Pharmacists
Primary Health Care
General Practitioners
Nurses
General Practice
Emotions
Social Media
Nurse Practitioners
Information Dissemination
England
Multidisciplinary team
Primary care
General practitioners

Cite this

Community pharmacists: members or bystanders of the primary care multidisciplinary team? / Weiss, Marjorie; Grey, Elisabeth; Family, Hannah; Tsuyuki, Ross T.; Sutton, Jane.

In: Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.03.2018, p. 67-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7bff0176d875449784857c42b5c2991c,
title = "Community pharmacists: members or bystanders of the primary care multidisciplinary team?",
abstract = "ObjectivesThis study investigated who community pharmacists (CPs), general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses (PNs) included in their multidisciplinary team (MDT), whether they felt part of the MDT, barriers and facilitators to multidisciplinary working and whether the extent of the CPs’ clinical role influenced being part of a MDT.MethodsSurvey to CPs, GPs and PNs in south England. Participants were recruited using social media, journal ads and face-to-face visits/phone calls using NHS and professional networks. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses and content analysis for open text.Key FindingsTwo hundred and fourteen GPs, 147 PNs and 162 CPs responded. Nearly, all PNs (98{\%}) and GPs (99{\%}) considered themselves part of a MDT compared to 78{\%} of CPs. Working in isolation, lack of time and a lack of information sharing were the most common reasons for not feeling part of a MDT. The extent of the CPs’ clinical role was not related to feeling part of a MDT.ConclusionsGreater investment is needed in the structures to support multidisciplinary working in terms of time and resources, as well as a greater awareness of MDT members’ roles and potential contribution.",
author = "Marjorie Weiss and Elisabeth Grey and Hannah Family and Tsuyuki, {Ross T.} and Jane Sutton",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jphs.12214",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "67--69",
journal = "Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research",
issn = "1759-8885",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Community pharmacists: members or bystanders of the primary care multidisciplinary team?

AU - Weiss, Marjorie

AU - Grey, Elisabeth

AU - Family, Hannah

AU - Tsuyuki, Ross T.

AU - Sutton, Jane

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - ObjectivesThis study investigated who community pharmacists (CPs), general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses (PNs) included in their multidisciplinary team (MDT), whether they felt part of the MDT, barriers and facilitators to multidisciplinary working and whether the extent of the CPs’ clinical role influenced being part of a MDT.MethodsSurvey to CPs, GPs and PNs in south England. Participants were recruited using social media, journal ads and face-to-face visits/phone calls using NHS and professional networks. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses and content analysis for open text.Key FindingsTwo hundred and fourteen GPs, 147 PNs and 162 CPs responded. Nearly, all PNs (98%) and GPs (99%) considered themselves part of a MDT compared to 78% of CPs. Working in isolation, lack of time and a lack of information sharing were the most common reasons for not feeling part of a MDT. The extent of the CPs’ clinical role was not related to feeling part of a MDT.ConclusionsGreater investment is needed in the structures to support multidisciplinary working in terms of time and resources, as well as a greater awareness of MDT members’ roles and potential contribution.

AB - ObjectivesThis study investigated who community pharmacists (CPs), general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses (PNs) included in their multidisciplinary team (MDT), whether they felt part of the MDT, barriers and facilitators to multidisciplinary working and whether the extent of the CPs’ clinical role influenced being part of a MDT.MethodsSurvey to CPs, GPs and PNs in south England. Participants were recruited using social media, journal ads and face-to-face visits/phone calls using NHS and professional networks. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses and content analysis for open text.Key FindingsTwo hundred and fourteen GPs, 147 PNs and 162 CPs responded. Nearly, all PNs (98%) and GPs (99%) considered themselves part of a MDT compared to 78% of CPs. Working in isolation, lack of time and a lack of information sharing were the most common reasons for not feeling part of a MDT. The extent of the CPs’ clinical role was not related to feeling part of a MDT.ConclusionsGreater investment is needed in the structures to support multidisciplinary working in terms of time and resources, as well as a greater awareness of MDT members’ roles and potential contribution.

U2 - 10.1111/jphs.12214

DO - 10.1111/jphs.12214

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 67

EP - 69

JO - Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research

T2 - Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research

JF - Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research

SN - 1759-8885

IS - 1

ER -