Common sense and hard decision analysis

why might they conflict?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose - Hard decision analysis models allow complex decisions to be broken down into easier-to-handle and precisely defined sub-problems and also provide a documented rationale for the decision. This paper aims to investigate why the course of action prescribed by a hard decision analysis model can sometimes conflict with a manager's common-sense view of the appropriate course of action, even when the model is based on judgments elicited from the manager. It also discusses how such conflicts might be resolved so that the decision can be made with greater insight and confidence.

Design/methodology/approach - The paper draws on the decision making and psychology literatures to obtain a definition of common-sense and to show how and why it might lead to conclusions that are at variance with those indicated by rational decision model.

Findings - Four possible reasons for conflicts between common-sense and a hard decision analysis model are identified. First, common sense reasoning is fuzzy while decision analysis models are precise. Second, under some circumstances, the axioms of a decision analysis model may conflict with common sense. Third, the decision model may be a misrepresentation of the decision problem because errors may have occurred when judgments were elicited from the decision maker. Fourth, common sense may suggest an inferior course of action.

Practical implications - The paper shows the potential dangers of making decisions based on common-sense alone or of relying unquestionably on a decision analysis model.

Originality/value - The paper shows that the exploration of conflicts between the indications of decision analysis models and common sense and may lead to better decision making.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)427-440
Number of pages14
JournalManagement Decision
Volume47
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Common sense
Decision analysis
Decision making
Managers
Decision model
Misrepresentation
Confidence
Psychology
P value
Decision maker
Design methodology
Axioms
Rationale

Keywords

  • Decision making
  • Managers
  • Intuition

Cite this

Common sense and hard decision analysis : why might they conflict? / Goodwin, Paul.

In: Management Decision, Vol. 47, No. 3, 2009, p. 427-440.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e6628b2802c34f96aa6a2c9e106cff57,
title = "Common sense and hard decision analysis: why might they conflict?",
abstract = "Purpose - Hard decision analysis models allow complex decisions to be broken down into easier-to-handle and precisely defined sub-problems and also provide a documented rationale for the decision. This paper aims to investigate why the course of action prescribed by a hard decision analysis model can sometimes conflict with a manager's common-sense view of the appropriate course of action, even when the model is based on judgments elicited from the manager. It also discusses how such conflicts might be resolved so that the decision can be made with greater insight and confidence. Design/methodology/approach - The paper draws on the decision making and psychology literatures to obtain a definition of common-sense and to show how and why it might lead to conclusions that are at variance with those indicated by rational decision model. Findings - Four possible reasons for conflicts between common-sense and a hard decision analysis model are identified. First, common sense reasoning is fuzzy while decision analysis models are precise. Second, under some circumstances, the axioms of a decision analysis model may conflict with common sense. Third, the decision model may be a misrepresentation of the decision problem because errors may have occurred when judgments were elicited from the decision maker. Fourth, common sense may suggest an inferior course of action. Practical implications - The paper shows the potential dangers of making decisions based on common-sense alone or of relying unquestionably on a decision analysis model. Originality/value - The paper shows that the exploration of conflicts between the indications of decision analysis models and common sense and may lead to better decision making.",
keywords = "Decision making, Managers, Intuition",
author = "Paul Goodwin",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1108/00251740910946697",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "427--440",
journal = "Management Decision",
issn = "0025-1747",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Common sense and hard decision analysis

T2 - why might they conflict?

AU - Goodwin, Paul

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Purpose - Hard decision analysis models allow complex decisions to be broken down into easier-to-handle and precisely defined sub-problems and also provide a documented rationale for the decision. This paper aims to investigate why the course of action prescribed by a hard decision analysis model can sometimes conflict with a manager's common-sense view of the appropriate course of action, even when the model is based on judgments elicited from the manager. It also discusses how such conflicts might be resolved so that the decision can be made with greater insight and confidence. Design/methodology/approach - The paper draws on the decision making and psychology literatures to obtain a definition of common-sense and to show how and why it might lead to conclusions that are at variance with those indicated by rational decision model. Findings - Four possible reasons for conflicts between common-sense and a hard decision analysis model are identified. First, common sense reasoning is fuzzy while decision analysis models are precise. Second, under some circumstances, the axioms of a decision analysis model may conflict with common sense. Third, the decision model may be a misrepresentation of the decision problem because errors may have occurred when judgments were elicited from the decision maker. Fourth, common sense may suggest an inferior course of action. Practical implications - The paper shows the potential dangers of making decisions based on common-sense alone or of relying unquestionably on a decision analysis model. Originality/value - The paper shows that the exploration of conflicts between the indications of decision analysis models and common sense and may lead to better decision making.

AB - Purpose - Hard decision analysis models allow complex decisions to be broken down into easier-to-handle and precisely defined sub-problems and also provide a documented rationale for the decision. This paper aims to investigate why the course of action prescribed by a hard decision analysis model can sometimes conflict with a manager's common-sense view of the appropriate course of action, even when the model is based on judgments elicited from the manager. It also discusses how such conflicts might be resolved so that the decision can be made with greater insight and confidence. Design/methodology/approach - The paper draws on the decision making and psychology literatures to obtain a definition of common-sense and to show how and why it might lead to conclusions that are at variance with those indicated by rational decision model. Findings - Four possible reasons for conflicts between common-sense and a hard decision analysis model are identified. First, common sense reasoning is fuzzy while decision analysis models are precise. Second, under some circumstances, the axioms of a decision analysis model may conflict with common sense. Third, the decision model may be a misrepresentation of the decision problem because errors may have occurred when judgments were elicited from the decision maker. Fourth, common sense may suggest an inferior course of action. Practical implications - The paper shows the potential dangers of making decisions based on common-sense alone or of relying unquestionably on a decision analysis model. Originality/value - The paper shows that the exploration of conflicts between the indications of decision analysis models and common sense and may lead to better decision making.

KW - Decision making

KW - Managers

KW - Intuition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67651042775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251740910946697

U2 - 10.1108/00251740910946697

DO - 10.1108/00251740910946697

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 427

EP - 440

JO - Management Decision

JF - Management Decision

SN - 0025-1747

IS - 3

ER -