Co-worker reactions to i-deals through the lens of social comparison:

The role of fairness and emotions

Elise Marescaux, Sophie De Winne, Yasin Rofcanin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The individualization of working conditions has culminated in the form of “i-deals,” which are uniquely negotiated arrangements between employees (i-dealers) and their supervisor. Implementing such idiosyncratic deals, however, only makes sense when their benefits outweigh their costs. To assess their merit, co-worker reactions should be considered. Do i-deals trigger fairness perceptions and emotions among co-workers? And how do these factors influence co-workers’ behaviors? To date, the cognitive and emotional mechanisms of co-workers’ behavioral reactions have been underdeveloped. In this article, we build on social comparison theory to develop a process model. We argue that social comparison is not a given, as co-workers might not necessarily compare themselves with the i-dealer. Yet, if they engage in comparison, this can be upward when they feel disadvantaged or, alternatively, downward. Such comparisons include a unique set of emotions and fairness perceptions, which together influence co-workers’ behaviors positively or negatively. Moreover, we argue that the boundary conditions of the relational context within which i-deals unfold play an important role. Our model offers theoretical insights into co-worker reactions to i-deals as well as a future research agenda. The model also aids practitioners in understanding co-workers’ reactions and in guiding them to assure positive reactions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-25
Number of pages25
JournalHuman Relations
Early online date4 Nov 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 4 Nov 2019

Keywords

  • I-deals
  • social comparison
  • justice
  • emotions
  • conceptual study
  • fairness
  • i-deals
  • Envy
  • schadenfreude

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Co-worker reactions to i-deals through the lens of social comparison: The role of fairness and emotions. / Marescaux, Elise; De Winne, Sophie; Rofcanin, Yasin.

In: Human Relations, 04.11.2019, p. 1-25.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{40ce8cdc2cfc4dddb590d9476e6fb044,
title = "Co-worker reactions to i-deals through the lens of social comparison:: The role of fairness and emotions",
abstract = "The individualization of working conditions has culminated in the form of “i-deals,” which are uniquely negotiated arrangements between employees (i-dealers) and their supervisor. Implementing such idiosyncratic deals, however, only makes sense when their benefits outweigh their costs. To assess their merit, co-worker reactions should be considered. Do i-deals trigger fairness perceptions and emotions among co-workers? And how do these factors influence co-workers’ behaviors? To date, the cognitive and emotional mechanisms of co-workers’ behavioral reactions have been underdeveloped. In this article, we build on social comparison theory to develop a process model. We argue that social comparison is not a given, as co-workers might not necessarily compare themselves with the i-dealer. Yet, if they engage in comparison, this can be upward when they feel disadvantaged or, alternatively, downward. Such comparisons include a unique set of emotions and fairness perceptions, which together influence co-workers’ behaviors positively or negatively. Moreover, we argue that the boundary conditions of the relational context within which i-deals unfold play an important role. Our model offers theoretical insights into co-worker reactions to i-deals as well as a future research agenda. The model also aids practitioners in understanding co-workers’ reactions and in guiding them to assure positive reactions.",
keywords = "I-deals, social comparison, justice, emotions, conceptual study, fairness, i-deals, Envy, schadenfreude",
author = "Elise Marescaux and {De Winne}, Sophie and Yasin Rofcanin",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1177/0018726719884103",
language = "English",
pages = "1--25",
journal = "Human Relations",
issn = "0018-7267",
publisher = "Sage Publications",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Co-worker reactions to i-deals through the lens of social comparison:

T2 - The role of fairness and emotions

AU - Marescaux, Elise

AU - De Winne, Sophie

AU - Rofcanin, Yasin

PY - 2019/11/4

Y1 - 2019/11/4

N2 - The individualization of working conditions has culminated in the form of “i-deals,” which are uniquely negotiated arrangements between employees (i-dealers) and their supervisor. Implementing such idiosyncratic deals, however, only makes sense when their benefits outweigh their costs. To assess their merit, co-worker reactions should be considered. Do i-deals trigger fairness perceptions and emotions among co-workers? And how do these factors influence co-workers’ behaviors? To date, the cognitive and emotional mechanisms of co-workers’ behavioral reactions have been underdeveloped. In this article, we build on social comparison theory to develop a process model. We argue that social comparison is not a given, as co-workers might not necessarily compare themselves with the i-dealer. Yet, if they engage in comparison, this can be upward when they feel disadvantaged or, alternatively, downward. Such comparisons include a unique set of emotions and fairness perceptions, which together influence co-workers’ behaviors positively or negatively. Moreover, we argue that the boundary conditions of the relational context within which i-deals unfold play an important role. Our model offers theoretical insights into co-worker reactions to i-deals as well as a future research agenda. The model also aids practitioners in understanding co-workers’ reactions and in guiding them to assure positive reactions.

AB - The individualization of working conditions has culminated in the form of “i-deals,” which are uniquely negotiated arrangements between employees (i-dealers) and their supervisor. Implementing such idiosyncratic deals, however, only makes sense when their benefits outweigh their costs. To assess their merit, co-worker reactions should be considered. Do i-deals trigger fairness perceptions and emotions among co-workers? And how do these factors influence co-workers’ behaviors? To date, the cognitive and emotional mechanisms of co-workers’ behavioral reactions have been underdeveloped. In this article, we build on social comparison theory to develop a process model. We argue that social comparison is not a given, as co-workers might not necessarily compare themselves with the i-dealer. Yet, if they engage in comparison, this can be upward when they feel disadvantaged or, alternatively, downward. Such comparisons include a unique set of emotions and fairness perceptions, which together influence co-workers’ behaviors positively or negatively. Moreover, we argue that the boundary conditions of the relational context within which i-deals unfold play an important role. Our model offers theoretical insights into co-worker reactions to i-deals as well as a future research agenda. The model also aids practitioners in understanding co-workers’ reactions and in guiding them to assure positive reactions.

KW - I-deals

KW - social comparison

KW - justice

KW - emotions

KW - conceptual study

KW - fairness

KW - i-deals

KW - Envy

KW - schadenfreude

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074870385&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0018726719884103

DO - 10.1177/0018726719884103

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 25

JO - Human Relations

JF - Human Relations

SN - 0018-7267

ER -