Abstract
In cobotic service teams, employees and robots collaborate to serve customers. As cobotic teams become more prevalent, a key question arises: How do consumers respond to cobotic teams, as a function of the roles shared by employees and robots (robots in superordinate roles as team leaders and humans in subordinate roles as assistants, or vice versa)? Six studies, conducted in different healthcare settings, show that consumers respond less favorably to robot-led (vs. human-led) teams. In delineating the process underlying these responses, the authors demonstrate that consumers ascribe less power to robot (vs. human) team leaders, which increases consumer anxiety and drives downstream responses through serial mediation. Further examining the power dynamics in cobotic service encounters, the authors identify boundary conditions that help mitigate negative consumer responses (increasing consumers’ power by letting them choose the robot in the service team, leveraging consumers’ power distance beliefs, and reinforcing the robot’s performance capabilities).
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 27 |
Journal | Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science |
Early online date | 2 Mar 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 2 Mar 2024 |
Funding
This research is based on the dissertation of the first author, Ilana Shanks, who passed away unexpectedly and is deeply missed. The authors gratefully acknowledge a Customer Experience Grant from the Marketing Science Institute, which helped to support this research.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Lancaster University |
Keywords
- Anxiety
- Cobotic service teams
- Cobotics
- Healthcare
- Power
- Technology
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Business and International Management
- Economics and Econometrics
- Marketing