Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Common method variance (CMV) bias: its implications, how to detect it, and how to handle it

  • Western University
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

5   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Common method variance (CMV) bias is commonly encountered in cross-sectional survey data in HRM generally, and HRD studies specifically. Despite a substantial and polarized debate over the issue and the proposal of various methods for detecting and handling it, confusion persists. This paper starts by clearly defining the problem and explaining the conditions under which it occurs. We explore the impact of CMV both when it affects the dependent and independent variables, and when it pertains only to independent variables. We then discuss commonly proposed solutions, paying specific attention to their limitations. We end with some general recommendations on detecting and dealing with CMV bias.

Original languageEnglish
JournalHuman Resource Development International
Early online date26 Jul 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 26 Jul 2025

Keywords

  • Common method variance
  • cross-sectional survey data
  • Harman common factor
  • marker variable

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Common method variance (CMV) bias: its implications, how to detect it, and how to handle it'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this