Collective future thinking in Cultural Dynamics

Yoshihisa Kashima, Paul Bain, Julian Fernando, Ann Truong

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Humans think about the future to act in the present, not only personally, but
also collectively. Collective future thinking (CFT) is an act of imagining a future
on behalf of a collective. This article presents a theoretical analysis of the role of
CFT in cultural dynamics. CFT includes collective prospection about probable
futures and imaginations about utopian and dystopian possible worlds as the
best- and worst-case scenarios. CFT motivates collective self-regulatory activities to steer probable futures towards utopias and away from dystopias, driving a cultural transformation while also acting as a force for cultural maintenance, animating cultural dynamics at the micro-psychological level. Empirical research showed that collective futures are often seen to involve progress in human agency, but a decline in community cohesion, unless collective self regulation is undertaken. In line with the theoretical proposition, CFT consistently motivated collective self-regulatory activities that are seen to improve future community cohesion and to move the current culture closer to their utopian vision around the world despite significant cross-national variabilities. A macro-level cultural dynamical perspective is provided to interpret crossnational similarities and differences in CFT as a reflection of nations’ past historical trajectories, and to discuss CFT’s role in political polarisation and collective self-regulation.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages45
JournalEuropean Review of Social Psychology
Early online date6 Feb 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 6 Feb 2025

Keywords

  • Cultural dynamics
  • collective future thinking
  • collective self-regulation
  • prospection
  • utopia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Collective future thinking in Cultural Dynamics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this