TY - JOUR
T1 - Cognitive defusion versus experiential avoidance in the reduction of smoking behaviour
T2 - an experimental and preliminary investigation
AU - Hooper, Nic
AU - Dack, Charlotte
AU - Karekla, Maria
AU - Niyazi, Asli
AU - McHugh, Louise
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Background: Brief procedures that reduce smoking behaviour may be useful in reaching the many people that do not seek help for smoking addiction. Objectives: The current study aimed to determine if one component of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), cognitive defusion, could be useful in reducing smoking behaviour in a sample of students. Methods: The study employed a between-subjects three-arm design. For one week, participants were asked to reduce their cigarette consumption. To aid them in their reduction, participants were randomly allocated to one of three conditions: the first received a defusion procedure, the second received an experiential avoidance procedure and a control condition received no procedure. For a second week, the instruction to reduce cigarette consumption was lifted. During both weeks participants were required to monitor their smoking behaviour via a tally diary system. Results: The defusion condition smoked significantly less than the control condition during week one and significantly less than the control and experiential avoidance conditions during week two. Conclusion: Results are discussed in terms of the potential utility of defusion in this domain, and the limitations of this preliminary research that would need to be addressed in future investigations.
AB - Background: Brief procedures that reduce smoking behaviour may be useful in reaching the many people that do not seek help for smoking addiction. Objectives: The current study aimed to determine if one component of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), cognitive defusion, could be useful in reducing smoking behaviour in a sample of students. Methods: The study employed a between-subjects three-arm design. For one week, participants were asked to reduce their cigarette consumption. To aid them in their reduction, participants were randomly allocated to one of three conditions: the first received a defusion procedure, the second received an experiential avoidance procedure and a control condition received no procedure. For a second week, the instruction to reduce cigarette consumption was lifted. During both weeks participants were required to monitor their smoking behaviour via a tally diary system. Results: The defusion condition smoked significantly less than the control condition during week one and significantly less than the control and experiential avoidance conditions during week two. Conclusion: Results are discussed in terms of the potential utility of defusion in this domain, and the limitations of this preliminary research that would need to be addressed in future investigations.
KW - Acceptance and commitment therapy
KW - defusion
KW - experiential avoidance
KW - smoking behaviour
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041565068&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/16066359.2018.1434156
DO - 10.1080/16066359.2018.1434156
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85041565068
SN - 1606-6359
VL - 26
SP - 414
EP - 420
JO - Addiction Research & Theory
JF - Addiction Research & Theory
IS - 5
ER -