Communal narcissism

Jochen E. Gebauer, Constantine Sedikides, Bas Verplanken, Gregory R. Maio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

115 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An agency-communion model of narcissism distinguishes between agentic narcissists (individuals satisfying self-motives of grandiosity, esteem, entitlement, and power in agentic domains) and communal narcissists (individuals satisfying the same self-motives in communal domains). Five studies supported the model. In Study 1, participants listed their grandiose self-thoughts. Two distinct types emerged: agentic (“I am the most intelligent person”) and communal (“I am the most helpful person”). In Study 2, we relied on the listed communal grandiose self-thoughts to construct the Communal Narcissism Inventory. It was psychometrically sound, stable over time, and largely independent of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory—the standard measure of agentic narcissism. In Studies 3 and 4, agentic and communal narcissists shared the same self-motives, while crucially differing in their means for need satisfaction: Agentic narcissists capitalized on agentic means, communal narcissists on communal means. Study 5 revisited the puzzle of low self– other agreement regarding communal traits and behaviors. Attesting to the broader significance of our model, this low self– other agreement was partly due to communal narcissists: They saw themselves as high, but were seen by others as low, in communion.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)854-878
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume103
Issue number5
Early online date13 Aug 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2012

Fingerprint

Narcissism
narcissism
need satisfaction
Personality Inventory
human being
personality
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • narcissism
  • communion
  • agency
  • communal narcissism inventory
  • self

Cite this

Communal narcissism. / Gebauer, Jochen E.; Sedikides, Constantine; Verplanken, Bas; Maio, Gregory R.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 103, No. 5, 11.2012, p. 854-878.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gebauer, Jochen E. ; Sedikides, Constantine ; Verplanken, Bas ; Maio, Gregory R. / Communal narcissism. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2012 ; Vol. 103, No. 5. pp. 854-878.
@article{b16dde2b451349348f65f7f1cda88172,
title = "Communal narcissism",
abstract = "An agency-communion model of narcissism distinguishes between agentic narcissists (individuals satisfying self-motives of grandiosity, esteem, entitlement, and power in agentic domains) and communal narcissists (individuals satisfying the same self-motives in communal domains). Five studies supported the model. In Study 1, participants listed their grandiose self-thoughts. Two distinct types emerged: agentic (“I am the most intelligent person”) and communal (“I am the most helpful person”). In Study 2, we relied on the listed communal grandiose self-thoughts to construct the Communal Narcissism Inventory. It was psychometrically sound, stable over time, and largely independent of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory—the standard measure of agentic narcissism. In Studies 3 and 4, agentic and communal narcissists shared the same self-motives, while crucially differing in their means for need satisfaction: Agentic narcissists capitalized on agentic means, communal narcissists on communal means. Study 5 revisited the puzzle of low self– other agreement regarding communal traits and behaviors. Attesting to the broader significance of our model, this low self– other agreement was partly due to communal narcissists: They saw themselves as high, but were seen by others as low, in communion.",
keywords = "narcissism, communion, agency, communal narcissism inventory, self",
author = "Gebauer, {Jochen E.} and Constantine Sedikides and Bas Verplanken and Maio, {Gregory R.}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1037/a0029629",
language = "English",
volume = "103",
pages = "854--878",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communal narcissism

AU - Gebauer, Jochen E.

AU - Sedikides, Constantine

AU - Verplanken, Bas

AU - Maio, Gregory R.

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - An agency-communion model of narcissism distinguishes between agentic narcissists (individuals satisfying self-motives of grandiosity, esteem, entitlement, and power in agentic domains) and communal narcissists (individuals satisfying the same self-motives in communal domains). Five studies supported the model. In Study 1, participants listed their grandiose self-thoughts. Two distinct types emerged: agentic (“I am the most intelligent person”) and communal (“I am the most helpful person”). In Study 2, we relied on the listed communal grandiose self-thoughts to construct the Communal Narcissism Inventory. It was psychometrically sound, stable over time, and largely independent of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory—the standard measure of agentic narcissism. In Studies 3 and 4, agentic and communal narcissists shared the same self-motives, while crucially differing in their means for need satisfaction: Agentic narcissists capitalized on agentic means, communal narcissists on communal means. Study 5 revisited the puzzle of low self– other agreement regarding communal traits and behaviors. Attesting to the broader significance of our model, this low self– other agreement was partly due to communal narcissists: They saw themselves as high, but were seen by others as low, in communion.

AB - An agency-communion model of narcissism distinguishes between agentic narcissists (individuals satisfying self-motives of grandiosity, esteem, entitlement, and power in agentic domains) and communal narcissists (individuals satisfying the same self-motives in communal domains). Five studies supported the model. In Study 1, participants listed their grandiose self-thoughts. Two distinct types emerged: agentic (“I am the most intelligent person”) and communal (“I am the most helpful person”). In Study 2, we relied on the listed communal grandiose self-thoughts to construct the Communal Narcissism Inventory. It was psychometrically sound, stable over time, and largely independent of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory—the standard measure of agentic narcissism. In Studies 3 and 4, agentic and communal narcissists shared the same self-motives, while crucially differing in their means for need satisfaction: Agentic narcissists capitalized on agentic means, communal narcissists on communal means. Study 5 revisited the puzzle of low self– other agreement regarding communal traits and behaviors. Attesting to the broader significance of our model, this low self– other agreement was partly due to communal narcissists: They saw themselves as high, but were seen by others as low, in communion.

KW - narcissism

KW - communion

KW - agency

KW - communal narcissism inventory

KW - self

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870215374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029629

U2 - 10.1037/a0029629

DO - 10.1037/a0029629

M3 - Article

VL - 103

SP - 854

EP - 878

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 5

ER -