Clinical psychologists' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to engaging service users in Index Offence Assessment and Formulation in a medium secure unit

Sarah Rusbridge, Oliver Tooze, Emma Griffith, Megan Wilkinson-Tough

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Index Offence Assessment and Formulation (IOAF) helps service users (SU) in secure units to make sense of their Index Offence, provides detailed understanding of risk and contributes to treatment planning and discharge decisions. Clinical Psychologists’ perceptions of barriers and facilitators to engaging SUs in IOAF within the Men’s and Women’s services of one medium secure unit were explored through focus groups. Thematic analysis identified two relevant domains: person-specific factors and the organisational context. Person-specific barriers included challenges in working with fragmented narratives, conflicting motivations to engage, service-user defences, and distorted perceptions of Clinical Psychologists’ roles. Giving clarity and choice to SUs facilitated engagement with the work. Regarding the organisational context, Clinical Psychologists within both services identified the importance of having adequate resources and care-team support to complete this work. Findings highlight the importance of developing an evidence-based framework for IOAF to be embedded within clear ‘risk’ care pathways through secure services.
LanguageEnglish
Pages106-123
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology
Volume29
Issue number1
Early online date5 Jul 2017
DOIs
StatusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Psychology
Patient Discharge
Focus Groups
Motivation
Therapeutics

Cite this

@article{0bd42546aecf44eb9391501f4dfbd098,
title = "Clinical psychologists' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to engaging service users in Index Offence Assessment and Formulation in a medium secure unit",
abstract = "Index Offence Assessment and Formulation (IOAF) helps service users (SU) in secure units to make sense of their Index Offence, provides detailed understanding of risk and contributes to treatment planning and discharge decisions. Clinical Psychologists’ perceptions of barriers and facilitators to engaging SUs in IOAF within the Men’s and Women’s services of one medium secure unit were explored through focus groups. Thematic analysis identified two relevant domains: person-specific factors and the organisational context. Person-specific barriers included challenges in working with fragmented narratives, conflicting motivations to engage, service-user defences, and distorted perceptions of Clinical Psychologists’ roles. Giving clarity and choice to SUs facilitated engagement with the work. Regarding the organisational context, Clinical Psychologists within both services identified the importance of having adequate resources and care-team support to complete this work. Findings highlight the importance of developing an evidence-based framework for IOAF to be embedded within clear ‘risk’ care pathways through secure services.",
author = "Sarah Rusbridge and Oliver Tooze and Emma Griffith and Megan Wilkinson-Tough",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/14789949.2017.1347803",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "106--123",
journal = "Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology",
issn = "1478-9949",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical psychologists' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to engaging service users in Index Offence Assessment and Formulation in a medium secure unit

AU - Rusbridge, Sarah

AU - Tooze, Oliver

AU - Griffith, Emma

AU - Wilkinson-Tough, Megan

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Index Offence Assessment and Formulation (IOAF) helps service users (SU) in secure units to make sense of their Index Offence, provides detailed understanding of risk and contributes to treatment planning and discharge decisions. Clinical Psychologists’ perceptions of barriers and facilitators to engaging SUs in IOAF within the Men’s and Women’s services of one medium secure unit were explored through focus groups. Thematic analysis identified two relevant domains: person-specific factors and the organisational context. Person-specific barriers included challenges in working with fragmented narratives, conflicting motivations to engage, service-user defences, and distorted perceptions of Clinical Psychologists’ roles. Giving clarity and choice to SUs facilitated engagement with the work. Regarding the organisational context, Clinical Psychologists within both services identified the importance of having adequate resources and care-team support to complete this work. Findings highlight the importance of developing an evidence-based framework for IOAF to be embedded within clear ‘risk’ care pathways through secure services.

AB - Index Offence Assessment and Formulation (IOAF) helps service users (SU) in secure units to make sense of their Index Offence, provides detailed understanding of risk and contributes to treatment planning and discharge decisions. Clinical Psychologists’ perceptions of barriers and facilitators to engaging SUs in IOAF within the Men’s and Women’s services of one medium secure unit were explored through focus groups. Thematic analysis identified two relevant domains: person-specific factors and the organisational context. Person-specific barriers included challenges in working with fragmented narratives, conflicting motivations to engage, service-user defences, and distorted perceptions of Clinical Psychologists’ roles. Giving clarity and choice to SUs facilitated engagement with the work. Regarding the organisational context, Clinical Psychologists within both services identified the importance of having adequate resources and care-team support to complete this work. Findings highlight the importance of developing an evidence-based framework for IOAF to be embedded within clear ‘risk’ care pathways through secure services.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2017.1347803

U2 - 10.1080/14789949.2017.1347803

DO - 10.1080/14789949.2017.1347803

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 106

EP - 123

JO - Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology

T2 - Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology

JF - Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology

SN - 1478-9949

IS - 1

ER -