Communication and cross-examination in court for children and adults with intellectual disabilities:

a systematic review

Joanne Morrison, Rachel Forrester-Jones, Jill Bradshaw, Glynis Murphy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Courts in England, Wales and Northern Ireland have identified children and adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) as vulnerable witnesses. The call from the English Court of Appeal is for advocates to adjust questioning during cross-examination according to individual needs. This review systematically examined previous empirical studies with the aim of delineating the particular communication needs of children and adults with ID during cross-examination. Studies utilising experimental methodology similar to examination/cross-examination processes, or which assessed the communication of actual cross-examinations in court were included. A range of communication challenges were highlighted, including: suggestibility to leading questions and negative feedback; acquiescence; accuracy; memory and understanding of court language. In addition, a number of influencing factors were identified, including: age; IQ level; question styles used. This review highlights the need for further research using cross-examination methodology and live practice, that take into consideration the impact on communication of the unique environment and situation of the cross-examination process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)366-398
Number of pages33
JournalThe International Journal of Evidence and Proof
Volume23
Issue number4
Early online date3 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2019

Keywords

  • Communication
  • court
  • cross-examination
  • intellectual disability
  • learning difficulties
  • learning disability
  • vulnerable defendant
  • vulnerable witness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Law

Cite this

Communication and cross-examination in court for children and adults with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. / Morrison, Joanne; Forrester-Jones, Rachel; Bradshaw, Jill; Murphy, Glynis.

In: The International Journal of Evidence and Proof, Vol. 23, No. 4, 01.10.2019, p. 366-398.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c4bb5c19bdb249c9bb250e2de7347ba3,
title = "Communication and cross-examination in court for children and adults with intellectual disabilities:: a systematic review",
abstract = "Courts in England, Wales and Northern Ireland have identified children and adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) as vulnerable witnesses. The call from the English Court of Appeal is for advocates to adjust questioning during cross-examination according to individual needs. This review systematically examined previous empirical studies with the aim of delineating the particular communication needs of children and adults with ID during cross-examination. Studies utilising experimental methodology similar to examination/cross-examination processes, or which assessed the communication of actual cross-examinations in court were included. A range of communication challenges were highlighted, including: suggestibility to leading questions and negative feedback; acquiescence; accuracy; memory and understanding of court language. In addition, a number of influencing factors were identified, including: age; IQ level; question styles used. This review highlights the need for further research using cross-examination methodology and live practice, that take into consideration the impact on communication of the unique environment and situation of the cross-examination process.",
keywords = "Communication, court, cross-examination, intellectual disability, learning difficulties, learning disability, vulnerable defendant, vulnerable witness",
author = "Joanne Morrison and Rachel Forrester-Jones and Jill Bradshaw and Glynis Murphy",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1365712719851134",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "366--398",
journal = "The International Journal of Evidence and Proof",
issn = "1365-7127",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communication and cross-examination in court for children and adults with intellectual disabilities:

T2 - a systematic review

AU - Morrison, Joanne

AU - Forrester-Jones, Rachel

AU - Bradshaw, Jill

AU - Murphy, Glynis

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - Courts in England, Wales and Northern Ireland have identified children and adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) as vulnerable witnesses. The call from the English Court of Appeal is for advocates to adjust questioning during cross-examination according to individual needs. This review systematically examined previous empirical studies with the aim of delineating the particular communication needs of children and adults with ID during cross-examination. Studies utilising experimental methodology similar to examination/cross-examination processes, or which assessed the communication of actual cross-examinations in court were included. A range of communication challenges were highlighted, including: suggestibility to leading questions and negative feedback; acquiescence; accuracy; memory and understanding of court language. In addition, a number of influencing factors were identified, including: age; IQ level; question styles used. This review highlights the need for further research using cross-examination methodology and live practice, that take into consideration the impact on communication of the unique environment and situation of the cross-examination process.

AB - Courts in England, Wales and Northern Ireland have identified children and adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) as vulnerable witnesses. The call from the English Court of Appeal is for advocates to adjust questioning during cross-examination according to individual needs. This review systematically examined previous empirical studies with the aim of delineating the particular communication needs of children and adults with ID during cross-examination. Studies utilising experimental methodology similar to examination/cross-examination processes, or which assessed the communication of actual cross-examinations in court were included. A range of communication challenges were highlighted, including: suggestibility to leading questions and negative feedback; acquiescence; accuracy; memory and understanding of court language. In addition, a number of influencing factors were identified, including: age; IQ level; question styles used. This review highlights the need for further research using cross-examination methodology and live practice, that take into consideration the impact on communication of the unique environment and situation of the cross-examination process.

KW - Communication

KW - court

KW - cross-examination

KW - intellectual disability

KW - learning difficulties

KW - learning disability

KW - vulnerable defendant

KW - vulnerable witness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067865923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1365712719851134

DO - 10.1177/1365712719851134

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 366

EP - 398

JO - The International Journal of Evidence and Proof

JF - The International Journal of Evidence and Proof

SN - 1365-7127

IS - 4

ER -